slotvip 555 login
In conclusion, the demand for the swift arrest of Yoon Seok-youl and the pressure on President Moon Jae-in to step down are indicative of the deep-seated issues facing South Korea's government. The integrity of the country's democratic institutions is at stake, and the people's trust in their leaders has been severely tested. It is crucial that justice is served and accountability is upheld, in order to restore faith in the government and ensure a brighter future for the people of South Korea.The allegations of wrongdoing stem from reports that suggest irregularities in the transactions between Red Bird and Elliott Funds. It is alleged that certain financial transactions were carried out in a manner that raised suspicions of fraud or other unethical behaviors. As a result, authorities have launched an investigation to determine the veracity of these claims and to hold accountable those responsible for any wrongdoing.
Jharkhand chose welfare over fear mongering
The original version of this story appeared in Quanta Magazine . Much of mathematics is driven by intuition, by a deep-rooted sense of what should be true. But sometimes instinct can lead a mathematician astray. Early evidence might not represent the bigger picture; a statement might seem obvious, only for some hidden subtlety to reveal itself. Unexpectedly, three mathematicians have now shown that a well-known hypothesis in probability theory called the bunkbed conjecture falls into this category. The conjecture—which is about the different ways you can navigate the mathematical mazes called graphs when they’re stacked on top of each other like bunk beds—seemed natural, even self-evident. “Anything our brain tells us suggests the conjecture should be true,” said Maria Chudnovsky , a graph theorist at Princeton University who was not involved in the new work. But they were wrong. Last month, a trio of mathematicians announced a counterexample , disproving the conjecture. The result offers fresh guidance on how to approach related problems in physics about properties of solid materials. But it also taps into deeper questions about how mathematics works. A lot of mathematical effort is spent trying to prove conjectures true. It’s lonelier to try to pull them apart. The team behind the new work failed many times before they finally found their counterexample. Their story suggests that mathematicians may need to question their assumptions more often. Graphs on Graphs In the mid-1980s, a Dutch physicist named Pieter Kasteleyn wanted to mathematically prove an assertion about how liquids flow throughout porous solids. His work led him to pose the bunkbed conjecture. To understand it, start with a graph: a collection of points, or vertices, connected by lines, or edges. Now make an exact copy of the graph and place it directly above the original. Draw some vertical posts between them—additional edges that connect some of the vertices on the bottom graph with their twin vertices on the top graph. The structure you end up with resembles a bunk bed. Next, consider an edge in the bottom graph. Flip a coin. If it lands on heads, erase the edge. If it lands on tails, keep the edge. Repeat this process for every edge in both graphs. Your bottom and top bunks will end up looking different, but they’ll still be connected by the vertical posts. Finally, pick two vertices in the bottom graph. Can you get from one vertex to the other by following the graph’s edges, or are the two now disconnected? For any graph, you can calculate the probability that there will be a path. Now look at the same two vertices, but for one of them, jump up to the vertex directly above it in the top graph. Is there a path that will take you from the starting vertex on the bottom graph to the ending vertex on the top graph? The bunkbed conjecture says that the probability of finding the path on the bottom bunk is always greater than or equal to the probability of finding the path that jumps to the top bunk. It doesn’t matter what graph you start with, or how many vertical posts you draw between the bunks, or which starting and ending vertices you choose. For decades, mathematicians thought this had to be true. Their intuition told them that moving around on just one bunk should be easier than moving between two—that the extra vertical jump required to get from the lower to the upper bunk should significantly limit the number of available paths. Mathematicians also wanted the bunkbed conjecture to be true. It belongs to a class of statements in an area called percolation theory, which deals with the paths and clusters that exist after graphs have edges deleted at random. These graphs can be thought of as simplified models of how a fluid moves, or percolates, through a porous material, the way water moves through a sponge. The bunkbed conjecture, for its part, would imply a widely believed assumption in physics about how likely a fluid is to travel through a solid. It would also hint at how to solve related problems about the physics of percolation. But that would only happen if someone could prove that the bunkbed conjecture was true. There was a reason why no one could. Probably Wrong Igor Pak , a mathematician at the University of California, Los Angeles, always had his doubts that the bunkbed conjecture was true. “He was skeptical from the very beginning,” said Nikita Gladkov , one of his graduate students. “He’s a big disbeliever in old conjectures.” Pak has been a vocal critic of mathematicians’ tendency to focus their efforts on proving such conjectures. He asserts that equally important advances can come from asking, “ What if they are all wrong? ” Pak also had a particular reason for doubting the bunkbed conjecture: It seemed to be far too broad a claim. He was skeptical that it would really hold for every conceivable graph. “Some conjectures are motivated by substance, and other conjectures are motivated by wishful thinking,” he said. The bunkbed conjecture seemed like the latter. Nikita Gladkov ran an exhaustive, brute-force search on every graph to search for a counterexample. In 2022, he set out to disprove it. He spent a year making failed attempts. Then he instructed Gladkov to use a computer to run an exhaustive, brute-force search on every graph he could. Realizing the task would require some sophisticated programming, Gladkov enlisted a friend he’d known since high school, Aleksandr Zimin , now a graduate student at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. “We actually were roommates in college—we had a real bunk bed in our dorm,” Gladkov said. Gladkov, Pak, and Zimin were able to manually check every possible graph with fewer than nine vertices. In these cases, they could verify that the