crown89 net slot game
The 1,078 signatories denounce the genocide and call for cutting ties with Israeli institutions that fail to condemn it. On October 7, 2023, Hamas carried out a terrorist attack in Israel, killing more than 1,200 people out of a population of 9.5 million, including over 800 civilians and at least 33 children, and injuring 5,400 more. The attack also led to the capture of 248 hostages, around 100 of whom are still held in Gaza. Since then, the Israeli government has launched a response of genocidal violence against Gaza’s Palestinian population, under the eyes of the international community. By late October 2024, identified victims had reached 43,061 , including over 13,735 children, 7,216 women, and 3,447 elderly people, with over 100,000 injured, in a population of 2.3 million. Thousands of additional victims remain buried beneath the rubble, uncounted. The Israeli military is now inflicting upon Palestinian civilians at least the equivalent of an October 7 every ten days, and has done so for more than a year. UN Secretary-General António Guterres has described the situation in Gaza as a “crisis of humanity”. In addition to the heavy toll on civilians, this war has led to the massive destruction of Palestinian civilian infrastructure and has forced 90 percent of Gaza’s population into repeated displacement. Most hospitals have been bombed and destroyed, and numerous medical teams have been killed. Constant attacks and blockades on food, water, fuel, medicines, and humanitarian aid cause unbearable suffering for Gaza’s population, who are facing starvation and infectious disease. Children, along with other vulnerable groups, are particularly badly affected. In late October 2024, the Palestinian Ministry of Education, based in Ramallah, reported that Israel had killed over 11,057 schoolchildren and 681 students in Gaza since October 7, 2023, and injured over 16,897 schoolchildren and 1,468 students. In total, 441 teachers and education personnel have been killed, and 2,491 injured. At least 117 academics in Gaza have been killed, including Sufian Tayeh , mathematician, theoretical physicist, and president of the Islamic University of Gaza, who was killed along with his family by an Israeli bombing in the Jabaliya refugee camp on December 2, 2023. Additionally, 406 schools in Gaza have been damaged, with 77 completely destroyed. Gaza’s universities have been gravely impacted, with 20 institutions damaged, 51 buildings completely demolished, and 57 partially destroyed. As a result, nearly 88,000 students and 700,000 schoolchildren in Gaza have been deprived of education for more than a year. On January 26, 2024, the International Court of Justice (ICJ) ruled that there was a risk of genocide and ordered Israel to take measures to prevent it. On March 28, the ICJ reiterated this order, requiring implementation of these preventive measures. Then, on May 24, the ICJ ordered Israel to immediately halt its military offensive in Rafah and to open the Rafah crossing to allow unimpeded access to humanitarian services and aid for civilians. These orders seem to have been entirely disregarded, and attacks on civilians in Gaza have intensified , especially in the north, with a clear aim to depopulate this region of Palestinians. On September 30, 2024, after days of aerial bombardment, the Israeli military also invaded Lebanon, killing at least 1,600 people and displacing 1.2 million. Israeli government human rights violations extend beyond the Gaza Strip and do not begin as a reprisal for the October 7, 2023, Hamas attack. In the West Bank, since October 7, 2023, 79 schoolchildren and 35 students have been killed, with hundreds more injured or arrested. Systematic, widespread human rights violations , such as land confiscation, resource plundering, and racial discrimination, have been well-documented over 57 years of occupation of Palestinian territories and 17 years of Gaza’s blockade. On July 19, 2024, the ICJ issued an advisory opinion on “the legal consequences arising from Israel’s policies and practices in the Occupied Palestinian Territory (OPT), including East Jerusalem and Gaza”, unequivocally declaring Israel’s occupation illegal and calling for its immediate cessation. The ICJ underscored that the responsibility not to support this illegal practice falls not only on third-party states but also on all institutions that uphold international law, including universities. The scientific community has often mobilised in the past to defend human rights and international law. In an open letter published in the New York Times in December 1948, cosigned by Hannah Arendt and Albert Einstein, the authors denounced the visit of Menahem Begin, leader of the Tnuat Haherut party, precursor to Likud (the party of current Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu), in these terms: “Among the most disturbing political phenomena of our times is the emergence in the newly created state of Israel of the “Freedom Party” (Tnuat Haherut), a political party closely akin in its organization, methods, political philosophy and social appeal to the Nazi and Fascist parties. It was formed out of the membership and following of the former Irgun Zvai Leumi, a terrorist, right-wing, chauvinist organization in