21 casino live chat
At a Wednesday news conference where he joined other local leaders to discuss Preakness 2025, Maryland Gov. Wes Moore spoke briefly about the case of Luigi Mangione, the Maryland man who has been charged in the shooting death of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson. “I was 3 years old when my dad died in front of me because he didn’t get the health care he needed. And so the brokenness of the healthcare system is something I’ve lived with. It still very much sits with me to this day. Working to fix it is something I still make a core part of my why and my ethos,” said Moore, whose father died from a rare, but treatable virus. “I also know that the way we solve things is not by killing people in cold blood. The way we solve things is not killing people because we don’t like the industry they’re in or the company they represent. And I’m glad that the wheels of justice are now moving. “We need to have justice for what happened to Brian Thompson. I would just ask people to remember that because of the actions of this person, there are two teenagers right now in Minnesota who are growing up like I did. Fatherless. And we can never forget that.” Have a news tip? Contact Childs Walker at daviwalker@baltsun.com, 410-332-6893 and x.com/ChildsWalker.Online debate over foreign workers in tech shows tensions in Trump's political coalition
Trump asks Supreme Court to delay TikTok ban so he can weigh in after he takes office
ORCHARD PARK, N.Y. (AP) — In a season that began with many questions and lowered expectations , it was apt watching Bills quarterback Josh Allen join coach Sean McDermott lay on the cold, wet sideline to make snow angels in celebrating Buffalo’s earliest clinching of a division title in team history. That Allen took part was no surprise. The newly engaged 28-year-old has maintained the happy-go-lucky approach he brought with him to Buffalo as a raw-talented athlete in 2018, while gradually blossoming into one of the NFL’s elite quarterbacks. For McDermott, it was a pleasant surprise to see the usually reserved eight-year coach finally let his hair down — figuratively, because the few jokes he does make are usually about being bald. With his latest do-it-all three-TD outing — one rushing, one receiving and, the coup de grace, being credited with receiving his own pass for a score off a lateral from Amari Cooper — in a 35-10 win over San Francisco on Sunday night , Allen continued making his strongest NFL MVP case. What’s also becoming apparent is how much McDermott deserves consideration for coach of the year honors. Without the two, the Bills (10-2) wouldn’t be in this position in becoming just the eighth NFL team — and first since Indianapolis in 2009 — to clinch a division title with at least five games remaining in their schedule. It’s reflective of how the two have grown together in what, on the outside, could be perceived as an odd couple relationship between an offensive-minded, swashbuckling quarterback and a defensive-minded coach, too often knocked for being too conservative. Perhaps, it’s Allen’s boyish nature that has brought out the risk-taker in McDermott, who has carried over the aggressive approach he takes to defense by placing trust in his quarterback. It’s become apparent in everything the Bills have accomplished so far in having at least 10 wins through 12 games for just the fifth time in team history, and first since 1991, when Buffalo was led by eventual Hall of Famers in coach Marv Levy and quarterback Jim Kelly. Buffalo has won seven straight since consecutive losses to Baltimore and Houston. And the Bills have scored 30 or more points in six straight outings, matching the team record set in 2004. Allen is doing more with less on an offense that was supposed to be hampered following the offseason departures of receivers Stefon Diggs and Gabe Davis and center Mitch Morse. The Bills are more balanced in leaning on their running attack, while Allen has also curtailed his turnover-prone ways. He's lost two fumbles and thrown just five interceptions after being picked off a career-worst 18 times last season. Meantime, McDermott has taken a different approach to fourth down situations. The Bills have converted 13 of 15 fourth down attempts after going 9 of 16 last season and 7 of 13 in 2022. The most fourth down attempts during McDermott’s tenure came in 2021, when Buffalo converted just 11 of 22. This is but an example of the bond the quarterback and coach have built in a shared objective of overcoming past playoff failures. Clinching a division title is but one step, with the Bills now focused on catching the Kansas City Chiefs (11-1), whom they’ve beaten already , for the AFC’s top seed. In calling it the team’s next goal, McDermott went off script from his usual game-at-a-time message by noting the importance of celebrating a division-clinching win, if only for one day. “Being 50 years old and 20-plus years in this league, I’ve learned to try and enjoy the moments,” McDermott said. “And this is a moment, right?” It certainly was. Turnover differential. Buffalo’s defense forced three fumbles, including one at its goal line, while the offense didn’t commit a giveaway. The Bills upped their league-leading turnover differential entering Monday to plus-17. Run defense. Though the conditions were snowy and slick, the Bills allowed 119 yards rushing in the first half before the 49ers were forced to start passing the ball once the score became lopsided. Buffalo particularly struggled in stopping Christian McCaffrey, who had 53 yards on seven carries before leaving the game with a potential season-ending knee injury . LB Matt Milano was in on five tackles while playing 37 of 48 defensive snaps in his first outing in nearly 14 months after being sidelined by a broken right leg and torn left biceps. CB Kaiir Elam, the 2022 first-round pick was a healthy inactive for a second straight outing, and still having difficulty finding a regular role. None reported. 