bunkbed conjecture held true. But for larger graphs, the number of possible situations blew up. They couldn’t account for all the possible ways that edges could be deleted or paths could be formed. The team then turned to machine learning. They trained a neural network to produce graphs with circuitous paths that might potentially prefer the upward jump. In many of the examples it spat out, they found that a bottom-bunk path was only the tiniest bit more probable than its top-bunk alternative. But the model didn’t uncover any graphs where the reverse was true. There was another problem. Each graph the neural network came up with was still so large that the mathematicians couldn’t possibly investigate every single outcome of the coin-flipping step. Rather, the team had to compute the probability of finding upper and lower paths over a subset of these outcomes—much as polls sample from a subset of voters to predict the result of an election. The mathematicians realized that they could be more than 99.99 percent confident in any counterexample their neural network gave them—but not 100 percent. They began to doubt whether pursuing this approach to the problem would be rewarded. It was unlikely to convince the mathematical community; certainly no prestigious journal would consider it a rigorous proof. “PhD students need jobs in reality, not in theory,” Pak wrote on his blog —and Gladkov and Zimin would be looking for jobs soon. “That is really why we stopped,” he continued. “Why persevere and create controversy when you can just try doing something else?” They gave up on their computational approach, but they didn’t stop thinking about the problem. For the next several months, they focused on formulating a theoretical argument that wouldn’t require a computer. But they didn’t have all the pieces they needed to complete it. Then a breakthrough came from abroad. Who Needs Computers? In June, Lawrence Hollom of the University of Cambridge disproved a version of the bunkbed problem in a different context. Instead of dealing with graphs, this formulation of the conjecture asked about objects called hypergraphs. In a hypergraph, an edge is no longer defined as the connection between a pair of vertices, but rather as the connection between any number of vertices. Hollom found a counterexample to this version of the conjecture. He created a small hypergraph whose edges each connected three vertices: Gladkov came across the paper and realized it was just what the trio needed. “I found it in the evening, and I read it until 3 am. I was like, ‘Wow, this is crazy. Absolutely mind-boggling,’” he said. He texted Zimin before going to sleep, and the two got on the phone the next day. Could they rework Hollom’s counterexample into a normal graph that would disprove the original bunkbed conjecture? This wasn’t the first time the pair of old friends had thought about how to translate hypergraphs into graphs. Early last year, they had discussed the issue just before attending a concert together. “The Red Hot Chili Peppers were singing, and I was thinking about this problem,” Gladkov said. “I was not listening to the music much.” They later developed techniques that allowed them to move from hypergraphs to graphs in particular situations. They could now use those techniques, they realized, to adapt Hollom’s hypergraph. Gladkov, Pak, and Zimin replaced each three-vertex edge in the hypergraph with a massive cluster of points and normal edges. This gave them an enormous graph of 7,222 vertices connected by 14,422 edges. They then used the theoretical argument they’d built up after abandoning their artificial intelligence approach to prove that in this graph, finding an upper path was 1/10 6,500 percent more likely than finding a lower one—an unimaginably small but nonzero number. The bunkbed conjecture was wrong. Aleksandr Zimin roomed with Gladkov in college, with an actual bunkbed in their dorm. Their result shows the importance of not taking anything for granted, said Noga Alon , a mathematician at Princeton. “We have to be suspicious, even about things that intuitively look very likely to be true.” Gladkov, Pak, and Zimin found many small-graph examples that satisfied the conjecture, but in the end, those did not reflect the more complicated, less intuitive graphs they could build when given enough vertices and edges. As Hollom put it, “Do we actually understand all this stuff as well as we think we do?” Mathematicians still believe the physics statement about connected locations within solids that inspired the bunkbed conjecture. But they’ll need to find a different way to prove it. In the meantime, Pak says, it’s clear that mathematicians need to engage in a more active discussion about the nature of mathematical proof. He and his colleagues ultimately didn’t have to rely on controversial computational methods; they were able to disprove the conjecture with total certainty. But as computer- and AI-based lines of attack become more common in mathematics research, some mathematicians are debating whether the field’s norms will eventually have to change. “It’s a philosophical question,” Alon said. “How do we view proofs that are only true with high probability?” “I think the future of mathematics will be to accept probabilistic proofs like this,” said Doron Zeilberger , a mathematician at Rutgers University who is known for crediting his computer as a coauthor on many of his papers. “In 50 years, or maybe less, people will have a new attitude.” Others wonder if such a future threatens something vital. “Maybe a probabilistic proof would give you less understanding or intuition of what’s really going on,” Alon said. Pak has suggested that separate journals be created for results of this kind as they become more common, so that their value isn’t lost to mathematicians. But his main goal is to open the conversation. “There’s no correct answer,” he said. “I want the community to meditate on whether the next result of this kind will count.” As technology continues to infiltrate and transform mathematics, the question will only become more pressing. Original story reprinted with permission from Quanta Magazine , an editorially independent publication of the Simons Foundation whose mission is to enhance public understanding of science by covering research developments and trends in mathematics and the physical and life sciences.Speculation and rumors have circulated in the wake of the discovery, with various theories being put forward by members of the public and the media. However, authorities have urged caution and patience, emphasizing the importance of allowing the investigation to proceed methodically and thoroughly in order to uncover the truth behind this troubling incident.
