circus theme party outfit

circus theme party outfit

PHILADELPHIA, PA, Dec. 04, 2024 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Five Below, Inc. FIVE , the trend-right, high-quality extreme-value retailer for teens and pre-teens, today announced the appointment of Winnie Park as Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and a member of its Board of Directors, effective December 16, 2024. An accomplished retail executive with a career spanning more than three decades, Ms. Park has extensive experience in driving customer-centric business strategies, merchandising and brand building across a broad spectrum of specialty and value retail. In her new role, she will partner closely with Kenneth Bull, who will continue as Five Below's Chief Operating Officer. In addition, Thomas Vellios, Co-founder, will continue as Executive Chairman, working alongside Ms. Park, Mr. Bull and the rest of the leadership team to drive the Company's strategic priorities. Ms. Park will be based in Philadelphia. "Winnie is a passionate retail visionary with a deep understanding of the consumer and the power at the intersection of trend and value," Mr. Vellios said. "The breadth of her leadership experience, especially her merchandising expertise, customer acumen, strong global background, and importantly, how she values people and champions organizational culture all make her uniquely suited for the role. Combined with Ken's expertise and deep knowledge of our business, I'm confident that together we will unlock tremendous potential for our customers and shareholders by delivering amazing product at exceptional value in a fun store experience." Ms. Park served as Chief Executive Officer of Forever 21 since January 2022, leading a transformational brand refresh for the fast-fashion company focused on younger consumers with a social-media-first approach to engaging with customers. Under Ms. Park's leadership, the brand launched its omnichannel capabilities, social commerce and an award-winning metaverse partnership with Roblox. She also expanded categories beyond women's apparel to include kid's, gift, beauty and accessories. Prior to Forever 21, Ms. Park was the CEO of Paper Source, where she drove the business from a traditional brick-and-mortar retailer to an omnichannel lifestyle brand. Under her leadership, Paper Source developed a robust digital presence, encompassing social media, digital content, online subscriptions and affiliate partnerships. Prior to Paper Source, Ms. Park served as Executive Vice President, Global Marketing and eCommerce, and Global VP, GMM, Merchandising, at Hong Kong-based international retail leader Duty Free Shoppers, a division of LVMH. At DFS, Ms. Park launched the company's first global eCommerce site, serving customers across China, Korea, Japan, Southeast Asia, the Middle East and the United States. Ms. Park has also led Women's Merchandising for Dockers at Levi Strauss & Co. and worked at McKinsey in fashion retail and consumer digital. Ms. Park served on the board of Dollar Tree from 2020 to 2024. She earned a BA from Princeton University and an MBA from Northwestern University. "I'm a huge fan of the Five Below brand and its unique ability to connect with and empower teens and pre-teens through an amazing assortment of extreme-value items in a fun shopping environment," said Ms. Park. "There is enormous opportunity to build on the exciting initiatives that are already underway as we elevate our product, value and experience. I am excited to be a part of the continued growth of the brand and to be partnering with Tom, Ken and the rest of the talented team as we execute on the long runway for growth ahead." Mr. Vellios continued, "I would like to extend a deep appreciation to Ken for his support as interim CEO over the past several months. His contributions have been critical in helping us refocus and create momentum in the business. I'm delighted that Ken is continuing in his role as COO, and on behalf of the board and the entire Five Below team, I want to thank him." Mr. Bull said, "I've been honored to call Five Below my home since 2005 and am thrilled to welcome Winnie to the team. Her experience, leadership style and deep focus on people – both customers and crew – make her a great fit. I am excited about the possibilities ahead and look forward to partnering with Winnie to unlock our full potential and drive the next phase of Five Below's growth." Forward-Looking Statements: This news release includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 as contained in Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, which reflect management's current views and estimates regarding the Company's industry, business strategy, goals and expectations concerning its market position, future operations, margins, profitability, capital expenditures, liquidity and capital resources, store count potential and other financial and operating information. Investors can identify these statements by the fact that they use words such as "anticipate," "assume," "believe," "continue," "could," "estimate," "expect," "intend," "may," "plan," "potential," "predict," "project," "future" and similar terms and phrases. The Company cannot assure investors that future developments affecting the Company will be those that it has anticipated. Actual results may differ materially from these expectations due to risks related to disruption to the global supply chain, risks related to the Company's strategy and expansion plans, risks related to our ability to attract, retain, and integrate qualified executive talent, risks related to disruptions in our information technology systems and our ability to maintain and upgrade those systems, risks related to the inability to successfully implement our online retail operations, risks related to cyberattacks or other cyber incidents, risks related to increased usage of machine learning and other types of artificial intelligence in our business, and challenges with