Pedro escaped punishment after swinging an arm at Bees substitute substitute Yehor Yarmoliuk without making contact. VAR reviewed the second-half incident but deemed there was no violent conduct. Frank and Brighton head coach Fabian Hurzeler disagreed about the decision. “As I understand the rules, you can’t swing your arm to try to hit someone,” said Frank. “If you hit them or not, it’s a red, that’s the way I understand the rules.” Frank spoke to the match officials, including referee Andy Madley, about the flashpoint at full-time. “They haven’t seen the situation yet, not on TV afterwards,” said Frank. “To be fair to him, I think the angle can be tricky so that’s why you’ve got VAR.” Asked about Frank’s assessment, Hurzeler replied: “Interesting opinion. I see it completely different. “For me, it’s not a red card. He tried to get free from a person.” Brighton were booed off after their winless run was stretched to six top-flight games. Albion dominated for large periods and hit the woodwork inside four minutes through Julio Enciso. Bees goalkeeper Mark Flekken made some important saves before being forced off injured in the 36th minute, albeit his replacement Hakon Valdimarsson was rarely tested on his Premier League debut. The Seagulls remain 10th ahead of Monday’s trip to Aston Villa, with Brentford a position and two points below moving towards their New Year’s Day showdown with Arsenal. Hurzeler thought the jeers at full-time were unfair. “The team doesn’t deserve that because in all the games we had in the last weeks they were all good, they were all intense, they were all where we thought we deserved more” said the German, whose team have lost to Fulham and Crystal Palace and drawn with Southampton, Leicester and West Ham in recent matches. “We try to work hard to satisfy our supporters, we try to give them what they deserve, we try to make them proud. “But the Premier League is tough. We know there will be (tough) periods we have to go through, especially with this young squad. “We try to stick together, find the positive and keep on going.” Brentford, who remain without a top-flight away win this term, had an early Yoane Wissa finish ruled out for offside following VAR intervention but barely threatened, despite an improved second-half showing. Frank, who is awaiting news on Flekken and defender Ben Mee, who also left the field injured, said: “I thought it was a fair point. “Brighton were better in the first half, no big, clearcut chances, and I thought we were better second half. “Overall, I’m happy with the performance, especially the way we defended. “We haven’t had too many clean sheets this season, so in that context I thought it was very impressive against a good Brighton team. “We know we have a lot of players out – we get two more injuries during the game. “The way the players showed their mentality and character and dug in was hugely impressive.”An upcoming hearing at The Supreme Court, which will decide if survivors of domestic violence are able to sue their abusers for “family violence,” could result in consequences for survivors, warns one legal advocacy non-profit. In February, 2025, Canada’s Supreme Court will decide if family violence is recognized as a tort – a civil wrong, for which someone could be held liable. If recognized, the decision would allow for family court cases over family violence, giving survivors of domestic violence the option to sue their abusers for family violence. But the National Association of Women and the Law (NAWL), which is set to appear before the Supreme Court alongside other organizations and stakeholders to present the implications of the decision, is concerned the new tort could give abusers an avenue to sue their victims. “Often, what we see is abusers using remedies that are meant for survivors and kind of twisting them and using them to their advantage,” said Suzanne Zaccour, director of legal affairs at NAWL, in an interview with rabble.ca . “We think abusers may try to use this tort of family violence to sue their own victims.” How parental alienation arguments target survivors Zaccour’s main concern is the argument of parental alienation, a tactic that is increasingly used in custody battles in Canadian courtrooms. The argument is often used by abusers in family court cases when a woman alleges their partner is abusive, Zaccour explained. Sometimes, the abusive party will claim that the other party has been psychologically manipulating their child and turning them against them by repeatedly badmouthing them to their child or falsely accusing them of abuse. In some cases, if the court believes allegations of abuse were falsified to alienate a child from their parent, abusers can be awarded custody of their children. A UN report , released this summer, called the concept “highly gendered”, “unfounded and unscientific”, highlighting that it is “predominantly used against mothers”. Zaccour worries that if the Supreme Court decides to recognize a tort of family violence, abusers will be able to argue that parental alienation is family violence – and that this could force victims to pay damages to their abusers. “We’re seeing that courts are already imposing costs on survivors, taking kids away from them,” Zaccour said. “We think it is likely that courts could also make them pay damages.” “They’re going to say ‘well, my ex alienated the children’ if their children don’t want to see them because they’re violent,” Zaccor explained. “They’re going to say ‘this constitutes family violence, so, she needs to pay me.’” What safeguards are needed NAWL is supportive of recognizing family violence as a tort that can be used in family court – but only with appropriate safeguards. Zaccour hopes that their intervention at the Supreme Court will highlight the implications of the decision and result in protections for survivors being written in. “We’re hoping to inform the court of these risks and, ultimately, make sure that there are some safeguards in the decision,” she said, “to encourage them if they decide to recognize this tort that they do so carefully, making sure judges are instructed appropriately.” Still, Zaccour thinks there is a simpler solution – banning the concept of parental alienation from family court altogether. “They need to legislate that you cannot use this unscientific theory in court cases,” she said. In January, a coalition of over 250 Canadian feminist organizations, including NAWL, sent letters to Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and Minister of Justice Arif Viranion, urging the government to remove the concept from family law cases. The concept has yet to be removed. Zaccour warned that, if not removed, the concept will continue to be used as a strategy to further target survivors of domestic violence, both in custody battles and in future family violence cases, should the tort be recognized. “If the government doesn’t act, abusers will continue to use this,” she said. “We have to make sure that women don’t face even more consequences.” Support rabble today! We’re so glad you stopped by! Thanks for consuming rabble content this year. rabble.ca is 100% reader and donor funded, so as an avid reader of our content, we hope you will consider gifting rabble with a donation during our summer fundraiser today. Nick Seebruch, editor Whether it be a one-time donation or a small monthly contribution, your support is critical to keep rabble writers producing the work you’ve come to rely on as a part of a healthy media diet. Become a rabble rouser — donate to rabble.ca today. Nick Seebruch, editor Support rabble.ca
India News Today Live Updates: Trending India News brings you the most significant stories and developments from across the nation, covering everything from politics and economy to culture and technology. Whether it's a major policy change, a groundbreaking legal verdict, or the latest in entertainment and sports, we ensure you don't miss out on the news that's shaping the nation. Our in-depth coverage and timely updates keep you informed about the trends that are making headlines in India today. Stay connected to the pulse of the nation with Trending India News. India News Today Live: MGNREGS funding likely to remain unchanged in FY26 amid rural recovery
S.T.A.L.K.E.R. 2: From Legacy to LegendIs Elon Musk Using X To Target H-1B Visa Critics? Allegations Of Censorship Surface
Two #data brokers banned from selling ‘sensitive’ location #data by the FTC
Next: exquisite fishing