Pat Bryant caught a 40-yard touchdown on fourth down with four seconds remaining as No. 25 Illinois rallied for a dramatic 38-31 victory over Rutgers on Saturday afternoon in Piscataway, N.J. With Rutgers playing cover-zero defense, Bryant caught Luke Altmyer's sidearm toss on fourth-and-13 at the 22-yard line in the middle of the field and ran in from the right side for a 36-31 lead. Bryant's dramatic catch came after Illinois initially decided to attempt a go-ahead 57-yard field goal into the wind. Following a timeout, the Ilini went for it on fourth down. Altmeyer's two-point conversion attempt to Bryant was incomplete, but the visitors recorded a safety on the game's final play. Bryant finished with seven catches for a career-high 197 yards, and his score came after Rutgers took a 31-30 lead on a 13-yard rushing TD by Kyle Monangai with 1:08 left. Monangai gave the Scarlet Knights the lead after Illinois overcame a nine-point deficit on Aidan Laughery's 8-yard TD run with 13:48 remaining and Altmyer's 30-yard run with 3:07 left. Bryant's clutch catch gave Illinois (8-3, 5-3 Big Ten) eight wins for the second time in three seasons on a day when it committed 11 penalties. Altmyer finished 12-of-26 passing for 249 yards and threw two touchdowns. He also gained a team-high 74 yards on the ground as the Ilini totaled 182 rushing yards. Monangai finished with 122 yards on 28 carries and Kaliakmanis completed 19-of-37 passes for 175 yards, but Rutgers (6-5, 3-5) was unable to win a third straight Big Ten game for the first time. Kaliakmanis also rushed for 84 yards and two touchdowns on 13 carries. The Scarlet Knights saw their losing streak against ranked teams reach 41 games after taking a 17-9 halftime lead and a 24-15 advantage early in the fourth. --Field Level MediaHoliday gatherings for families like the RomualdezesAs gamers eagerly await the release of the PlayStation 5 Pro, they can now appreciate the hidden connection between their favorite console and a simple bathroom heater. Who would have thought that a household appliance could influence the future of gaming in such a profound way?