Palestine.... It is in its actions that the terrorist party betrays its real character; from its past actions we can judge what it may be expected to do in the future. A shocking example was their behavior in the Arab village of Deir Yassin. This village, off the main roads and surrounded by Jewish lands, had taken no part in the war, and had even fought off Arab bands who wanted to use the village as their base. On April 9, terrorist bands attacked this peaceful village, which was not a military objective in the fighting, killed most of its inhabitants – 240 men, women, and children – and kept a few of them alive to parade as captives through the streets of Jerusalem. Most of the Jewish community was horrified at the deed, and the Jewish Agency sent a telegram of apology to King Abdullah of Trans-Jordan. But the terrorists, far from being ashamed of their act, were proud of this massacre, publicized it widely, and invited all the foreign correspondents present in the country to view the heaped corpses and the general havoc at Deir Yassin.” For more than a year now, the Israeli government and its military forces have been committing the equivalent of a Deir Yassin massacre every day in Gaza, while the scientific community largely remains silent. Yet, as the open letter above demonstrates, this community has already strongly opposed attacks on civilians, whether during the Algerian and Vietnam wars or, more recently, in response to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. Scientists, particularly mathematicians, cannot remain indifferent to the ongoing genocide in Gaza, especially as Western powers appear to support this crime against humanity politically, diplomatically, and militarily. Enough is enough. We urge our colleagues to cease all scientific collaboration with Israeli institutions that do not explicitly condemn the genocide in Gaza and the illegal colonisation of Palestine. We also encourage them to put pressure on our own institutions to terminate agreements with these partners under the same conditions, in accordance with international law. This position obviously does not include individual collaborations with Israeli colleagues, 3,400 of whom have courageously signed a call to the international community, which we wish to support, “to intervene immediately by applying any possible sanctions against Israel to achieve an immediate ceasefire between Israel and its neighbors, for the future of the people living in Israel/Palestine and the region, and to guarantee their right to security and life.” Finally, we demand that our institutions scrupulously respect academic freedoms and resolutely uphold freedom of expression in accordance with the law. Signatories (petition closed on December 4, 2024 with 1078 signatories): Ahmed Abbes, directeur de recherche au CNRS, France Samy Abbes, Maître de conférences, Université Paris Cité, France Maha Abboud, Professeure, CY Cergy Paris Université, France Nahla Abdellatif, Professor, Ecole Nationale d’Ingénieur de Tunis, Tunis El Manar university, Tunisia Amine Abdellaziz, Docteur de l’Université Grenoble Alpes, France Chaima Abid, PhD in applied mathematics/LAMSIN, Tunisia Hammadi Abidi, Professor University of Tunis El Manar, Tunisia Mohammed Ably, Maître de conférences, Université de Lille, France Abdelhak Abouqateb, Professor, Cadi Ayyad University, Morocco Tiago Miguel Abreu, PhD student at Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Brazil Khader Faiez Abu-Helaiel, Profesor en la Universidad de Jaén, Spain Vincent Acary, Directeur de recherche à l’INRIA, France Celine Acary-Robert, Ingénieur de recherche, UGA , France Fessel Achhoud, PhD student, University Hassan first, Morocco Boris Adamczewski, Director of Research at CNRS, France Louigi Addario-Berry, Professor, Canada Research Chair, McGill University, Canada Karim Adiprasito, Directeur de recherche au CNRS, IMJ-PRG, France Dan Agüero Cerna, Postdoc, SISSA, Italy Marie-Thérèse Aimar, Maîtresse de Conférences émérite Aix-Marseille Université, France Sabah Al Fakir, Ancien professeur université scientifique de Lille, France Safaa Al-Ali, Postdoctoral researcher, Centre INRIA de l’Université Côte d’Azur, France Darío Alatorre, Outreach technician, Institute of Mathematics, UNAM, México Baklouti Ali, Professor, Faculty of Sciences of Sfax, Tunisia Roberto Alicandro, Professor, University of Naples Federico II, Italy Mohamed Aliouane, PhD student , SISSA, Italy Nasrin Altafi, Postdoc at Queen’s university, Canada Tuna Altınel, Maître de Conférences, Université Lyon 1, France María de la Paz Alvarez-Scherer, Retired, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México Saber Amdouni, Associate Professor, Ecole Nationale d’Ingénieur de Tunis, Tunis El Manar university, Tunisia Silviana Amethyst, Research Engineer, Max Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics, Germany Omid Amini, CNRS – École Polytechnique, France Claire Amiot, Professeur, Université Grenoble Alpes, France Farid Ammar Khodja, Maître de conférences, Université de Franche-Comté, France Cherif Amrouche, Professeur Emérite Université de Pau et des Pays de l’Adour, France Abdelhamid Amroun, MCF Université Paris-Saclay, France U.K. Anandavardhanan, Professor, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, India Yves André, Directeur de recherches CNRS, France Angel Angel, Professor universidad politécnica de Madrid, Spain Daniele Angella, Professor, Dipartimento di Matematica e Informatica “Ulisse Dini”, Università di Firenze, Italy Pablo Angulo, Profesor PCD en excedencia – Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Spain Jean-Philippe Anker, Professeur émérite, Université d’Orléans, France Colette Anné, mathématicienne retraitée (CNRS), France A full list of all signatories can be found here . The views expressed in this article are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect Al Jazeera’s editorial stance.CEO killer suspect: golden boy who soured on US health systemHome Bargains shoppers race to bag £15 dupe of posh £230 scented candle