9-0 — The Bills' home record going back to last season, marking their second-longest run in team history. Hit the road for two outings, starting with a trip to face the Los Angeles Rams on Sunday. AP NFL: https://apnews.com/hub/nflMEN'S COLLEGE BASKETBALL 11 a.m., Md.-Eastern Shore at Maryland;BTN 11 a.m., E. Kentucky at Louisville;CW 11 a.m., Coppin St. at Georgetown;FS1 1 p.m., Alabama A&M at Georgia Tech;ACCN 1 p.m., NC Central at NC ACBS 1 p.m., Bucknell at SyracuseCW 1 p.m., Mississippi at Memphis;ESPN2 1 p.m., Loyola (Md.) at DePaul;FS1 3 p.m., Fairleigh Dickinson at Boston College;ACCN 3 p.m., Howard at Hampton;CBS 3 p.m., UCLA vs. Gonzaga, Los Angeles;FOX 3 p.m., Abilene Christian at Texas ASECN 5 p.m., Utah St. at San Diego St.;FOX 5 p.m., Delaware at St. John’s;FS1 WOMEN'S COLLEGE BASKETBALL 12:30 p.m., Creighton at St. John’s;FOX 1 p.m., Wisconsin at Indiana;BTN 3 p.m., Penn St. at Minnesota;BTN 3 p.m., Oregon St. at Gonzaga;ESPN2 COLLEGE FOOTBALL 10 a.m., The Wasabi Fenway Bowl: UConn vs. North Carolina, Boston;ESPN 11 a.m., The Bad Boy Mowers Pinstripe Bowl: Boston College vs. Nebraska, New York;ABC 1:15 p.m., The Isleta New Mexico Bowl: Louisiana-Lafayette vs. TCU, Albuquerque, N.M.;ESPN 2:30 p.m., The Pop-Tarts Bowl: Iowa St. vs. Miami, Orlando, Fla.;ABC 3:15 p.m., The Snoop Dogg Arizona Bowl: Miami (Ohio) vs. Colorado St., Tucson, Ariz.;CW 4:45 p.m., The Go Bowling Military Bowl: East Carolina vs. NC State, Annapolis, Md.;ESPN 6:30 p.m., The Valero Alamo Bowl: BYU vs. Colorado, San Antonio;ABC 8:15 p.m., The Radiance Technologies Independence Bowl: Louisiana Tech vs. Army, Shreveport, La.;ESPN NBA 2 p.m., Miami at Atlanta;NBATV 5 p.m., Oklahoma City at Charlotte;NBATV 7 p.m., Milwaukee at Chicago;CHSN 7:30 p.m., Phoenix at Golden State;NBATV NFL Noon, L.A. Chargers at New England;NFLN 3:30 p.m., Denver at Cincinnati;NFLN 7 p.m., Arizona at L.A. Chargers;NFLN NHL 6 p.m., Washington at Toronto;NHLN SUNDAY MEN'S COLLEGE BASKETBALL 11 a.m., Indiana St. at Ohio St.;BTN Noon, Penn at Penn St.;PEACOCK 12:30 p.m., Northeastern at Northwestern;PEACOCK 1 p.m., Chicago St. at Illinois;BTN 1 p.m., Morgan St. at Minnesota;PEACOCK 2 p.m., Buffalo at Temple;ESPNU 2 p.m., NJIT at Washington;PEACOCK 3 p.m., Winthrop at Indiana;BTN 5 p.m., Toledo at Purdue;BTN 7 p.m., Campbell at North Carolina;ACCN 7 p.m., W. Kentucky at Michigan;BTN WOMEN'S COLLEGE BASKETBALL Noon, South Florida at Rice;ESPN2 1 p.m., Wofford at South Carolina;SECN 9 p.m., Michigan at Southern Cal;BTN NFL Noon, N.Y. Jets at Buffalo;CBS Noon, Dallas at Philadelphia;FOX 3:25 p.m., Green Bay at Minnesota;FOX 7:20 p.m., Atlanta at Washington;NBC, PEACOCK NHL 2 p.m., Buffalo at St. Louis;FDSMW 7:30 p.m., Dallas at Chicago;ESPN MEN'S SOCCER 9 a.m., Premier League: Nottingham Forest at Everton;USA 11:15 a.m., Premier League: Liverpool at West Ham United;USA MONDAY MEN'S COLLEGE BASKETBALL 2 p.m., W. Michigan at Michigan St.;BTN 4 p.m., Columbia at Rutgers;BTN 6 p.m., New Hampshire at Iowa;BTN 6 p.m., Cincinnati at Kansas St.;CBSSN 7 p.m., Oakland at Arkansas;ESPN2 8 p.m., Southern U. at Nebraska;BTN 8 p.m., Iowa St. at Colorado;CBSSN COLLEGE FOOTBALL 1:30 p.m., The TransPerfect Music City Bowl: Iowa vs. Missouri, Nashville, Tenn.;ESPN NBA 6 p.m., Chicago at Charlotte;CHSN 6 p.m., New York at Washington;NBATV 9 p.m., Dallas at Sacramento;NBATV NHL 6 p.m., N.Y. Rangers at Florida;NHLN MEN'S SOCCER 2 p.m., Premier League: Newcastle United at Manchester United;USA
Trump asks US Supreme Court to pause law threatening TikTok ban
Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 8 Elite is an exciting new mobile platform that’s destined to power many of next year’s flagship smartphones. The improvements Qualcomm has made in this year’s chip are highlighted by the fact that the chipmaker has dropped its traditional “Gen” designations to give the fourth-generation chip an identity all its own . While the Snapdragon 8 Elite has already started showing up in some more niche flagships like the Realme GT 7 Pro , we likely won’t really get a taste of what it can do until more mainstream players like OnePlus and Samsung bring it to their phones. The OnePlus 13 has already been announced and will probably hit North American shores early next year. There’s also little doubt that the new chip will also be at the core of Samsung’s Galaxy S25 lineup , likely powering new Galaxy AI features and bringing the S25 Ultra’s cameras to new heights . On the other side of the ring, Apple continues to flex its chipmaking muscles with the A18 Pro , which is at the heart of this year’s iPhone 16 Pro . We don’t have to wait to see what that chip is capable of, however, as Apple has already ( mostly ) put its best foot forward with Apple Intelligence and new computational photography features. While it’s hard to compare the Snapdragon 8 Elite and A18 Pro on equal footing since both are used in fundamentally different mobile platforms, their differences raise some interesting questions. Most notably, does either piece of silicon give one platform a significant advantage over the other, or is it more about what phone makers do with the capabilities that are available to them? Let’s dig in and find out. Snapdragon 8 Elite vs. Apple A18 Pro: specs Snapdragon 8 Elite vs. Apple A18 Pro: CPU Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 8 Elite marks a significant jump over its predecessor when compared to Apple’s A18 Pro, as it’s the company’s first chip to move to TSMC’s 3-nanometer (3nm) fabrication process. Apple was the first to make the 3nm transition with its 2023 A17 Pro used in the iPhone 15 Pro lineup. However, it used an earlier version of TSMC’s process, dubbed N3B, which was beset by manufacturing problems that resulted in lower yields. It may also be the reason for the binned A17 Pro chips that have found their way into this year’s iPad mini 7 — there’s a