As the UEFA Champions League quarter-finals kick off today, foreign media outlets have been buzzing with predictions and analysis on the likely outcomes of the matches. One of the most talked-about topics is the win rate of Spanish giants Real Madrid, which is said to be less than forty percent according to various sources. On the other hand, clubs like Paris Saint-Germain, Bayern Munich, and Liverpool are being touted as clear favorites to advance to the next round.One of the key factors driving the growth in global trade is the increased demand for goods in various sectors. As economies continue to reopen and consumer confidence improves, there has been a surge in consumption, leading to higher imports and exports. This increased demand has helped to boost trade volumes across different regions and sectors, contributing to the overall growth in global merchandise trade.If you’re new to snowboarding, you may not realize the importance of a solid pair of snowboard bindings. In reality, this piece of gear does more than just secure your boots to the snowboard. Bindings are responsible for transferring the power from your legs to the board, allowing improved control and comfort. A quality pair of bindings could last for years, so the decision to buy is a big one. For snowboard bindings that are durable, lightweight and comfortable, check out the BURTON Malavita Snowboard Bindings . Some snowboard bindings are better suited for certain riding styles. Consider how you plan to use your snowboard before settling on a specific pair of bindings. If you’re not sure, try renting some gear for a day and see how the bindings feel on the slopes. Many snowboard manufacturers include a 1 to 10 flexibility rating with their bindings. A high number indicates stiff bindings, while a low number is assigned to bindings that are particularly soft and flexible. Most snowboard bindings have straps that secure the ankle and toe sections of your boots to the board. The ankle straps keep you in a flexible yet fixed position when you lean forward onto your toes, while the toe straps keep your feet in place when you lean back. Padding is used on snowboard bindings to absorb some of the shock caused by bumpy runs. Think about your riding style when deciding how much padding you need. Mounts secure the bindings to the board. You can use mounting screws to attach the bindings and adjust the foot positioning to your preference. Just like a snowboard, snowboard bindings come in a wide variety of different colors and patterns. If you want a cohesive look, pick out bindings that match the rest of your gear. When shopping for snowboard gear online, try to purchase from well-known brands like Burton, Salomon or Rossignol. Cheap snowboard bindings from an obscure manufacturer might be tempting, but you could find yourself with an inferior product once you hit the slopes. The cost of snowboard bindings can vary depending on the brand name and the quality of the parts. Beginner and intermediate snowboarders can expect to pay around $100-$250 for a quality pair of bindings, while advanced snowboard bindings regularly exceed $300. A. Most snowboard bindings are sold in two to five size options. Look at the model’s sizing chart and compare it with your boot size to find bindings that fit you. A. Yes. Although there are women’s snowboard bindings that advertise particular design features, snowboard bindings are universal. This means you can choose any pair you want, as long as they’re the right size. BURTON Malavita Snowboard Bindings What you need to know: Despite being advertised as men’s snowboard bindings, these bindings use advanced technology to deliver quality support and performance for any rider. What you’ll love: Backed by Burton’s legendary reputation, these snowboard bindings offer an advanced level of performance, control and comfort in a stylish package. The padding has a gel to absorb extra shock, and the bindings come in five color options. What you should consider: These bindings might be too expensive for beginner and intermediate riders. Salomon Pact Snowboard Bindings What you need to know: These versatile bindings are durable and affordable enough for almost any rider. What you’ll love: A solid choice for beginners, these snowboard bindings have a rear-entry design with high-quality straps for fine adjustments. Many users note their durability and comfort during long days of riding. What you should consider: These bindings have a limited number of size options, and the mounting discs may not attach to every board type. BURTON Grom Snowboard Bindings What you need to know: Designed for kids and small snowboarders, these popular bindings have a solid construction and reasonable price tag. What you’ll love: Perfect for young riders hitting the slopes for the first time, these beginner bindings are compatible with most snowboard mounting systems and feature a single-component baseplate for consistent control and responsiveness. They’re also available in two sleek color options, black and white. What you should consider: Some users questioned the quality and longevity of the bindings’ highback. Prices listed reflect time and date of publication and are subject to change. Check out our Daily Deals for the best products at the best prices and sign up here to receive the BestReviews weekly newsletter full of shopping inspo and sales. BestReviews spends thousands of hours researching, analyzing and testing products to recommend the best picks for most consumers. BestReviews and its newspaper partners may earn a commission if you purchase a product through one of our links.
Warriors face Pelicans, out to stay perfect in NBA Cup playThe Yunnan Firefighters expressed their disappointment following the assessment, emphasizing the importance of having well-trained and reliable rescue dogs to assist in their operations. Despite the setback, they remain committed to providing the necessary support and training to help these dogs improve their performance and excel in their roles as valuable members of the firefighting team.