Google’s Whisk Reimagines AI Image Creation: Ditch the Text, Embrace the VisualWilliams' 19 lead East Texas A&M over Abilene Christian 68-67Super Micro Computer 's stock soared more than 30% on Nov. 19 after it appointed a new independent auditor and submitted a compliance plan to Nasdaq to avoid a potential delisting. Those announcements addressed its two pressing issues: the departure of its auditor Ernst & Young in October, and a delayed filing for its 10-K report, which could cause its stock to be delisted. But even after that rally, Supermicro's stock remains 76% below its all-time high from this March. The server maker's shares are still being weighed down by concerns about its sliding gross margins, competition from bigger server makers like Dell Technologies and Hewlett Packard Enterprise , and troubling allegations of inflated revenues from a prolific short seller. Its delayed annual report and loss of Ernst & Young seemed to support that bearish thesis, and the Department of Justice (DOJ) is reportedly getting ready to probe Supermicro's business. Supermicro's stock looks dirt cheap at 8 times forward earnings , but it will likely trade at that discount until it fully resolves its accounting and regulatory issues. So instead of betting on Supermicro's long-shot turnaround, investors would probably be better off sticking with these two millionaire-maker blue chip AI stocks instead: Microsoft ( MSFT 1.00% ) and Broadcom ( AVGO 0.18% ) . The AI software leader: Microsoft Microsoft generated a total return of more than 900% over the past decade. That rally, which was mainly driven by the explosive growth of its cloud business, would have turned a $100,000 investment into more than $1 million. Microsoft turned into a growth stock again after Satya Nadella, who became its CEO in 2014, drove the company to transform its desktop-based software into cloud-based services and mobile apps. It also turned Azure into the world's second-largest cloud infrastructure platform and expanded its hardware and gaming businesses. Over the past five years, Microsoft ramped up its investments in OpenAI, the creator of ChatGPT, and integrated the start-up's generative AI tools into its own search and cloud services. Thanks to that foresight, it tethered more businesses and consumers to its cloud ecosystem, and it gained a first-mover's advantage against Alphabet 's Google and other tech giants in the nascent generative AI market. In fiscal 2024 (which ended this June), Microsoft's AI-driven transformation boosted its total cloud revenues by 23% to $135 billion -- which represented 55% of its top line. From fiscal 2024 to fiscal 2027, analysts expect its revenue and earnings per share (EPS) to grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 14% and 15%, respectively. Its stock still looks reasonably valued at 28 times next year's earnings, and it will likely remain a top play on the AI market for years to come. The AI chipmaking play: Broadcom Broadcom, which was known as Avago before it took over the original Broadcom in 2016, has generated a total return of 2,300% over the past 10 years. That rally would have turned a $50,000 investment into $1.2 million. Broadcom's semiconductor business sells a broad range of chips for the mobile, wireless, networking, data storage, and industrial markets. But over the past few years, it built a massive infrastructure software business by acquiring CA Technologies, Symantec's enterprise security division, and the cloud software giant VMware. Broadcom's chipmaking and software businesses are both growing. But over the past two years, its sales of networking and optical chips for the AI-oriented data center market skyrocketed as more companies upgraded their infrastructure. For fiscal 2024 (which ended in October), it expects its sales of AI-oriented chips to roughly triple to $12 billion, or nearly a quarter of its projected sales for the full year. That rapid growth should offset its slower sales of non-AI chips and infrastructure software, which are both more sensitive to macro headwinds. From fiscal 2024 to fiscal 2026, analysts expect Broadcom's revenue to grow at a CAGR of 15% as its EPS increases at a CAGR of 124%. That earnings growth should be driven by brisk sales of AI chips and the expansion of its higher-margin software business. Its stock might seem a bit pricey at 42 times forward earnings, but its track record of smart acquisitions, high exposure to the AI market, and robust growth could justify that higher valuation.