good chance these are leftover chips from the N3B process that didn’t make the cut for the iPhone 15 Pro. N3B wasn’t ready for prime time, which is likely why Qualcomm skipped that early 3nm process until it evolved into this year’s N3E. That’s not to say that the N3B process made the A17 Pro inferior in any way. The problems with it were related to production, but those chips that did come off the line successfully were still powerful enough to usher in a new era of mobile gaming and prepare Apple’s iPhone 15 Pro models for the new AI capabilities that would become the foundation of Apple Intelligence. Now that N3E is ready, the Snapdragon 8 Elite and Apple’s A18 Pro have adopted that more stable process. This puts them on the same core technology baseline, but that’s where their similarities end, as Apple and Qualcomm have each taken their silicon in different directions. Unlike Apple, Qualcomm builds chips for third-party platforms, ranging from smartphones and tablets to ARM-based Windows PCs. It’s this last category that’s inspired the Snapdragon 8 Elite, which brings its new Oryon core technology that debuted in the Snapdragon X processors in last year’s AI PCs to the mobile space. However, this is a second generation of that core that boasts better performance and power efficiency than the ones found in its X chips and promise a 45% increase in performance. The two prime cores offer clock speeds of up to 4.32GHz versus 3.4GHz in last year’s chip. Six performance cores supplement that with 3.53GHz peak speeds, placing them ahead of even last year’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 Cortex-X4 prime core. Apple’s A18 Pro takes a different approach, using a combination of performance and efficiency cores similar to Qualcomm’s previous silicon. A pair of high-performance cores deliver clock speeds of up to 4.04GHz, while the four efficiency cores only clock in at 2.2GHz. While you might expect those differences would make the Snapdragon 8 Elite the better performer with eight cores and faster clock speeds across the board, benchmarks surprisingly place both chips roughly on par. The A18 Pro edges out the Snapdragon 8 Elite in single-core performance, while Qualcomm’s chip offers slightly better multicore performance, but they’re very close in both areas, proving that clock speeds and the number of cores don’t tell the whole story. Both chips are extremely powerful in their own right, and there’s no clear winner in raw CPU performance. Snapdragon 8 Elite vs. Apple A18 Pro: GPU In 2023, Apple announced it had developed “a breakthrough new GPU” for its A17 Pro, and touted it as the biggest redesign in its history. Features like an Apple-designed shader architecture, hardware-accelerated ray tracing, and Metal effect upscaling that works in conjunction with Apple’s Neural Engine (NPU) made the iPhone 15 Pro the first smartphone capable of handling full-quality AAA console games . The A18 Pro uses the same Apple-designed GPU, boosting overall performance by 20% and doubling the ray tracing performance. However, it’s also fair to say that Apple’s move into AAA gaming was more of an indictment of the state of the Android gaming landscape than it was of Qualcomm’s Snapdragon chips. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 3’s Adreno GPU was still a match for the A17 Pro in raw specs, and the Snapdragon 8 Elite has taken that to a new level. Qualcomm says it’s the “first-ever Adreno GPU with sliced architecture,” and it delivers a 40% performance gain over the Gen 3 while adding support for Unreal Engine 5.3 Nanite. The practical upshot of these improvements is a more realistic gaming experience with “film-quality 3D environments for total immersion” and support for the Unreal Chaos Physics Engine, which provides a whole new and more immersive level of realism for gaming. It’s a significant push ahead for Qualcomm silicon. Apple’s advantage in this area has come from its ability to woo game developers and convince them to embrace its MetalFX engine . Last year’s A17 Pro delivered impressive results, and those are continuing with the A18 Pro, turning Apple’s iPhones into gaming powerhouses. Qualcomm hopes that if they build it, game developers will come, and it’s telling that the extremely gaming-focused ROG Phone 9 Pro is one of the first phones to pack in the Snapdragon 8 Elite. Snapdragon 8 Elite vs. Apple A18 Pro: NPU With generative AI becoming a much bigger deal, there’s a third important aspect of modern silicon: the Neural Processing Unit (NPU). Apple calls this its Neural Engine, and it’s been packing these into its A-series chips since the A11 Bionic in 2017. Qualcomm wasn’t far behind. While it didn’t make as much noise about NPUs in those days, the 2018 Snapdragon 845 introduced its first Hexagon Tensor Accelerator. In those days, NPUs were used primarily for under-the-hood features like computational photography. The Hexagon chip was originally a digital signal processor (DSP) that evolved into an NPU, and Apple’s early Neural Engine was primarily used to support then-nascent features like Face ID and Animoji on that year’s iPhone X . We’ve come a long way since then. The Hexagon has evolved into a full-featured NPU with 14 cores in the Snapdragon 8 Elite, and Apple’s Neural Engine has grown from its humble dual-core beginnings to a 16-core subsystem that can handle up to 35 trillion operations per second (TOPS). Both are key to powering their respective platforms’ AI and other machine-learning features, including Galaxy AI on Samsung’s smartphones, Gemini Nano , and Apple Intelligence . Apple is heavily pushing on-device generative AI as a privacy feature, so it’s built its Neural Engine in the A18 Pro and other recent A-series and M-series chips with that in mind. Qualcomm has been a bit slower in getting there; the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 took the first steps into this arena, but the Snapdragon 