must hit by fortune gems
Flames visit the Senators after shootout winThe Commanders and Cowboys played in. one of the funniest games in the NFL this season, as the two divisional rivals went back and forth with each team being on the wrong end of some massive blunders in what ended up a 34-26 Cowboys win. The final three minutes was particularly insane, as it saw the game go from 20-9 Dallas to 34-26 with a truly outrageous sequence of events. The first was a touchdown from Jayden Daniels to Zach Ertz, with Daniels running in the two-point try to make it 20-17. On the ensuing kickoff, Kavontae Turpin let the ball bounce in front of him and had it roll past him for a near-disaster, before turning it into a touchdown return with a quick spin move and outrageous speed, making it 27-17. The Commanders would then kick a field goal with just under two minutes to play to make it 27-20. A failed onside kick figured to be about the end of things, but it was truly just the beginning. Washington’s defense got the three-and-out needed to give their offense a chance at a miracle, and Daniels delivered for the second time this season as Dallas’ defense melted down, allowing Terry McLaurin to catch the ball and evade everyone on his way for an 87-yard touchdown. However, Austin Seibert had already missed an extra point earlier in the game, so it was anything but a guarantee they would tie the game, and sure enough a bad snap led to a rushed operation and Seibert hooked another left of the uprights to keep it a 1-point game (videos below). On the ensuing onside kick, the Cowboys scooped it up and ran it back for a touchdown, which was the one thing that could keep the Commanders hopes alive, as they would get the ball back with time on the clock and a chance at another Hail Mary. Alas, this time Daniels’ efforts at a miracle ended up being caught by Dallas and the game finally ended with a Cowboys win that became far more difficult than it ever needed to be.
Empowered Funds LLC decreased its position in Brunswick Co. ( NYSE:BC – Free Report ) by 71.3% in the 3rd quarter, according to its most recent filing with the Securities & Exchange Commission. The firm owned 9,809 shares of the company’s stock after selling 24,354 shares during the period. Empowered Funds LLC’s holdings in Brunswick were worth $822,000 at the end of the most recent quarter. Other large investors have also made changes to their positions in the company. Nisa Investment Advisors LLC increased its stake in Brunswick by 0.5% during the 3rd quarter. Nisa Investment Advisors LLC now owns 26,731 shares of the company’s stock worth $2,241,000 after purchasing an additional 145 shares in the last quarter. Inspire Investing LLC boosted its holdings in shares of Brunswick by 2.8% in the third quarter. Inspire Investing LLC now owns 5,545 shares of the company’s stock valued at $465,000 after buying an additional 153 shares during the period. Wealth Enhancement Advisory Services LLC increased its position in shares of Brunswick by 3.9% during the third quarter. Wealth Enhancement Advisory Services LLC now owns 4,647 shares of the company’s stock worth $390,000 after acquiring an additional 174 shares in the last quarter. Comerica Bank raised its holdings in shares of Brunswick by 0.6% during the first quarter. Comerica Bank now owns 35,548 shares of the company’s stock worth $3,431,000 after acquiring an additional 205 shares during the period. Finally, CWM LLC lifted its position in Brunswick by 21.6% in the 3rd quarter. CWM LLC now owns 1,323 shares of the company’s stock valued at $111,000 after acquiring an additional 235 shares in the last quarter. Institutional investors own 99.34% of the company’s stock. Wall Street Analyst Weigh In A number of equities analysts have issued reports on BC shares. Northcoast Research upgraded Brunswick from a “neutral” rating to a “buy” rating and set a $100.00 target price for the company in a report on Monday, July 29th. Citigroup increased their price objective on Brunswick from $92.00 to $101.00 and gave the stock a “buy” rating in a report on Friday, September 27th. Finally, Benchmark restated a “buy” rating and issued a $100.00 target price on shares of Brunswick in a research note on Friday, October 25th. Six investment analysts have rated the stock with a hold rating and eight have issued a buy rating to the stock. According to MarketBeat.com, the stock presently has an average rating of “Moderate Buy” and a consensus price target of $89.23. Brunswick Trading Up 1.5 % Shares of Brunswick stock opened at $82.37 on Friday. The stock has a market cap of $5.43 billion, a P/E ratio of 20.49 and a beta of 1.51. The company has a quick ratio of 0.74, a current ratio of 1.97 and a debt-to-equity ratio of 1.17. Brunswick Co. has a 12-month low of $69.05 and a 12-month high of $99.68. The business’s 50 day moving average is $81.81 and its 200-day moving average is $78.79. Brunswick Dividend Announcement The company also recently declared a quarterly dividend, which will be paid on Friday, December 13th. Shareholders of record on Wednesday, November 20th will be paid a $0.42 dividend. This represents a $1.68 dividend on an annualized basis and a yield of 2.04%. The ex-dividend date is Wednesday, November 20th. Brunswick’s dividend payout ratio is currently 41.79%. Insider Buying and Selling at Brunswick In other Brunswick news, Director Nancy E. Cooper sold 366 shares of Brunswick stock in a transaction on Friday, November 1st. The shares were sold at an average price of $80.19, for a total transaction of $29,349.54. Following the completion of the transaction, the director now directly owns 24,557 shares of the company’s stock, valued at $1,969,225.83. The trade was a 1.47 % decrease in their ownership of the stock. The transaction was disclosed in a document filed with the SEC, which is available through this hyperlink . Also, CEO David M. Foulkes sold 23,829 shares of the stock in a transaction dated Thursday, October 31st. The shares were sold at an average price of $80.22, for a total transaction of $1,911,562.38. Following the completion of the transaction, the chief executive officer now directly owns 251,094 shares in the company, valued at $20,142,760.68. The trade was a 8.67 % decrease in their ownership of the stock. The disclosure for this sale can be found here . Insiders sold a total of 28,940 shares of company stock worth $2,321,176 over the last quarter. 