Kinder Morgan Inc. stock falls Wednesday, still outperforms marketArne Slot's Liverpool secured the win in their final Premier League match of the year 2024. Liverpool created a dominant display in their away game against West Ham. Luis Diaz opened the scoring for Liverpool in the 30th minute. Cody Gakpo and Mohamed Salah scored a goal each, taking Liverpool to a 3-0 advantage in the first half. The second half also proved fruitful for the visitors as Trent Alexander-Arnold and Diogo Jota struck a goal each. Liverpool successfully maintained a clean sheet against West Ham and will stay at the top of the Premier League 2024-25 standings. Manchester City Registers Much-Needed 2–0 Victory Over Leicester During Mark Guardiola’s 500th Game in Charge for Man City. The story from the London Stadium as @LFC win big 📈 #WHULIV pic.twitter.com/sC3AY2acKy — Premier League (@premierleague) December 29, 2024 (SocialLY brings you all the latest breaking news, viral trends and information from social media world, including Twitter (X), Instagram and Youtube. The above post is embeded directly from the user's social media account and LatestLY Staff may not have modified or edited the content body. The views and facts appearing in the social media post do not reflect the opinions of LatestLY, also LatestLY does not assume any responsibility or liability for the same.)First downs and second guesses: Tony White leaving is no shocker. He could have left last year with the right offer. He made a difference. He helped build a good defensive culture. White is making a chess move to a future head coaching job, but it’s got a risk. He’s going to work for a Florida State head coach on the hot seat. Mike Norvell is hiring White and offensive coordinator Gus Malzahn to help save his job. FSU was a mess this season. I’m guessing the portal this off-season will make a bigger difference than the coordinators. Who should NU go after? I’d start with Syracuse defensive coordinator Elijah Robinson, who has connections with Rhule. You can hang out on my lawn (no flags please) if you want. But Old Man Football has some things to get off his chest. College football needs some adults to step up. The sport had a rough weekend. Great games were overshadowed by the images of fights and torn flags. It was ridiculous. When did planting a flag become an important thing? What does that even mean? That you conquered the field? It means winning isn’t enough. You have to rub your opponents’ nose in defeat. Hey Michigan: wasn’t that your fourth straight win over Ohio State? That means you won at Ohio Stadium two years ago, right? So why are you acting like it was Michigan’s first-ever win over Ohio State? Meanwhile, Buckeyes coach Ryan Day is watching the chaos much like Kevin Bacon in “Animal House.” Remain calm. All is well. On the flip side of this, when did the midfield logo become the sacred ground of college football? Teams stomp on the logo all game, bodies are slammed, blood spilled on it. But before and after it needs security detail? It’s part of the football field. Don’t plant a flag on it. Don’t worry if somebody steps on it. The best midfield logo I ever saw was the diamond-shaped “Big 8” logo at Memorial Stadium. Let’s go back to that. Let’s go back to respecting the game, and the opponent, too. Nebraska needs a lesson in that after the no-hand shake event on Friday. This is a generational debate. I’ve heard from both sides of Nebraska fans on this. My take: if you don’t respect your opponent, you don’t respect the game, either. Both are a problem. The handshake should be part of the Nebraska football identity. Attention to detail. Not creating needless distractions. Play the right way. All are important to the ultimate goal: winning. Is the pre-game drama the reason Iowa won? No. But it makes you wonder what are the priorities at Nebraska. Like the 2020 game when the Huskers complained about clapping while the quarterback called the signals. What’s the focus on? Lack of respect was a two-way street in Iowa City on Friday. Hawkeye linebacker Jay Higgins went up to Nebraska coach Matt Rhule and said that not shaking hands was a bad idea. I’ve never heard of a Nebraska player ever getting in the face of an opposing coach. Not Barry Switzer. Not Bill McCartney. Not any of them. I’m guessing if someone had done that to Kirk Ferentz, we’d never hear the end of it. Player entitlement is the rage in college football. They’re getting paid. That’s a good thing. But they’re also becoming bolder with their actions. Not all of it is good. Rivalries are fun. Rivalries are emotional. That’s what makes them great. It’s the extra rubbing the opponent’s face in it that crosses the line for me. Take the W, and the L, and head back to the locker room and wait until next time. The Nebraska-Iowa rivalry has never been hotter. I’d like to see coaches Ferentz and Rhule get control of it. We don’t need a flag plant or a brawl after next season’s game. I feel like we're headed that way. You know, a cool tradition to start in this rivalry would be a pre-game handshake from the teams at midfield. Oh, wait. That’s the Captains’ coin toss. There’s been a moment of civility and respect in the Iowa-Nebraska series. I saw it last January at the Outland Trophy Dinner in Omaha. The Outland honored Dan Young and Reese Morgan with the Tom Osborne Legacy Award. Both were high school coaches in Nebraska and Iowa and assistant coaches at NU and Iowa. There was a lot of love and respect in that room that night, including Ferentz and a group from Iowa City to represent Morgan. Iowa-Nebraska can be intense, nasty and emotional — and still about respect. Nebraskans and Iowans are actually a lot more alike than either side will ever admit. That’s what makes it such a good rivalry. There’s not much Creighton volleyball can do about being a No. 6 overall seed, other than winning at Nebraska or Louisville. Then again, that’s what CU is going to have to do — at Penn State — to get to the Final Four. Until the Big East gets built up in volleyball, that’s the bottom line. If Nebraska and Creighton both make the Final Four, guess who would meet in the national semifinals on Dec. 19? Get local news delivered to your inbox!
