首页 > 646 jili 777

magic hotpot ocean chapter karachi menu

2025-01-12
Shedeur Sanders often draws attention to himself. But usually, its for his standout passing ability while leading Colorado to wins. On Saturday, however, the Buffaloes' star quarterback found himself at the center of a pair of controversial players. No. 16 Colorado faced a deficit throughout its Week 13 matchup against Kansas. And in the second half, Sanders was spotted putting his hands on an official. That came after the Buffaloes quarterback took a massive hit to the legs in the first half — one that wasn't penalized, which stirred up debate across social media. Here's a look at the two buzzworthy plays involving Sanders from Saturday, the first being his physical interaction with an official, then the uncalled hit he took against the Jayhawks. NCAAF HQ: Live NCAAF scores | Updated NCAAF standings | Full NCAAF schedule Shedeur Sanders pushes referee in Colorado vs. Kansas In the frustration of Colorado trailing Kansas in the second half, Fox's broadcast team caught Sanders approaching a referee, then giving him a shove from behind after a play was over. After the network showed the clip, Fox rules analyst Mike Pereira said Sanders was "lucky he wasn't ejected from the game." "He's lucky he wasn't ejected from the game." @MikePereira takes a closer look at Shedeur Sanders' push on the ref ⬇️ pic.twitter.com/SSESj7QtId Sanders remained in the game after the interaction, but players are often immediately ejected for physically interacting with an official. The Buffaloes likely got a huge break with the officials either not noticing Sanders' shove — or seeing it, but opting to not punish the star player. Shedeur Sanders takes controversial hit vs. Kansas Sanders was the subject of controversy earlier in the game as well, but for a much different reason. After he clearly had already thrown a pass and wasn't a threat to make a play, a Kansas defender came flying in, taking Sanders down with a shot to his legs. Kansas with a big hit on Shedeur Sanders 😬 pic.twitter.com/5jXVaGb1Rh No penalty was called on the play. College football fans, though, immediately suggested that the Jayhawks should have been called for roughing the passer as a result of the low hit. Such a dirty hit on Shedeur Sanders, how is this NOT a flag? Terrible pic.twitter.com/kMIiYqAqwnRock Island rolls again, remains unbeaten at 3-0magic hotpot ocean chapter karachi menu

"Negative Politics Lost": PM Modi On Maharashtra Election ResultsNebraska 44, Wisconsin 25



No. 24 Louisville women use 16-0 4th-quarter run to beat Colorado 79-71NEW YORK, Dec. 2 (Xinhua) -- U.S. stocks ended mixed on Monday. The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 128.65 points, or 0.29 percent, to 44,782.0. The S&P 500 added 14.77 points, or 0.24 percent, to 6,047.15. The Nasdaq Composite Index increased 185.78 points, or 0.97 percent, to 19,403.95. Eight of the 11 primary S&P 500 sectors ended in red, with utilities and real estate leading the laggards by dropping 2.08 percent and 1.44 percent, respectively. Meanwhile, communication services and consumer discretionary led the gainers by going up 1.45 percent and 1.06 percent, respectively.Up 860% in the last 12 months alone, Summit Therapeutics ( SMMT -2.53% ) is a skyrocketing stock that likely has more upside in store. Nonetheless, rapid gains like that tend to imply some downside risk for new investors, and this biotech is no exception. So, let's uncover the hidden risk here and what you need to know about it. This company's fate isn't entirely in its own hands Since it doesn't have any revenue yet, Summit's strategy is to license its pipeline assets from Akesobio , a larger biotech based in China. Its lead program and only clinical-stage candidate, an antibody called ivonescimab, is no exception. Although ivonescimab is approved for treating non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) by China's National Medical Products Administration, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in the U.S., or any other regulatory agency, is yet to approve it. Summit is thus performing a pair of phase 3 clinical trials in the U.S. testing the antibody for the same indications, hoping to generate a dataset that regulators at the FDA will find compelling enough to grant the approval for commercialization. A third phase 3 trial is planned, and it's expected to start in 2025. So, there is a well-known risk (to biopharma investors, at least) of those clinical trials failing to replicate Akesobio's results or otherwise failing to impress regulators in the U.S. But with no independently developed pipeline programs to its name, Summit is likely planning to continue to license additional programs from Akesobio rather than investing in early-stage research and development (R&D) . That could be a sustainable and ultimately very profitable strategy, because the Chinese biotech is investigating ivonescimab for a slew of additional indications beyond NSCLC, including head and neck cancer, ovarian cancer, colorectal cancer, and several others. Success with those programs would thus expand ivonescimab's total addressable market without requiring much in the way of a commitment up front from Summit. Alas, that's also the source of the stock's hidden risk, and it's a fierce one. If Akesobio fails in any of its ongoing or future clinical trials with ivonescimab, it will sharply dent the drug's addressable market -- and Summit's stock will be dented right along with it. The fact that it hasn't yet signed on the dotted line to license any additional indications from Akesobio doesn't matter; there is every indication that for Summit, Akesobio's pipeline is the only game in town when it comes to near-term opportunities for growth. Furthermore, unless ivonescimab is a cancer wonder drug of some kind (something that nobody should be betting on), stumbles in drug development are inevitable -- and, unfortunately, especially likely for applications in oncology. Things could still turn out for the best Don't rush to sell this company's stock on the basis of the significant risk waiting in the wings. In Summit's context, Akesobio's clinical setbacks could be good buying opportunities , provided the therapy aces clinical trials next time around, of course. From a financial standpoint, this is more than likely. As of the third quarter, Summit has $487 million in cash, cash equivalents, and short-term investments. Its R&D expenses were only around $38 million. Even with the planned expansions of the ivonescimab clinical trials next year, this company will still have enough cash to continue pursuing its licensing-based strategy for quite some time before it will need to consider raising more capital. Therefore, as its near-term needs for capital are minimal, damage to its share price is not an impediment, since it likely won't be issuing more shares anytime soon to keep the lights on. In other words, as long as Akesobio has more clinical trials ongoing and in the works, Summit can likely weather a few failures of its partner, even if it's a little painful for shareholders. That calculation will change if ivonescimab whiffs on most of its clinical trial objectives, of course. For now, it isn't worth avoiding Summit's stock. While it does face considerable risks, some of which are out of its hands, it also has the benefit of being somewhat shielded from the very high risks of burning money on early-stage clinical trials. Still, one thing is clear: To know where Summit Therapeutics' stock is going, keep your eyes on Akesobio.

Aduro Clean Technologies Announces Voting Results for Election of Directors

Previous: magic hotpot ocean chapter karachi
Next: magic hotpot ocean chapter karachi photos