0.81% of the stock is currently owned by insiders. Brunswick Profile ( Free Report ) Brunswick Corporation designs, manufactures, and markets recreation products in the United States, Europe, the Asia-Pacific, Canada, and internationally. It operates through four segments: Propulsion, Engine P&A, Navico Group, and Boat. The Propulsion segment provides outboard, sterndrive, inboard engines, propulsion-related controls, rigging, and propellers for boat builders through marine retail dealers under the Mercury, Mercury MerCruiser, Mariner, Mercury Racing, Mercury Diesel, Avator, and Fliteboard brands. Featured Stories Five stocks we like better than Brunswick Stock Average Calculator Vertiv’s Cool Tech Makes Its Stock Red-Hot What Are the FAANG Stocks and Are They Good Investments? MarketBeat Week in Review – 11/18 – 11/22 How to Invest in Insurance Companies: A Guide 2 Finance Stocks With Competitive Advantages You Can’t Ignore Want to see what other hedge funds are holding BC? Visit HoldingsChannel.com to get the latest 13F filings and insider trades for Brunswick Co. ( NYSE:BC – Free Report ). Receive News & Ratings for Brunswick Daily - Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts' ratings for Brunswick and related companies with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter .Vikings escape with 30-27 win over Bears in overtime thriller
The Kerala BJP is witnessing internal turmoil following a humiliating defeat in the Palakkad Assembly bypoll. Party leaders, both covertly and overtly, have criticized the state leadership for its dismal performance in a constituency where the BJP was seen as having a strong chance of victory. After polling concluded on November 20, BJP state president K Surendran had expressed confidence in a comfortable win. However, the election result served as a stark setback, highlighting the party’s inability to capitalize on its decade-long influence in the Palakkad municipal region. The loss has exacerbated discontent within the party, exposing internal rifts and dissatisfaction among its ranks. The BJP’s vote share in Palakkad has dropped significantly, erasing gains made over the past decade. In 2016, Sobha Surendran garnered 40,076 votes (29.08%), while in 2021 E Sreedharan increased the tally to 50,220 votes (35.34%). This time, the party’s vote count plunged to 39,246 (28.63%), 830 votes fewer than in 2016. Advertisement The defeat has led to calls for accountability. Many leaders have intensified their criticism of K Surendran, with demands for him to take responsibility. BJP national council member N. Sivarajan hinted at top-level failures, stating, “The party’s foundation is intact, but its leadership needs strengthening.” State committee member CV Sajani also criticized the leadership, stating on Facebook that “BJP is no one’s waqf property.” Similarly, Palakkad district committee member Surendran Tharoor noted failures in candidate selection and campaign strategy. BJP vice president B. Gopalakrishnan publicly questioned Surendran’s role in the defeat. Another critical voice came from BJP state committee member Sandeep Vachaspati, who pointed out the irony of vote leakage occurring under the direct supervision of the state president. The decision to field C Krishna Kumar as the candidate, despite local opposition, has drawn ire from party members. Many believe that if Sobha Surendran had been nominated, the outcome would have been different. Local leaders felt that bypolls require a non-controversial, widely accepted candidate, which the state leadership overlooked. Adding to the BJP’s woes was the departure of Sandeep Warrier, a prominent leader who joined the Congress just before the election. His exit, coupled with allegations of factionalism within the BJP, has caused further damage. Warrier accused Surendran and a coterie, including former union minister V Muraleedharan and Krishna Kumar, of undemocratic practices and fostering internal discontent. The BJP’s alleged compromises with the ruling CPI(M) have also alienated its base. The failure to pursue high-profile corruption cases involving CPI(M) leaders and their allies has led to accusations of political collusion, further demoralizing cadres. Political observers argue that the central BJP leadership must also bear responsibility for the crisis. Prakash Javadekar, the party’s Kerala in-charge, reportedly dismissed Warrier’s grievances, a decision now seen as a missed opportunity to prevent his defection. The defeat in Palakkad underscores a broader challenge for the BJP in Kerala: addressing internal discord, regaining its core base, and rebuilding trust among cadres and supporters. AdvertisementCompetitively priced 2025 Chevrolet Blazer EV has plenty to recommend it
None
PM Wong’s speech a call for activists to go beyond grassroots work and explain policies: Observers - The Straits TimesSpringbok Du Toit named World Player of the Year for second time