The One Thing You Should Never Do With Your Bone-In Meat At SteakhousesWHITE SULPHUR SPRINGS, W. Va. (AP) — Jordan Sears scored 25 points, Jalen Reed had 21 points and 13 rebounds, and LSU defeated UCF 109-102 in triple overtime on Sunday to take third place at the Greenbrier Tip-Off. LSU trailed by 18 points early in the second half, then failed to hold a lead at the end of regulation and each of the first two overtime periods. The Tigers went up by five with a minute to go in the third overtime. UCF cut it to three, then Vyctorius Miller made a driving layup, Jordan Sears followed with a dunk and the Tigers were able to hold on when leading by seven. Cam Carter scored 20 points, Miller had 16 and Dji Bailey 14 for LSU (5-1). Darius Johnson had 25 points, eight assists and six rebounds for UCF (4-2). Keyshawn Hall had 21 points and 10 rebounds, and Jordan Ivy-Curry scored 20. South Florida led by 15 points at halftime and maintained a double-digit lead for all but a few possessions in the first 11 1/2 minutes of the second half. UCF led 62-48 with 8 1/2 minutes remaining but Sears hit three 3-pointers and LSU drew to within 64-59 with 6 minutes to go. The Tigers scored the last six points of regulation to force overtime. In the first half, LSU led 15-13 about eight minutes into the game but the Tigers missed 15 of 16 shots while being outscored 25-3 over the next 10 minutes. South Florida led 40-25 at halftime after shooting 46% to 25% for LSU. ___ Get poll alerts and updates on the AP Top 25 throughout the season. Sign up here . AP college basketball: https://apnews.com/hub/ap-top-25-college-basketball-poll and https://apnews.com/hub/college-basketball
Jake Okechukwu Effoduh is an assistant professor at the Lincoln Alexander School of Law, Toronto Metropolitan University in Canada. He is an international lawyer and human rights activist and serves as a member of the World Economic Forum’s Global Future Council on Frontier Risks, focusing on identifying key future shocks and proposing policy opportunities to build resilience against global risks. In this interview with KENNETH ATHEKAME , he spoke on a number of issues, including the some of the frontier risks the global community will likely confront; how governments, businesses, and international organisation can mitigate the risks; his human rights activism, and his vision for the future of global human rights. Excerpts: What are the most critical frontier risks that the global community faces in the next decade, and why are they particularly challenging? The proverb “When the music changes, so do the dance” reminds us that as our world evolves, so do the challenges we face. In the coming decade, the global community will confront several critical frontier risks. Top of my prediction is the risk associated with Artificial Intelligence (AI) and automation. While AI offers immense potential, it also poses risks such as job displacement, algorithmic colonization, and the amplification of existing inequalities, especially in regions like Africa. The challenge lies in harnessing the benefits of this tech while mitigating adverse effects. Another thing that is obvious is Climate Change. As we see, the increasing frequency of extreme weather events threatens food security, livelihoods, and infrastructure. For our people, we live in a continent heavily reliant on agriculture, so this presents a formidable challenge. And then lastly, with how the COVID-19 pandemic left a devastating impact on global health, future pandemics could even be more disruptive, particularly in regions with limited healthcare infrastructure. And lest I forget, another frontier risk is cybersecurity threats, which I often speak about because as digital integration deepens, vulnerabilities to cyber-attacks increase. We are seeing more and more risks to national security and even economies. These risks are particularly challenging, and this is so because of their interconnected nature, as well as rapid evolution. We need international solidarity and some form of global coordination to address them effectively. How do you define ‘frontier risks,’ and how do they differ from conventional risks? “Frontier risks” are unprecedented, high-impact challenges that emerge from the cutting edges of technological, environmental, and societal change. Unlike conventional risks, which are often known and manageable through existing frameworks, frontier risks are characterized by uncertainty, complexity, and the potential for systemic disruption. They require innovative approaches and proactive governance to navigate effectively. What actions should governments, businesses, and international organisations prioritise to mitigate emerging frontier risks? To mitigate emerging frontier risks, a collaborative and multifaceted approach is essential. We need to engage diverse stakeholders, including marginalized communities, in