8 Elite may have the first NPU that can effectively deliver on this thanks to an enhanced token limit that will support more complex and longer inputs without the need to send those requests to cloud servers. NPUs also go deeper than merely consumer-facing AI features. They also drive things like camera enhancements, better power efficiency, and wireless communications. These things are much harder to quantify, but suffice it to say that the Snapdragon 8 Elite and A18 Pro should both be more than up to those tasks. Snapdragon 8 Elite vs. Apple A18 Pro: power efficiency Despite all these performance gains, it’s impressive that both chips promise increased power efficiency. Qualcomm gains more over its predecessor, thanks to the shift to a 3nm process. Still, its second-generation Oryon CPU cores and the sliced architecture of its Adreno 830 GPU result in energy efficiency that matches the performance improvements — 40% faster gaming performance and 40% greater efficiency. Qualcomm says this should translate to an extra 2.5 hours of gaming over its predecessor, all other things being equal. However, the reality of this is somewhat more complex, as things are seldom equal. The smartphones that the Snapdragon 8 Elite go into will have many other things drawing power, notably large high-refresh screens. The chip may be more efficient, but handset makers will have to work on using other components that don’t detract from that. Apple gets a theoretical advantage here as it owns all the pieces, allowing us to see more measurable real-world results. The A18 Pro is only used in two smartphones, the iPhone 16 Pro and iPhone 16 Pro Max, both of which show noticeable, but modest improvements over their A17 Pro-equipped predecessors. Apple typically considers all-day battery life good enough, so the efficiency gains from its new chips are often poured into delivering more power to other aspects of the iPhone, such as the larger displays on this year’s models and the new Apple Intelligence features in iOS 18. Some Android manufacturers may choose to do the same with Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 8 Elite, but the variety of platforms that will incorporate the new chip should result in at least some devices focusing more heavily on improving overall battery life. Snapdragon 8 Elite vs. Apple A18 Pro: other features Once we get past the core components, the two platforms diverge significantly. Qualcomm bakes much more into its silicon, while Apple still relies on third-party chips (some of which are Qualcomm’s, ironically) to handle things like Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, and 5G connectivity. The Snapdragon 8 Elite incorporates Qualcomm’s FastConnect 7900 platform, which includes Wi-Fi 7 support with peak speeds of 5.8Gbps, the X80 5G Modem-RF system, Bluetooth 6.0, and integrated Ultra Wideband. Apple mixes this up more, using Qualcomm’s Snapdragon X75 to handle its 5G connectivity and a Broadcom chip for Wi-Fi 7 and Bluetooth 5.3 in the iPhone 16 Pro models. Similarly, Qualcomm promotes the camera capabilities of the image signal processor in its Snapdragon 8 Elite, which promises more NPU-powered computational photography features for things like multiframe noise reduction and enhancing lower-light video capture. The image signal processor can now handle 320-megapixel photos, 1080p slo-mo video at 480 frames per second (fps), zero shutter lag, and AI-powered skin and sky tone adjustments. However, it feels slightly disingenuous to focus too much on camera specs in a chip since these are simply maximum capabilities that may have little bearing on what we end up with in smartphones equipped with Qualcomm’s latest chip. It’s nice to know it’s raised the bar, but don’t expect to see too many phones with 480-fps slo-mo and the ability to capture 320MP photos. Apple doesn’t tout the same for its A18 Pro because it’s simply part of the iPhone 16 Pro experience. Apple’s silicon is undoubtedly responsible for its new Photographic Styles and 4K/120 fps Cinematic Slow Motion, just like previous generations empowered real-time color grading for Dolby Vision video capture. Snapdragon 8 Elite vs. Apple A18 Pro: final words It’s always been difficult to compare Apple’s A-series chips with anything else on the market in any meaningful way. Beyond benchmarks that fail to tell the whole story, Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 8 Elite and Apple’s A18 Pro live in entirely different worlds. You’ll never find a Qualcomm chip running iOS or an A-series chip running Android. Apple uses its chips exclusively in its own devices, running its own operating systems, which means it controls all the pieces. The A18 Pro was designed with only two devices in mind, the iPhone 16 Pro and iPhone 16 Pro Max, and is unlikely to be used anywhere else. Meanwhile, Qualcomm has engineered its Snapdragon 8 Elite to power a broad range of Android smartphones across different disciplines, from gaming-focused phones like Asus’ ROG Phone 9 Pro to more general-purpose premium flagships like Samsung’s Galaxy S25 series (which are undoubtedly slated to use the new chipset). Each of those companies will use the Snapdragon 8 Elite in different ways, and Qualcomm has to design a chip that’s ready to address them all. That makes the Snapdragon 8 Elite a more versatile chip, but that only matters because it needs to be. Apple can get away with a more single-minded approach for its A18 Pro. While this year’s Apple chip only gets modest improvements over its predecessor, that’s because it already leapt ahead last year when it moved to the early N3B 3nm process for the A17 Pro. Qualcomm has to play a bit of catch-up here, but it’s done so admirably with the Snapdragon 8 Elite, and there’s no doubt it’s ready to power new Android headsets that will take on this year’s Apple flagships. Now, it’s up to Android manufacturers to take that ball and run with it.