Reflecting on 2024 in his annual end-of-year press conference, President Vladimir Putin described the year as a "landmark" in achieving the "goals" of Russia’s war against Ukraine. And at a Defense Ministry session this month, Putin said Russian forces had captured 189 settlements at the front and that the Armed Forces had grown to 1.5 million personnel, boasting that over 1,000 volunteers were signing military contracts every day. These figures appear to have done little to give Moscow a significant advantage over Kyiv in the third year of a war that it expected to win in a matter of days. While Moscow continues to occupy large swathes of Ukraine, it has not achieved significant gains this year. Kyiv, which has held parts of Russia's Kursk region since August, has also not advanced, leading analysts to debate whether the war had reached a stalemate. Yet Russian forces are now closing in on the city of Pokrovsk — which, if captured, could open a path to controlling all of the Donetsk region. Here is an overview of the year’s key developments on the battlefield: When Kyiv launched its incursion into Russia’s border region of Kursk in August, it became the most significant foreign attack on Russian territory since World War II. The offensive has seen Kyiv capture over two dozen settlements in Kursk, including the town of Sudzha, a key natural gas transit hub between Russia and Europe. Thousands have been evacuated from Kursk and remain displaced. Many others remain trapped in Kyiv-held territory. Analysts say that while the incursion is viewed as a significant military success for Ukraine — both on the ground and politically — the area remains a major challenge for Kyiv and Moscow. Moscow has deployed thousands of North Korean soldiers to the region to help claw back its lands, the U.S. Department of Defense said, with Kyiv reporting that it has encountered troops from the reclusive country in combat. As of November, Kyiv still controlled 800 square kilometers of Kursk, down from previous estimates that it controlled almost 1,400 square kilometers, a Ukrainian army source told AFP. Many believe that the region could be used as a bargaining chip in potential ceasefire talks between Moscow and Kyiv, and that the fighting in Kursk could intensify as Russia seeks a political win by regaining control of its territories. During his annual press conference this month, Putin promised to drive Ukrainian forces out of the Kursk region but did not specify a timeline. “In the coming months, we are likely to see Moscow try to push Ukraine back [from the Kursk region] as quickly as possible,” said Ivan Stupak, a military expert and ex-officer of Ukraine’s SBU Security Service. Yet experts say that significant changes may follow the January inauguration of U.S. President-elect Donald Trump, who has promised to “end the war” upon taking office — potentially paving the way for negotiations between Moscow, Kyiv and Washington. At his press conference, Putin said he was ready to speak to Trump “anytime.” Russia and Ukraine have been ratcheting up their deadly aerial offensives, unleashing increasingly advanced weaponry and spurring fears that the conflict could further escalate. U.S. President Joe Biden in November cleared Kyiv to use U.S.-made ATACMS long-range missiles against military targets inside Russia, a move that Moscow had long warned would provoke a devastating response. On Nov. 21, Russia launched the Oreshnik, an experimental, nuclear-capable ballistic missile, against Ukraine for the first time in what Putin called a response to Kyiv's use of ATACMS against targets on Russian soil. The launch came days after Putin signed a decree lowering the threshold for the use of nuclear weapons. Experts believe the new missile flies at 10 times the speed of sound and may be able to strike targets up to 5,500 kilometers away. Yet according to Stupak, the use of Oreshnik was more as “a PR show” than a genuine escalation of the war. At the same time, while Kyiv’s use of ATACMS has complicated Russia's logistics in frontline areas, their deployment has also had a modest impact on the overall course of hostilities. “From a military standpoint, it was clear that the use of a small number of missiles on key specific targets was not going to drastically change the situation on the frontlines,” Israeli military expert David Sharp told The Moscow Times. “While the use [of ATACMS] came with certain losses [for Moscow], it was more as a political message for Russia,” he said. Ukraine’s eastern regions remained the epicenter of heavy fighting, with Moscow advancing and pressing overstretched and outgunned Ukrainian forces for months. In October, the Russian army advanced 478 square kilometers into Ukrainian territory, a record since March 2022 in the first weeks of the war, according to an AFP analysis of data from the U.S. think tank Institute for the Study of War (ISW). That’s more territory than Moscow gained in August and September 2024 (477 and 459 square kilometers respectively). The last time Russia made such advances was in March 2022, when they marched towards the capital Kyiv in the early stages of the war. As of mid-December, Russian forces were only several kilometers from Pokrovsk in the Donetsk region, which they have been approaching from the south and east for months. Moscow's army was also gaining territory at the north of the front, having seized more than 40 square kilometers near the Kharkiv region city of Kupiansk last month. Captured by Russian troops in the early stages of the war, Kupiansk was then retaken by Ukraine in a September 2022 counteroffensive. According to Stupak, the Russian army's tactic is to encircle settlements from all sides instead of launching costly and time-consuming frontal assaults. “The tactic works, but the cost is another matter. Russia has suffered significant losses and appeared to show little concern for its troops. But Ukraine is also taking losses," Stupak said. Throughout 2023, Russian forces seized just 584 square kilometers of Ukrainian territory, according to AFP analysis based on data