policy formulation to ensure that our interventions are equitable and effective. We also need to equip populations with the knowledge and skills necessary to adapt to technological advancements and the shifting economic landscapes we are witnessing. I don’t think we have strong enough infrastructure, so we need to develop resilient infrastructure capable of withstanding environmental and cyber threats. How do you see public-private partnerships (PPPs) evolving to address complex and interconnected risks such as climate change, pandemics, or AI governance in Africa? In Africa, public-private partnerships are poised to play a pivotal role in addressing complex risks, especially when it comes to resource mobilisation. I think PPPs can pool the much-needed resources to fund large-scale initiatives, such as renewable energy projects, that combat climate change. Also, when it comes to innovation and tech transfer, collaborations can facilitate the transfer of cutting-edge technologies and best practices to address things like the current health crises and will help enhance AI governance. The public sector can rely on private sector expertise, and then the private sector can complement public sector efforts in building robust systems and infrastructure. That’s the kind of symbiotic engagement we need. But I must say that for these partnerships to be effective, they must be grounded in transparency, mutual benefit, and the same shared commitment to societal well-being and not just capitalist gains. How do advances in technology—such as AI, biotechnology, or quantum computing—contribute to both the emergence and mitigation of frontier risks? So, as we all know, technological advancements are double-edged swords. New technologies can introduce unforeseen challenges, such as the many bias dilemmas we are seeing with AI systems, biosecurity concerns in biotechnology, and security vulnerabilities in quantum computing. Quantum computing alone, poses significant security vulnerabilities, notably its potential to break current public-key cryptographic systems, rendering them ineffective. So, beyond the excitement of quantum, there’s a lot to caution there. I don’t think we have developed quantum-resistant cryptographic algorithms to safeguard our digital communications infrastructure. Anyways on the other hand, these technologies offer tools to address existing problems. AI can enhance disaster response, biotechnology can lead to medical breakthroughs, and quantum computing can solve complex challenges that have never ever been solved before, so I guess the key lies in steering technological development towards inclusive and ethical applications, ensuring that innovations serve to mitigate rather than exacerbate risks. What lessons have been learned from recent global crises, such as the COVID-19 pandemic or geopolitical conflicts, that inform how we prepare for future frontier risks, using Africa as a case study? The COVID-19 pandemic has illuminated several lessons for Africa. The first is the importance of local solutions. Reliance on global supply chains proved precarious; local production and self-reliance are crucial! The other lesson is how the shift to digital platforms like Zoom highlighted the need for robust internet access and technological literacy. We saw that public measures were more effective when communities were actively involved and informed. As our people say, “Wisdom is like a baobab tree; no one individual can embrace it.” Collective effort and shared knowledge are essential in preparing for future risks. How do you see the role of the Global Future Council on Frontier Risk evolving in the coming years? The Global Future Council on Frontier Risk will increasingly serve as a nexus for interdisciplinary collaboration, foresight, and policy innovation. Its role will involve identifying emerging risks, advising policymakers and perhaps fostering global dialogue in a truly impactful way. What innovations or strategies are you most excited about for addressing the challenges of frontier risk? I’m particularly enthusiastic about the future development of more “Explainable AI,” that is, AI systems and tools which aim to make AI decision-making processes transparent and understandable. This innovation is crucial for building trust and ensuring that AI systems are accountable, especially in diverse cultural contexts like in Nigeria and across Africa. Also, I look forward to the establishment of inclusive data governance frameworks that prioritize the participation of marginalized communities in decision-making processes. Such frameworks are what can ensure that technological advancements are equitable and culturally sensitive. What is one frontier risk that you think is currently being underestimated, and why should the world and Africa pay closer attention to it? The proliferation of deepfake technology is a frontier risk that is currently underestimated. Deepfakes have the potential to disrupt every single society on this planet, especially by how they could be used to deceive and spread misinformation, undermine trust in media, and destabilise political processes. In Africa, where digital literacy varies, the impact could be particularly severe, leading to social unrest and eroding democratic institutions as we have seen in countries like Gabon, Kenya, Nigeria and South Africa. Proactive measures, including public awareness campaigns and the development of detection technologies, are essential to mitigate this risk. If you could implement one change globally to better prepare for