1 Wall Street Analyst Thinks Taiwan Semiconductor Stock Is Going to $240. Is It a Buy?Donald Trump will ring the New York Stock Exchange bell as he's named Time's Person of the YearNEW YORK (AP) — Donald Trump used his image as a successful New York businessman to become a celebrity, a reality television star and eventually the president. Now he will get to revel in one of the most visible symbols of success in the city when he rings the opening bell of the New York Stock Exchange on Thursday as he's also named Time Magazine's Person of the Year. Trump is expected to be on Wall Street to mark the ceremonial start of the day's trading, according to four people with knowledge of his plans. He will also be announced Thursday as Time's 2024 Person of the Year , according to a person familiar with the selection. The people who confirmed the stock exchange appearance and Time award were not authorized to discuss the matter publicly and spoke to The Associated Press on condition of anonymity. Javascript is required for you to be able to read premium content. Please enable it in your browser settings. Get any of our free email newsletters — news headlines, obituaries, sports, and more.Facebook Twitter WhatsApp SMS Email Print Copy article link Save OCEAN CITY — The cost of a short stay in the city could go up under an ordinance introduced by City Council creating a 3% fee on stays in hotels, motels or other lodgings booked online. A public hearing must take place before a final vote, planned for 10 a.m. Dec. 5 on the third floor of City Hall, 861 Asbury Ave. The original ordinance was written only for accommodations booked online through third-party services like Vrbo or Airbnb, what the ordinance describes as the “transient space marketplace.” There are currently no local taxes on those rentals, which have become a significant part of the summer rental market. Council President Pete Madden suggested moving the ordinance forward as proposed, and revisiting the potential addition of hotel and motel rooms at a later date. As city attorney Dottie McCrosson described it, there had been discussion of including hotel and motel rooms, but those visitors already pay a 5% state occupancy tax and a 6.625% sales tax, adding 11.625% to the total bill. Jersey Shore restaurants shift gears to survive in offseason Friday’s New Jersey high school football playoff scores Not too late! Voting closes at noon for The Press Football Player of the Week Galloway Township gymnastics center co-owner charged with sexually assaulting minor Offshore wind company to buy vacant 1.5-acre Atlantic City lot for $1 million Atlantic City International Airport's 1 carrier, Spirit Airlines, files for bankruptcy Which players did the Cape-Atlantic League coaches pick as the best of the best in fall sports? Prosecutor still determined to find whoever is responsible for West Atlantic City killings Galloway man gets 3 years in Ocean City fatal crash Upper Township employees disagree on morale These Atlantic City area restaurants are serving Thanksgiving dinner 2 Galloway men arrested after spraying workers with rocks in Nature Preserve $23 million apartment complex promises to bring new vitality to quaint Swedesboro UPDATED NHL referee taken away on stretcher at Flyers game Julian Turney's TD sends St. Augustine past Delbarton in state Non-Public A playoffs As the new ordinance was discussed at the morning meeting, Council member Dave Winslow questioned why it did not include hotels or motels. Those existing taxes do not go to the city, and a move to increase revenue would see a bigger local return if they were included. Council members Keith Hartzell and Sean Barnes took up the call, and Barnes made a motion to amend the ordinance before introduction, which was approved in a 4-3 vote. Council member Terry Crowley recommended against the move, at least without more research. The city hopes to have the new tax in place before Jan. 1. “I would encourage you to really research that,” Crowley said. “There’s a downside there as well. I don’t think we’re considering everything.” A red sticker on a Glenn Cove bulkhead indicates work has come to a halt on boat slips in Ocean City’s smallest lagoon, at least for now. He said the city could approve the ordinance as written and then bring the local room tax up later. “This version is kind of the cleanest way to kickstart the process, to look to bring in additional revenue to the town. It’s been done in many other towns,” Crowley said. “By doing it this way, we're really not incurring any administrative costs. We’re not going to have to hire the anyone else.” At one time, it was difficult and cumbersome to tax third-party rental systems. Now, Vrbo, Airbnb and others are set up to include local fees and taxes, and McCrosson said the state has recently empowered towns to add the additional taxes. Mayor Jay Gillian said the idea has been talked about for some time and was previously raised by former Council member Bob Barr, who is now on the Cape May County Board of Commissioners. McCrosson said she did not intend to single out Airbnb and Vrbo, but those are the two largest online rental marketplaces by a significant margin. As originally proposed, the ordinance would not have applied to rentals through Realtors or directly from the owner, or for hotel stays booked through the hotel’s own website or through the front desk. Some hotel owners have requested some sort of local fee. “There was a perception among hotel (and) motel owners in town that there was not a level playing field,” McCrosson told council. “That Ocean City should somehow tax them or put license fees on them. At that time it was not an easy thing to do.” With the current state law in place and systems created for the third-party rental systems, it is now relatively simple to impose and collect an additional tax on the rentals. Barnes presented the issue as a matter of fairness. Ocean City officials announced Thursday that a 3rd Ward meeting to be led by City Council member Jody Levchuk will be moved from council chambers in City Hall to the larger Chris Maloney Lecture Hall at the Ocean City Free Public Library, 1735 Simpson Ave. Plans for the former Gillian's Wonderland are expected to be part of the discussion. “I don’t want to see anybody pay more taxes than their competitor, but I want to make sure that they’re all paying the same,” he said. He also questioned where the additional fees paid by hotel visitors end up. “It leaves Ocean City,” McCrosson said. “It’s various fees, but it leaves Ocean City.” McCrosson told council the ordinance was their decision, and that a majority of members could amend the ordinance prior to introduction or introduce a new ordinance at a later meeting. “The concern of the administration is, if you’re going to do it, lets get it in place by January,” she said. Barnes, Hartzell, Winslow and Council member Tony Polcini voted to amend the ordinance prior to introduction to include hotel and motel rooms, with votes against from Crowley, Madden and Council member Jody Levchuk. The same 4-3 majority voted to introduce the ordinance, the first step toward a potential final adoption in December. Other communities have imposed local taxes on hotel and motel rooms. In Cape May, the charge is 3%, while in Atlantic City, a $2 surcharge per day in casino rooms, in addition to the 9% Atlantic City luxury tax familiar to any Monopoly player, joins sales and occupancy taxes and other fees. In Ocean City, many hotels also charge additional fees beyond the room rate, such as resort fees covering the use of the pool or other offerings. Ocean City also charges a license fee for rental properties. At the Thursday meeting, McCrosson emphasized the distinction that it was a fee rather than a tax. Contact Bill Barlow: 609-272-7290 bbarlow@pressofac.com Twitter @jerseynews_bill Get Government & Politics updates in your inbox! Stay up-to-date on the latest in local and national government and political topics with our newsletter. Author email {{description}} Email notifications are only sent once a day, and only if there are new matching items.