released by the ISW. Yet since Jan. 1, 2024, they have already taken more than 2,660 square kilometers, an area slightly bigger than the size of Moscow. From the start of the war in February 2022 until Oct. 27, 2024, Russia had taken 67,192 square kilometers of Kyiv's land. Along with the annexed Crimean peninsula and the areas of eastern Ukraine controlled by Moscow-backed separatists before the Kremlin's February 2022 invasion, Russia currently controls 18.2% of Ukraine's 2013 territory. AFP contributed reporting.Snap Inc. stock underperforms Monday when compared to competitors despite daily gainsGreenpeace gives Bohol islands a solar energy upgradeGuwahati, Nov 24 (PTI) Asserting that the BJP has always been focused on minority voters without any appeasement policies, Assam Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma on Sunday said the party’s victory in the Karimganj Lok Sabha constituency in June and the recent bypoll in the Samaguri assembly seat reflects the success of its principal of treating all equally. Addressing a press conference here, he said the BJP has its roadmap defined for the minority-dominated seats for the 2026 assembly elections. “Our focus has always been on minority voters but with the principal ‘appeasement to none, justice to all’. It has also been reflected in our ‘sabka saath, sabka vikash’ motto,” he said. Sarma claimed that as a result of this non-appeasement policy, the BJP had won the Karimganj Lok Sabha seat and now the Samaguri assembly constituency, both of which have about 65 per cent Muslim voters. “Karimganj was the best and most critical result for me in the Lok Sabha polls. But everyone was writing about Jorhat and undermining Karinganj,” he said, referring to the attention to Congress leader Gaurav Gogoi’s victory. The CM said the BJP has its roadmap defined for minority-dominated seats for the assembly polls, and though it cannot make an impact in all, it has identified at least five-six constituencies to make inroads. “Keep an eye on Lahorighat, North and South Karimganj, Samaguri and Rupohi seats next elections. Whether BJP will win or not I cannot say, but we will give a good contest,” he stated. Sarma also claimed that the Badruddin Ajmal-led AIUDF not contesting in Samaguri this time has worked in favour of the BJP. “If the AIUDF had fielded its candidate, our votes would have gone to them. The AIUDF not being in the fray has worked for us,” he said. Describing the BJP-led ruling alliance’s victory in all the five assembly seats in the by-elections as an “unprecedented success”, the CM said, “Generally, bypolls ahead of general elections bring uncertainty for the ruling party and keep the government under pressure. But we are grateful to the people for their massive support. We were confident of winning four seats, but being able to get Samaguri out of Congress’s clutches after 25 years has been something else.” Besides Samaguri, bypolls were held in Behali, Dholai, Bongaigaon and Sidli. Accusing the press of giving more attention to Behali where Gogoi was campaigning, Sarma said, “When I tracked coverage last month, it felt like there were no readers or viewers in Dholai, Bongaigaon and Sidli.” Speaking at the felicitation programme for the three winning candidates at the BJP state headquarters later, Sarma said all of them were self-made with no political lineage. “Our ideal is Narendra Modi, Atal Behari Vajyapee, not some royal family. For Congress, their ideals are the royal family, Rahul Gandhi, Priyanka Gandhi,” he added. He also affirmed that the BJP remains committed to its allies, and pointed out that it left the Bongaigaon and Sidli seats to AGP and UPPL for the bypolls. “But the Congress snatched Behali from CPI(ML) Liberation, which had earlier contested there as the opposition alliance member,” he said. The CM said the bypolls were a reflection of the mood of the people in different parts of the state as all the assembly segments were located in specific geographical locations. Mentioning the victory in Samaguri, he said, “It was a tough seat for us as the demography there was different from those who have been voting for BJP so far. But our policy of equal development worked.” Referring to an attack on him while campaigning in Samaguri in 2016, he said, “It feels like justice that in the same panchayat where we had come under attack, we polled 49.5 per cent of the votes this time.” PTI SSG SSG SOM This report is auto-generated from PTI news service. ThePrint holds no responsibility for its content. var ytflag = 0;var myListener = function() {document.removeEventListener('mousemove', myListener, false);lazyloadmyframes();};document.addEventListener('mousemove', myListener, false);window.addEventListener('scroll', function() {if (ytflag == 0) {lazyloadmyframes();ytflag = 1;}});function lazyloadmyframes() {var ytv = document.getElementsByClassName("klazyiframe");for (var i = 0; i < ytv.length; i++) {ytv[i].src = ytv[i].getAttribute('data-src');}} Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. Δ document.getElementById( "ak_js_1" ).setAttribute( "value", ( new Date() ).getTime() );
In the world of badminton, the Holy Altar Combination has emerged as the undeniable powerhouse in women's doubles, showcasing exceptional skill, teamwork, and determination on the court. Comprising two talented and formidable players, the duo has carved a path of success and dominance throughout the year, solidifying their status as the best women's doubles pair in the world.Yellowstone fans all saying the same thing about show creator Taylor Sheridan after Kevin Costner's exit
Moreover, the upturn in market sentiment can also be attributed to improving economic conditions and investor outlook. With positive economic indicators and steady growth projections, investors are regaining confidence in the property market as a lucrative investment opportunity. The emergence of new development projects, increased demand for housing, and a more favorable lending environment have further bolstered market sentiment, signaling a potential recovery in the real estate sector.