frontier risks, what would it be and why? I would advocate for the establishment of a global frontier risk observatory, an international body dedicated to monitoring, researching, and providing guidance on emerging frontier risks. This observatory would facilitate the sharing of knowledge, resources, and best practices, ensuring a coordinated and informed global response. By pooling expertise and fostering collaboration, we can enhance our collective resilience against the uncertainties of the future. What motivates you personally to focus on frontier risks, and what do you find most rewarding about this work? My motivation stems from a deep commitment to social justice and the desire to ensure that technological advancements benefit all of humanity, particularly marginalised communities. The most rewarding aspect of this work is witnessing the empowerment of individuals and communities as they harness technology to improve their lives. It’s fulfilling to contribute to the development of policies and frameworks that promote equity, inclusivity, and resilience in the face of emerging challenges. It’s also rewarding that I get the chance to teach students, lawyers and even judges about these issues and see them apply the learning in their work. Can you tell us about your journey into the field of human rights? What inspired you to pursue this path? My journey into human rights advocacy began during my university years at the University of Abuja, where I was actively involved in student organisations focused on human rights and social justice. Hosting radio programs like “Flava” and “Talk Your Own: Make Naija Better” for more than 12 years further exposed me to the challenges faced by marginalized communities across Nigeria. These experiences ignited a passion to use my legal expertise to advocate for the rights of the underserved, particularly in the context of technological advancements. What specific areas of human rights do you specialise in, and why did you choose them? How do you stay motivated when facing challenges or setbacks in your work? I specialise in the intersection of artificial intelligence and human rights, focusing on how AI can serve the needs of marginalized populations, especially in Africa and the Global South. This specialisation was driven by the recognition that technological advancements, while holding great promise, also pose significant risks to human rights if not properly governed. Facing challenges is inherent in this field, but I draw motivation from the resilience of the communities I serve and the belief that equitable technological progress is achievable. What role do you think non-governmental organisations (NGOs) play in advancing human rights, and how do you collaborate with them? What strategies have you found most effective for raising awareness or mobilizing action on human rights issues? NGOs are pivotal in advancing human rights; they act as watchdogs, advocates, and service providers. Collaborating with NGOs allows for grassroots engagement and the amplification of marginalised voices. Effective strategies for raising awareness include leveraging media platforms, as I did with my radio programs, and utilising digital tools to disseminate information widely. Mobilising action often requires community involvement, education, and the creation of platforms for dialogue and advocacy. How do you assess the effectiveness of international tribunals or courts in prosecuting human rights violations? International tribunals still play a crucial role in holding perpetrators accountable and setting legal precedents. Today we may see examples of how their effectiveness can be hindered by geopolitical influences, and other factors like limited enforcement mechanisms and the challenges they face in securing cooperation from states. But we cannot underestimate the value of tribunals and courts, even at the international level. Strengthening these institutions is what we need right now. And this requires enhancing their independence, ensuring adequate resources, and fostering international collaboration to support their mandates. Can you explain the role of governments in protecting human rights and where they often fall short? Governments are the primary duty-bearers in upholding human rights and are responsible for creating and enforcing laws that protect citizens. However, shortcomings often arise due to corruption, lack of political will, inadequate resources, or oppressive policies. To fulfill their obligations, governments must commit to transparency, accountability, and inclusive governance that prioritises the well-being of all citizens. One of the reasons we have governments in the first place is because we need them to fulfil this role of human rights protection! What changes would you recommend to current international human rights laws or frameworks? I recommend incorporating provisions that address the challenges posed by emerging technologies, such as AI and biotechnology, to human rights. Additionally, there should be a greater emphasis on inclusive data governance policies that consider the unique contexts of the Global South. This approach ensures that technological advancements do not exacerbate existing inequalities but instead promote equitable development. How do you ensure the voices of affected communities are amplified in human rights advocacy? To amplify the voices of affected communities, it’s essential to engage in participatory advocacy, where community members are active contributors rather than passive recipients. Until the lion