Exploring a New Era in Gaming Economics In the rapidly evolving world of gaming, a groundbreaking development known as the “PM Stock” system is set to redefine how players perceive in-game economies. PM Stock, short for “Player Market Stock,” merges financial market principles with virtual gaming environments, allowing players to invest in game assets as if they were stocks in the real world. How It Works This innovative concept operates on a dynamic in-game market platform where the value of items, characters, and other assets fluctuate based on player demand, successful gameplay, and periodic market events. Players can buy “shares” in rare items or characters, watching their investments grow as those in-game entities gain popularity or become more potent through updates and expansions. Implications for Players The PM Stock system introduces a layer of strategic depth previously unseen in gaming. Players can analyze in-game market trends, predict shifts, and make informed decisions akin to real-world trading. This challenges gamers’ strategic thinking, encouraging a novel form of engagement that bridges traditional gameplay with the excitement and unpredictability of stock market dynamics. A Glimpse Into the Future As developers embrace this forward-thinking concept, the potential for PM Stock could vastly increase player involvement and community interaction. Future games could see collaborations with real-world stock analysts, creating unique events, or even educational tie-ins for economic literacy. As gaming technology continues to advance, the PM Stock system represents a bold step towards interactive entertainment that thrives on realism and player agency. Transforming Gaming Economies: The Innovative Impact of PM Stock As the gaming industry continues to expand globally, groundbreaking innovations like the “PM Stock” system are poised to revolutionize the economics of virtual worlds. This novel concept merges the mechanics of financial markets with the immersive environments of video games, offering players a unique opportunity to engage with in-game assets in ways similar to investing in real-world stocks. The PM Stock system operates on a sophisticated in-game market platform that mirrors the dynamics of a real stock market. Here, players can invest in various game assets—including items, characters, and upgrades—as if they were buying shares. These assets’ values fluctuate based on multiple factors such as player demand, frequency of use in popular strategies, and changes introduced by game updates or expansions. By embedding financial elements into games, developers are enabling more strategic and nuanced gameplay experiences. The introduction of PM Stock into gaming ecosystems can significantly enhance player engagement and strategic depth. It empowers players to make data-driven decisions by analyzing in-game market trends, predicting asset value shifts, and reacting to market events with calculated strategies. This not only enriches the gameplay experience but also educates players on market fundamentals in a fun and interactive way. Despite its promising potential, the PM Stock system also presents certain challenges. Balancing the in-game economy to prevent market manipulation is crucial, as is ensuring that the market remains accessible to all players, not just those with the financial prowess to invest heavily. Moreover, developers must work to create secure trading environments to prevent exploitation and to maintain fairness among players. Looking ahead, the PM Stock system could pave the way for even more interconnected gaming experiences. Developers may collaborate with real-world financial analysts to integrate more sophisticated trading mechanics, potentially offering educational partnerships that highlight economic literacy. This innovation sits at the intersection of gaming, finance, and education, promising a future where virtual economies are as nuanced and vibrant as their real-world counterparts. In light of these developments, gaming companies are exploring integrations with blockchain technology to facilitate secure, transparent transactions. This movement reflects broader industry trends focusing on player empowerment and decentralization within gaming economies. Such innovations signify a shift towards more player-centric game design, where players have significant influence over virtual market outcomes. For more information on gaming and financial innovations, visit Google Play and Steam , two of the leading platforms in the digital gaming industry.