In the age of social media and instant communication, the spread of false information has become a common occurrence. One such hoax that has recently resurfaced is the rumor about a zoo purportedly hiring wild people as actors for $500 per day. Despite being debunked multiple times in the past, this false news continues to circulate online, causing confusion and alarm among unsuspecting readers.None
If you’re new to snowboarding, you may not realize the importance of a solid pair of snowboard bindings. In reality, this piece of gear does more than just secure your boots to the snowboard. Bindings are responsible for transferring the power from your legs to the board, allowing improved control and comfort. A quality pair of bindings could last for years, so the decision to buy is a big one. For snowboard bindings that are durable, lightweight and comfortable, check out the BURTON Malavita Snowboard Bindings . Some snowboard bindings are better suited for certain riding styles. Consider how you plan to use your snowboard before settling on a specific pair of bindings. If you’re not sure, try renting some gear for a day and see how the bindings feel on the slopes. Many snowboard manufacturers include a 1 to 10 flexibility rating with their bindings. A high number indicates stiff bindings, while a low number is assigned to bindings that are particularly soft and flexible. Most snowboard bindings have straps that secure the ankle and toe sections of your boots to the board. The ankle straps keep you in a flexible yet fixed position when you lean forward onto your toes, while the toe straps keep your feet in place when you lean back. Padding is used on snowboard bindings to absorb some of the shock caused by bumpy runs. Think about your riding style when deciding how much padding you need. Mounts secure the bindings to the board. You can use mounting screws to attach the bindings and adjust the foot positioning to your preference. Just like a snowboard, snowboard bindings come in a wide variety of different colors and patterns. If you want a cohesive look, pick out bindings that match the rest of your gear. When shopping for snowboard gear online, try to purchase from well-known brands like Burton, Salomon or Rossignol. Cheap snowboard bindings from an obscure manufacturer might be tempting, but you could find yourself with an inferior product once you hit the slopes. The cost of snowboard bindings can vary depending on the brand name and the quality of the parts. Beginner and intermediate snowboarders can expect to pay around $100-$250 for a quality pair of bindings, while advanced snowboard bindings regularly exceed $300. A. Most snowboard bindings are sold in two to five size options. Look at the model’s sizing chart and compare it with your boot size to find bindings that fit you. A. Yes. Although there are women’s snowboard bindings that advertise particular design features, snowboard bindings are universal. This means you can choose any pair you want, as long as they’re the right size. BURTON Malavita Snowboard Bindings What you need to know: Despite being advertised as men’s snowboard bindings, these bindings use advanced technology to deliver quality support and performance for any rider. What you’ll love: Backed by Burton’s legendary reputation, these snowboard bindings offer an advanced level of performance, control and comfort in a stylish package. The padding has a gel to absorb extra shock, and the bindings come in five color options. What you should consider: These bindings might be too expensive for beginner and intermediate riders. Salomon Pact Snowboard Bindings What you need to know: These versatile bindings are durable and affordable enough for almost any rider. What you’ll love: A solid choice for beginners, these snowboard bindings have a rear-entry design with high-quality straps for fine adjustments. Many users note their durability and comfort during long days of riding. What you should consider: These bindings have a limited number of size options, and the mounting discs may not attach to every board type. BURTON Grom Snowboard Bindings What you need to know: Designed for kids and small snowboarders, these popular bindings have a solid construction and reasonable price tag. What you’ll love: Perfect for young riders hitting the slopes for the first time, these beginner bindings are compatible with most snowboard mounting systems and feature a single-component baseplate for consistent control and responsiveness. They’re also available in two sleek color options, black and white. What you should consider: Some users questioned the quality and longevity of the bindings’ highback. Prices listed reflect time and date of publication and are subject to change. Check out our Daily Deals for the best products at the best prices and sign up here to receive the BestReviews weekly newsletter full of shopping inspo and sales. BestReviews spends thousands of hours researching, analyzing and testing products to recommend the best picks for most consumers. BestReviews and its newspaper partners may earn a commission if you purchase a product through one of our links.Amie Just: Could the Big 12 be left out of CFP? And, is Ohio State better than Oregon?
Playoff game at Ohio State has sold 34% more tickets than Notre Dame game on StubHubKurt's exclusion from UEFA's refereeing ranks is not just a mere administrative decision; it is a statement of values and principles that UEFA upholds in maintaining the credibility of football. By taking swift and decisive action, UEFA sends a clear message that any conduct that undermines the sport's integrity will not be tolerated.The neighborhood on the west side was another revelation. Friendly neighbors waved as they passed by on their evening strolls, and children played happily in the streets. It was a picture of community and camaraderie. In contrast, the east side neighborhood had been quiet to the point of loneliness, with neighbors keeping to themselves and no sense of connection or belonging. It was like moving from a ghost town to a bustling metropolis.