learns to speak, the tale of the hunt will always glorify the hunter. Capacity-building initiatives are a priority, and then we facilitate platforms for storytelling and ensure representation in decision-making processes. There are many ways. But by empowering communities to tell their own stories, we promote authentic advocacy that reflects their lived experiences. What role does technology play in advancing or hindering human rights efforts? How do you approach situations where governments deny or refute evidence of human rights abuses? Like I said earlier, technology serves as a double-edged sword, even in human rights efforts. On the one hand, it enables documentation, dissemination, and mobilisation, as seen in the use of mobile technology for human rights advocacy in Nigeria. On the other hand, it can be used for surveillance and censorship. So, in situations where governments deny evidence of abuses, it’s crucial to employ rigorous documentation methods, collaborate with international bodies, and leverage technology to gather and preserve irrefutable evidence, like we already do at the Center for Human Rights Science, where I am a fellow. What is your vision for the future of global human rights, and what steps do you believe are essential to achieve it? My vision for global human rights is a world where technological advancements are harnessed to promote equity, justice, and the well-being of every single individual irrespective of class, race, ethnicity, status, orientation, tech-enablement or gender, name it. This is why I speak about the need to develop inclusive policies that consider the unique contexts of the Global South, ensuring that AI and other technologies do not exacerbate existing inequalities. This is also why I speak about “Responsible AI,” not just “safe” or “productive,” but designed to respect human rights. But AI is a deterritorial technology; not one country can master the governance of it all hence, why we need to keep encouraging international cooperation, even when it is difficult, to address transnational challenges and share best practices. Nigerians and Africans have a relevant voice in the development and implementation of technologies that impact their lives, and we must work towards a future where the fundamental human rights of everyone are upheld even in the face of rapid technological change.
LAUSANNE , Switzerland , Dec. 2, 2024 /PRNewswire/ -- ADC Therapeutics SA (NYSE: ADCT), a commercial-stage global leader and pioneer in the field of antibody drug conjugates (ADCs), today announced that the Company has made grants of options to purchase an aggregate of 34,900 of the Company's common shares to three new employees on December 2, 2024 (each, a "Grant"). The Grants were offered as material inducement to the employees' employment. The grants were approved by the Compensation Committee of the Company's Board of Directors pursuant to the Company's Inducement Plan to motivate and reward the recipients to perform at the highest levels and contribute significantly to the success of the Company. The Grants were made in reliance on the employment inducement exemption under the NYSE's Listed Company Manual Rule 303A.08. The Company is issuing this press release pursuant to Rule 303A.08. The Grants shall vest and become exercisable 25% on the first anniversary of the grant date, and 1/48th of the aggregate number of shares subject to the award on each monthly anniversary of the grant date thereafter, such that the entire award will be vested as of the fourth anniversary of the grant date, subject to continued employment with the Company. About ADC Therapeutics ADC Therapeutics (NYSE: ADCT) is a commercial-stage global leader and pioneer in the field of antibody drug conjugates (ADCs). The Company is advancing its proprietary ADC technology to transform the treatment paradigm for patients with hematologic malignancies and solid tumors. ADC Therapeutics' CD19-directed ADC ZYNLONTA (loncastuximab tesirine-lpyl) received accelerated approval by the FDA and conditional approval from the European Commission for the treatment of relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma after two or more lines of systemic therapy. ZYNLONTA is also in development in combination with other agents and in earlier lines of therapy. In addition to ZYNLONTA, ADC Therapeutics has multiple ADCs in ongoing clinical and preclinical development. ADC Therapeutics is based in Lausanne (Biopôle), Switzerland , and has operations in London and New Jersey . For more information, please visit https://adctherapeutics.com/ and follow the Company on LinkedIn . ZYNLONTA ® is a registered trademark of ADC Therapeutics SA. Forward-Looking Statements This press release contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. In some cases you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as "may", "will", "should", "would", "expect", "intend", "plan", "anticipate", "believe", "estimate", "predict", "potential", "seem", "seek", "future", "continue", or "appear" or the negative of these terms or similar expressions, although not all forward-looking statements contain these identifying words. Forward-looking statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that can cause actual results to differ materially from those described. Factors that may cause such differences include, but are not limited to: the expected cash runway into mid-2026 the Company's ability to grow ZYNLONTA ® revenue in the United States ; the ability of our partners to commercialize ZYNLONTA ® in