Jaland Lowe, Pitt charge past LSU in second half to move to 6-0
The Buffalo Bills (9-2) are enjoying the huge win over the Kansas City Chiefs (10-1) during the Week 12 bye week, but one player's week took a bit of a hit thanks to the NFL's decision to fine him. Linebacker A.J. Epenesa was fined $15,400 for a hip-drop tackle during the win over the Chiefs. Per the NFL's Gameday Accountability log, the tackle occurred with 12:51 left in the game, but Epenesa wasn't flagged for the tackle on Chiefs running back Carson Steele. The fifth-year linebacker is currently second on the team with 5.0 sacks and his nine quarterback hits are also second-best. He's 1.5 sacks away from matching his career-best of 6.5 quarterback takedowns, which has been his yearly total for the last two years in a row. He's also just one quarterback hit away from tying his career-best of 10 hits, which was also set over the last two seasons. The NFL is sending a message when it comes to hip-drop tackles, even if the league isn't 100% on the full definition. It's unfortunate that he wasn't flagged during the game, because it certainly seems like the refs and league decision-makers aren't seeing eye-to-eye on the topic. It'll be interesting to see if Epenesa appeals the fine, much like Baltimore Ravens linebacker Roquan Smith did when he was charged for a hip-drop tackle on Tampa Bay Buccaneers wide receiver Chris Godwin. The NFL ultimately decided to rescind Smith's fine, so there's certainly precedent already in place for that to potentially happen to Epenesa. This article first appeared on A to Z Sports and was syndicated with permission.Scammers are targeting teens with these nasty tricksCanada has selected 19 Swiss-made Pilatus PC-21 as a new next-generation training aircraft for the Royal Canadian Air Force (RCAF). The Pilatus PC-21 is designed to be benign and easy to fly for the ab-nitio student and challenging for the pilot soon to be qualified for the front line. It can be used to train pilots from their first day until they transition to fighter jets. Pilatus claims the PC-21 boasts superior aerodynamic performance compared to any other turboprop trainers worldwide. What to know of Canada's Future Aircrew Training program The Pilatus PC-21s are part of the Future Aircrew Training (FAcT) program . The program combines two existing training contracts: training done in-house by the Canadian Air Force, the acquisition of new training aircraft, and more. The FAcT program is replacing training services currently provided by two separate contracts. One is the NATO Flying Training in Canada, which is set to expire in 2027, although it's extendable to 2028 (currently provided by CAE Military Aviation). The second contract is provided by Allied Wings, and that is also set to expire in 2027. Canada's Future Aircrew Training (FAcT) program: Contract awarded: May 2024 Number of aircraft to be purchased: 70 Aircraft types: 19x Pilatus PC-21, 23x Grob G 120TP, others TBA Contract duration: 25 years Contract value: USD $7.8 billion Contractor: SkyAlyne Canada The Canadian Air Force states , " The FAcT program will also include aircrew training for air combat systems officers and airborne electronic sensor operators, which is currently being delivered in-house by the RCAF. The program combines all of these requirements in 1 contract, including maintenance and infrastructure services ." The CAD $11.2 billion (USD $7.8 billion) 25-year contract was awarded to SkyAlyne Canada in May 2024. As part of the contract, SkyAlyne (working with its subcontractor, KF Aerospace) will deliver 70 training aircraft (of which 19 will be Pilatus PC-21 trainers). There is a five-year transition period for SkyAlyne to become the sole pilot and aircrew training program for the Canadian Air Force. Deliveries of the PC-21s are expected to begin in the second half of 2026. The Pilatus PC-21 According to Pilatus , the PC-21 is the only trainer aircraft needed to get pilots flying their fighter jets (although it seems like every plane maker says its aircraft are the best). With the PC-21, pilots start with the simulator and then can perform basic flying, advanced flight, and fighter lead-in training with the PC-21 before transitioning to fighter aircraft. Pitatus states, " On the PC-21, pilots destined to fly fighter aircraft do not need to transition to jets until much later than those flying conventional trainer aircraft, reducing cost and training time. To achieve this, Pilatus significantly expanded the design and performance envelope to take this single-engine turboprop into an area that was, until now, exclusively the domain of jet trainer aircraft ." The PC-21 has Martin-Baker CH-16C Zero-Zero ejection seats, fully balanced and harmonized flight controls, clear visual/system data displays, a full autopilot, and more. The aircraft's powerplant is a Pratt & Whitney Canada PT6-68B turboprop engine providing 1,600 shaft horsepower, and its propeller is a five-bladed graphite scimitar propeller. Key to the PC-21 is its advanced embedded simulation and training suite. According to Pilatus, " Systems integration is at the heart of the PC-21 cockpit philosophy. As an advanced trainer aircraft, the cockpit display and control systems are configured to match the latest generation front-line aircraft as closely as possible. " Pilatus PC-21 performance: Max speed: 370 knots Range: 720 nautical miles Service ceiling: 37,990 feet Rate of climb: 3,999.4 feet/minute g limits: +8.0 –4.0 aerobatic Roll rates: Excess of 200 degrees per second Pilatus claims the PC-21 has speed and climb rates that only jet-powered