Guwahati, Nov 24 (PTI) Asserting that the BJP has always been focused on minority voters without any appeasement policies, Assam Chief Minister Himanta Biswa Sarma on Sunday said the party’s victory in the Karimganj Lok Sabha constituency in June and the recent bypoll in the Samaguri assembly seat reflects the success of its principal of treating all equally. Addressing a press conference here, he said the BJP has its roadmap defined for the minority-dominated seats for the 2026 assembly elections. “Our focus has always been on minority voters but with the principal ‘appeasement to none, justice to all’. It has also been reflected in our ‘sabka saath, sabka vikash’ motto,” he said. Sarma claimed that as a result of this non-appeasement policy, the BJP had won the Karimganj Lok Sabha seat and now the Samaguri assembly constituency, both of which have about 65 per cent Muslim voters. “Karimganj was the best and most critical result for me in the Lok Sabha polls. But everyone was writing about Jorhat and undermining Karinganj,” he said, referring to the attention to Congress leader Gaurav Gogoi’s victory. The CM said the BJP has its roadmap defined for minority-dominated seats for the assembly polls, and though it cannot make an impact in all, it has identified at least five-six constituencies to make inroads. “Keep an eye on Lahorighat, North and South Karimganj, Samaguri and Rupohi seats next elections. Whether BJP will win or not I cannot say, but we will give a good contest,” he stated. Sarma also claimed that the Badruddin Ajmal-led AIUDF not contesting in Samaguri this time has worked in favour of the BJP. “If the AIUDF had fielded its candidate, our votes would have gone to them. The AIUDF not being in the fray has worked for us,” he said. Describing the BJP-led ruling alliance’s victory in all the five assembly seats in the by-elections as an “unprecedented success”, the CM said, “Generally, bypolls ahead of general elections bring uncertainty for the ruling party and keep the government under pressure. But we are grateful to the people for their massive support. We were confident of winning four seats, but being able to get Samaguri out of Congress’s clutches after 25 years has been something else.” Besides Samaguri, bypolls were held in Behali, Dholai, Bongaigaon and Sidli. Accusing the press of giving more attention to Behali where Gogoi was campaigning, Sarma said, “When I tracked coverage last month, it felt like there were no readers or viewers in Dholai, Bongaigaon and Sidli.” Speaking at the felicitation programme for the three winning candidates at the BJP state headquarters later, Sarma said all of them were self-made with no political lineage. “Our ideal is Narendra Modi, Atal Behari Vajyapee, not some royal family. For Congress, their ideals are the royal family, Rahul Gandhi, Priyanka Gandhi,” he added. He also affirmed that the BJP remains committed to its allies, and pointed out that it left the Bongaigaon and Sidli seats to AGP and UPPL for the bypolls. “But the Congress snatched Behali from CPI(ML) Liberation, which had earlier contested there as the opposition alliance member,” he said. The CM said the bypolls were a reflection of the mood of the people in different parts of the state as all the assembly segments were located in specific geographical locations. Mentioning the victory in Samaguri, he said, “It was a tough seat for us as the demography there was different from those who have been voting for BJP so far. But our policy of equal development worked.” Referring to an attack on him while campaigning in Samaguri in 2016, he said, “It feels like justice that in the same panchayat where we had come under attack, we polled 49.5 per cent of the votes this time.” PTI SSG SSG SOM This report is auto-generated from PTI news service. ThePrint holds no responsibility for its content. var ytflag = 0;var myListener = function() {document.removeEventListener('mousemove', myListener, false);lazyloadmyframes();};document.addEventListener('mousemove', myListener, false);window.addEventListener('scroll', function() {if (ytflag == 0) {lazyloadmyframes();ytflag = 1;}});function lazyloadmyframes() {var ytv = document.getElementsByClassName("klazyiframe");for (var i = 0; i < ytv.length; i++) {ytv[i].src = ytv[i].getAttribute('data-src');}} Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. Δ document.getElementById( "ak_js_1" ).setAttribute( "value", ( new Date() ).getTime() );With the game hanging in the balance in the final minutes, it was Sabonis who stepped up when it mattered most. Facing tough defensive pressure, he remained composed and made key plays down the stretch, scoring crucial baskets and securing rebounds to seal the victory for the Pacers.
In a recent development, the Yunnan Fire Department's attempt to recruit 39 search and rescue dogs has come under scrutiny after reports indicated that only one-third of the dogs passed the recruitment exam. This disappointing result has sparked public concern and raised questions about the selection process for these highly specialized canines.The backlash against the designer quickly escalated, with harsh comments and accusations flooding social media platforms. The designer, who had always been vocal about their support for diversity and inclusion, was shocked by the vehement attacks and the misinterpretation of their intentions. As the situation spiraled out of control, it became evident that the criticism was based on a misunderstanding and a lack of context.