foreign markets, the timing and amount of future revenue and payments to us from such partnerships and their ability to obtain regulatory approval for ZYNLONTA ® in foreign jurisdictions; the timing and results of the Company's or its partners' research and development projects or clinical trials including LOTIS 5 and 7, ADCT 602 as well as early research in certain solid tumors with different targets, linkers and payloads; the timing and results of investigator-initiated trials including those studying FL and MZL and the potential regulatory and/or compendia strategy and the future opportunity; the timing and outcome of regulatory submissions for the Company's products or product candidates; actions by the FDA or foreign regulatory authorities; projected revenue and expenses; the Company's indebtedness, including Healthcare Royalty Management and Blue Owl and Oaktree facilities, and the restrictions imposed on the Company's activities by such indebtedness, the ability to comply with the terms of the various agreements and repay such indebtedness and the significant cash required to service such indebtedness; and the Company's ability to obtain financial and other resources for its research, development, clinical, and commercial activities. Additional information concerning these and other factors that may cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated in the forward-looking statements is contained in the "Risk Factors" section of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K and in the Company's other periodic and current reports and filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. These statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual results, performance, achievements or prospects to be materially different from any future results, performance, achievements or prospects expressed in or implied by such forward-looking statements. The Company cautions investors not to place undue reliance on the forward-looking statements contained in this document. CONTACTS: Investors Marcy Graham ADC Therapeutics Marcy.Graham@adctherapeutics.com +1 650-667-6450 Media Nicole Riley ADC Therapeutics Nicole.Riley@adctherapeutics.com +1 862-926-9040 View original content to download multimedia: https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/adc-therapeutics-makes-grants-to-new-employees-under-inducement-plan-302320100.html SOURCE ADC Therapeutics SA
AP Sports SummaryBrief at 6:40 p.m. ESTASX have been a mixed bag in 2025, with some names outperforming the market by a wide margin while others have floundered. The (ASX: XHJ), which tracks the sector's market performance, has climbed 7.75% this year to date. This is behind the broader market represented by the ASX: XJO), which is up nearly 11% over the same time. But experts reckon ASX healthcare shares are poised to take centre stage in 2025. Could this signal value waiting to be unlocked? Let's see. Outlook for ASX healthcare shares Analysts and investment firms are bullish on the Australian healthcare 's long-term fundamentals. This could be positive for ASX healthcare shares. Earlier this year, Wilsons Advisory described the sector's outlook as , citing a combination of robust earnings growth and relatively low valuations. Healthcare expenditure is also projected to surge over the coming years. The Federal Budget projected by FY25, increasing to $123 billion the following year. Meanwhile, Fidelity International highlights the ageing population for healthcare companies. It says the number of people aged over 65 is expected to double by 2050. Healthcare has another notable structural driver: the global population aged over 65 will double by 2050 and the proportion of incomes we spend on keeping ourselves healthy will continue to grow. Aussie investors are also jumping on board the healthcare gravy train. According to investment firm VanEck's latest investor survey, ASX healthcare shares are in Australians plan to target in 2025 (alongside technology). The survey found that 77% of respondents were eyeing international equity , with healthcare topping the list of sectors due to its defensive nature and growth potential. Where are the opportunities? According to VanEck, global and ASX healthcare shares have " for investors. The company says there are four primary ways to gain exposure to the space, namely businesses in the pharmaceutical, , equipment and supply, and healthcare services domains. VanEck also says is key. Investors can gain exposure to healthcare companies by buying shares in healthcare companies directly or via a fund or . Meanwhile. analysts are bullish on two giants among fellow ASX healthcare shares. Bell Potter rates ( ) a buy forecasting "above market" profit growth for the biotech giant. ECP Asset Management also has long-term projections on CSL, being of by 2027. ( ) is also rated highly by brokers. A total of 15 from 18 brokers covering the stock rate it a buy, according to CommSec. Ord Minnett , with a $40.05 per share price target. It projects profit growth of 13% from the respiratory device business in 2025. Final thoughts According to experts, ASX healthcare shares are well-positioned for 2025. Part of this is due to the outlook on the broader healthcare industry. Meanwhile, analysts see plenty of earnings potential from companies within the sector. Stepping back, healthcare is known as a 'defensive' industry because it is not strongly correlated to the ups and downs of the broader economy. In other words, healthcare is considered necessary in both good and bad economic times.