aircraft can match. The PC-21's wings are rated for up to 8g maneuvers. The company also claims the aircraft offers "significant advantages" over traditional turboprops and jet trainers. "To train the next generation of military pilots, Pilatus developed the next generation trainer: the PC-21, designed and built specifically with student pilots in mind. With air force budgets under continuous pressure, the PC-21 provides a cost-effective and highly efficient training solution." - Pilatus Adding to Pilatus' attractiveness as a trainer aircraft, the PC-21 has been designed to be affordable with a predictable operating cost. Pilatus says, " Experience with existing PC-21 customers has shown that it is possible to reduce the cost of taking a student to wings graduation by more than 50 percent ." The Australian Air Force states , " It eliminates the need for an elementary flying training fleet, but also bridges the performance gap between traditional turboprop trainers and lead-in fighters ." Even so, the PC-21 is far from a one-stop shop, and air forces use it alongside other training aircraft. For example, Canada is also purchasing 23 Grob G 120TP trainers, and Australia operates Hawk 127 lead-in fighters. For more than 80 years, Pilatus has been building planes in Switzerland. A global export success The Pilatus PC-21 is one of the world's most popular and widely used next-generation trainers . So far, 11 (and counting) air forces and training schools have ordered the PC-21. To date, Pilatus has supplied around 250 PC-21s to various air forces around the world - including the Swiss Air Force, the Spanish Air Force, the Australian Air Force, the Saudi Air Force, and others. Saudi Arabia is the largest aircraft operator, followed by Australia. PC-21 operators: Quantity: PC-21 operators: Quantity: Royal Australian Air Force: 49 Royal Canadian Air Force: 19 (planned) French Air and Space Force: 28 Royal Jordanian Air Force: 12 Qatar Emiri Air Force: 24 Royal Saudi Air Force: 55 Republic of Singapore Air Force: 19 Spanish Air and Space Force: 40 Swiss Air Force: 8 United Arab Emirates Air Force: 25 UK's contractor Qinetiq (on behalf of Empire Test Pilot School): 2 The Royal Australian Air Force agrees that the PC-21 is the " world's most advanced pilot training aircraft ." It says the aircraft ensures undergraduate pilots develop the necessary skills needed before progressing to its advanced. The PC-21 competes with other trainers in the export market, including the Indian HAL HTT-40, the United States, Beechcraft T-6 Texan II, the Brazilian Embraer EMB 314 Super Tucano, the South Korean KAI KT-1 Woongbi, and the Turkish TAI Hürkuş trainers. Russia is also developing the Yakovlev Yak-152, which may fill a similar role. Pilatus' other aircraft in production Pilatus currently produces four types of aircraft: the PC-21, P-7, P-12, and the P-24 (a mix of turboprop and jet aircraft). In addition to the PC-21, Pilatus also builds the PC-7 basic trainer. The PC-7 is also used in a light attack role by some air forces (e.g., by the Mexican Air Force). Pilatus also builds two types of civilian aircraft - the Pilatus PC-24 and the Pilatus PC-12 . The PC-24 is a light business jet that first flew in 2015 and came into service in 2018 (around 212 of the jets have been produced). The PC-12 is a single-engined turboprop that has been in production since 1991 (with over 2,000 delivered). It is used for corporate transport, various government agencies (e.g., police departments and air forces), and by small regional airlines. Pilatus is the producer of one of the most iconic piston-engine aircraft. The United States Air Force's new advanced jet trainer The USAF Beechcraft T-6 Texan II The US Air Force's comparable trainer is the Beechcraft T-6 Texan II, a turboprop trainer developed and built by Textron Aviation. In the 2010s, the Texan II replaced the Air Force's aging Cessna T-37B Tweet and the Navy's T-34C Turb Mentor. The T-6 Texan II is developed from the Pilatus PC-9 developed in the 1980s. Textron uses similar language as Pilatus to describe its trainer, " The Beechcraft T-6C Texan II military training aircraft is a next generation military trainer designed for all instruction levels. Purpose-built for a wide range of capabilities, the model T-6C prepares pilots for real world missions ." The Texan has also been ordered by various other air forces (including New Zealand, Morocco, the United Kingdom, Mexico, Israel, Greece, and others. The T-6 Texan II sometimes out-competes the PC-21 for export orders (e.g., within days of Canada saying it had selected the PC-21, Japan announced it had chosen the T-6 Texan II). The USAF Boeing-Saab T-7 Red Hawk Meanwhile, the Boeing-Saab T-7 Red Hawk is in the final development stages and will soon enter serial production. It is a transonic advanced jet trainer developed to replace the aging Northrop T-38 Talon and the Air Force's advanced jet trainer. "Students flying in the T-7A Red Hawk benefit from enhanced situational awareness, improved decision making, realistic preparation, improved safety and increased confidence compared to other training solutions." - Boeing Boeing states , " The T-7A Red Hawk is an all-new Advanced Pilot Training System (APTS) for the U.S. Air Force, with the flexibility to evolve as technologies, missions, and training needs change ." It also says the Red Hawk is specially built to train pilots on fifth-generation aircraft. The United States Air Force plans to purchase 351 Red Hawk trainers and has an option for 450 (far more than the total orders Pilatus has so far received for its PC-21).
NoneThis Is The Average Stock Market Return Over 60 YearsCCSC Technology International Holdings Limited Reports Financial Results for the First Six Months of Fiscal Year 2025 Ended September 30, 2024
Shocking Boxing Day stampede at store after owner invites people to 'steal'Last week, UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson was shot to death on a New York City sidewalk in what was clearly a thoroughly planned-out attack. Over the next few days, as authorities hunted for the killer, online progressives did not try hard to hide their delight that a millionaire health insurance executive like Thompson was killed. Social media was flooded with posts and videos—with different ranges of subtlety—suggesting that Thompson, at the very least, did not deserve to be mourned because of all the health care his company has denied to poor and working people. Progressives framed the shooting as an act of self-defense on behalf of the working class. Before the alleged killer was caught Monday, they promised not to snitch if they saw the shooter themselves and fantasized about a working-class jury nullifying all charges, leading to other CEOs getting gunned down with impunity if they oversaw price increases. The narrative that these online progressives clearly subscribe to and perpetuate is one where, in the United States, healthcare is a totally unfettered, unregulated industry; where—because of a total lack of government involvement—wealthy CEOs charge whatever prices they want and then refuse to provide customers what they already paid for without facing any bad consequences. The characterization of healthcare and health insurance companies charging absurdly high prices while treating their customers terribly without the risk of losing them is spot on. But the idea that what caused this was a lack of government involvement in the healthcare system is completely delusional. And this delusion conveniently removes all the responsibility progressives bear for the nightmare that is the US healthcare system. Today, healthcare is one of the most heavily government-regulated industries in the economy—right up there with the finance and energy sectors. Government agencies are involved in all parts of the process, from the research and production of drugs, the training and licensing of medical professionals, and the building of hospitals to the availability of health insurance, the makeup of insurance plans, and the complicated payment processes. And that is nothing new. The US government has been intervening heavily in the healthcare industry for over a century. And no group has done more to bring this about than the progressives. It really began, after all, during the Progressive Era, when the American Medical Association maneuvered its way into setting the official accreditation standards for the nation’s “unregulated” medical schools. The AMA wrote standards that excluded the medical approaches of their competitors, which forced half of the nation’s medical schools to close. The new shortage of trained doctors drove up the price of medical services—to the delight of the AMA and other government-recognized doctor’s groups—setting the familiar healthcare affordability crisis in motion. Around the same time, progressives successfully pushed for strict restrictions on the production of drugs and, shortly afterward, to grant drug producers monopoly privileges. After WWII, as healthcare grew more expensive, the government used the tax code to warp how Americans paid for healthcare. Under President Truman, the IRS made employer-provided health insurance tax deductible while continuing to tax other means of payment. It didn’t take long for employer plans to become the dominant arrangement and for health insurance to morph away from actual insurance into a general third-party payment system. These government interventions restricting the supply of medical care and privileging insurance over other payment methods created a real affordability problem for many Americans. But the crisis didn’t really start until the 1960s when Congress passed two of the progressive’s favorite government programs—Medicare and Medicaid. Initially, industry groups like the AMA opposed Medicare and Medicaid because they believed the government subsidies would deteriorate the quality of care. They were right about that, but what they clearly didn’t anticipate was how rich the programs would make them. Anyone who’s taken even a single introductory economics class could tell you that prices will rise if supply decreases or demand increases. The government was already keeping the supply of medical services artificially low—leading to artificially high prices. Medicare and Medicaid left those shortages in place and poured a ton of tax dollars into the healthcare sector—significantly increasing demand. The result was an easily predictable explosion in the cost of healthcare. Fewer and fewer people could afford healthcare at these rising prices, meaning more people required government assistance, which meant more demand, causing prices to grow faster and faster. Meanwhile, private health “insurance” providers were also benefiting from the mounting crisis. In a free market, insurance serves as a means to trade risk. Insurance works well for accidents and calamities that are hard to predict individually but relatively easy to predict in bulk, like car accidents, house fires, and unexpected family deaths. Health insurance providers were already being subsidized by all the taxes on competing means of payment, which allowed their plans to grow beyond the typical bounds of insurance and begin to cover easily-predictable occurrences like annual physicals. And, as the price of all of these services continued to shoot up, the costs of these routine procedures were becoming high enough to resemble the costs of emergencies—making consumers even more reliant on insurance. With progressives cheering on, the political class used government intervention to create a healthcare system that behaves as if its sole purpose is to move as much money as possible into the pockets of healthcare providers, drug companies, hospitals, health-related federal agencies, and insurance providers. But the party could not last forever. As the price of healthcare rose, the price of health insurance rose, too. Eventually, when insurance premiums grew too high, fewer employers or individual buyers were willing to buy insurance, and the flow of money into the healthcare system started to falter. The data suggests that that tipping point was reached in the early 2000s. For the first time since the cycle began back in the 1960s, the number of people with health insurance began to fall each year. Healthcare providers—who had seemingly assumed that the flow of money would never stop increasing—began to panic. Then came Barack Obama. Obama’s seminal legislative accomplishment—the Affordable Care Act, or Obamacare—can best be understood as a ploy by healthcare providers and the government to keep the party going. Obamacare required all fifty million uninsured Americans to obtain insurance, and it greatly expanded what these “insurance” companies covered. Demand for healthcare shot back up, and the vicious cycle started back up again—which is why the bill enjoyed so much support from big corporations all across the healthcare industry. Before it was passed, economists were practically screaming that the Affordable Care Act would make care less affordable by raising premiums and healthcare prices while making shortages worse. Progressives dismissed such concerns as Reagan-era “free market fundamentalist” propaganda. But that is exactly what happened . Now, the affordability crisis is worse than ever as prices reach historic levels. And, because Obamacare brought American healthcare much closer to a single-payer system, the demand for healthcare far exceeds the supply of healthcare—leading to deadly shortages. There are literally not enough resources or available medical professionals to treat everyone who can pay for care. Also, the tax code and warped “insurance” market protect these providers from competition—making it almost impossible for people to switch to a different provider after their claims are unfairly denied. If it were simply greed, denying customers who already paid would be a feature in all industries. But it’s not. It requires the kind of policy protections progressives helped implement. And on top of all that, despite paying all this money, Americans are quickly becoming one of the sickest populations on Earth. This is one of the most pressing problems facing the country. A problem that requires immediate, radical change to solve. But it also requires an accurate and precise diagnosis—something that, this week, progressives demonstrated they are incapable of making. Related Articles Commentary | John Stossel: Your tax dollars not at work Commentary | After so many years of failure, time’s up for California Democrats Commentary | Vince Fong: We don’t need Newsom to lecture us. We need him to listen to us. Commentary | Deregulation rather than fossil fuel controls needed to fix California insurance market Commentary | The FBI has been political from the start The American progressive movement is responsible for providing the political class the intellectual cover they needed to break the healthcare market and transform the entire system into a means to transfer wealth to people like Brian Thompson. Now, they want to sit back, pretend like they’ve never gotten their way, that the government has never done anything with the healthcare market, and that these healthcare executives just popped up and started doing this all on their own—all so they can celebrate him being gunned down in the street. It’s disgusting. Brian Thompson acted exactly like every economically literate person over the last fifty years has said health insurance CEOs would act if progressives got their way. If we’re ever going to see the end of this century-long nightmare, we need to start listening to the people who have gotten it right, not those who pretend they are blameless as they fantasize online about others starting a violent revolution. Connor O’Keeffe ( @ConnorMOKeeffe ) produces media and content at the Mises Institute. This commentary is republished with permission from the Mises Institute.House approves $895B defense bill with military pay raise, ban on transgender care for minors