properly managing its use; risks related to our ability to select, obtain, distribute and market merchandise profitably, risks related to our reliance on merchandise manufactured outside of the United States, the availability of suitable new store locations and the dependence on the volume of traffic to our stores, risks related to changes in consumer preferences and economic conditions, risks related to increased operating costs, including wage rates, risks related to inflation and increasing commodity prices, risks related to potential systematic failure of the banking system in the United States or globally, risks related to extreme weather, pandemic outbreaks, global political events, war, terrorism or civil unrest (including any resulting store closures, damage, or loss of inventory), risks related to leasing, owning or building distribution centers, risks related to our ability to successfully manage inventory balance and inventory shrinkage, quality or safety concerns about the Company's merchandise, increased competition from other retailers including online retailers, risks related to the seasonality of our business, risks related to our ability to protect our brand name and other intellectual property, risks related to customers' payment methods, risks related to domestic and foreign trade restrictions including duties and tariffs affecting our domestic and foreign suppliers and increasing our costs, including, among others, the direct and indirect impact of current and potential tariffs imposed and proposed by the United States on foreign imports, risks associated with the restrictions imposed by our indebtedness on our current and future operations, the impact of changes in tax legislation and accounting standards and risks associated with leasing substantial amounts of space. For further details and a discussion of these risks and uncertainties, see the Company's periodic reports, including the annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and current reports on Form 8-K, filed with or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission and available at www.sec.gov . If one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or if any of the Company's assumptions prove incorrect, the Company's actual results may vary in material respects from those projected in these forward-looking statements. Any forward-looking statement made by the Company in this news release speaks only as of the date on which the Company makes it. Factors or events that could cause the Company's actual results to differ may emerge from time to time, and it is not possible for the Company to predict all of them. The Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future developments or otherwise, except as may be required by any applicable securities laws. About Five Below Five Below is a leading high-growth value retailer offering trend-right, high-quality products loved by teens and pre-teens. We believe life is better when customers are free to "let go & have fun" in an amazing experience filled with unlimited possibilities. With most items priced between $1 and $5, and some extreme value items priced beyond $5 in our incredible Five Beyond Shop, Five Below makes it easy to say YES! to the newest, coolest stuff across eight awesome Five Below worlds: Style, Room, Sports, Tech, Create, Party, Candy and New & Now. Founded in 2002 and headquartered in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, Five Below today has over 1,750 stores in 44 states. For more information, please visit www.fivebelow.com or find Five Below on Instagram, TikTok and Facebook @FiveBelow. Investor Contact Christiane Pelz Vice President, Investor Relations Five Below, Inc. Investorrelations@fivebelow.com Media Contact Jessica Liddell Partner, ICR FiveBelowPR@icrinc.com © 2024 Benzinga.com. Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.Goals from Jamie Gittens, Ramy Bensebaini, and Serhou Guirassy secured a 3-0 victory for Borussia Dortmund over Dinamo Zagreb in the Champions League on Wednesday. English winger Gittens opened the scoring with a spectacular solo strike from the edge of the box before half-time. Bensebaini doubled the lead early in the second half, heading in Pascal Gross’s corner, while Guirassy sealed the win with a late goal after coming off the bench. The victory marked Dortmund’s first away win in any competition since September, moving them into the Champions League top four and virtually guaranteeing a place in the knockout rounds. “We did really well and didn’t allow many chances. We dominated possession—it was a really good game from us,” said Dortmund goalkeeper Gregor Kobel. Related News UCL: 'I’m ready to play any position,' Bellingham says before Liverpool clash UCL: Bayern Munich beat 10-man PSG 1-0 UCL: Arsenal thrash Sporting 5-1 in Lisbon masterclass Defender Nico Schlotterbeck added, “We controlled the game and are happy to have secured this important win in Zagreb.” Despite the triumph, Dortmund coach Nuri Sahin faces concerns over Julian Brandt’s fitness ahead of their crucial Bundesliga clash with Bayern Munich on Saturday. The midfielder limped off with a suspected thigh injury before half-time. The win extends Dortmund’s impressive Champions League campaign, with four victories from five matches. Their only blemish remains a 5-2 loss to Real Madrid in October’s final rematch. AFP

Manchester City boss Pep Guardiola has rubbished suggestions of a rift with Kevin De Bruyne, insisting he is “desperate” to have the playmaker back at his best. A number of prominent pundits, including former City defender and club ambassador Micah Richards, have questioned why the Belgium international has not been starting games amid the champions’ dramatic slump. City have not won in seven outings in all competitions – their worst run since 2008 – with De Bruyne featuring only as a substitute in the last five of those matches after recovering from a pelvic injury. The latest came with a 12-minute run-out in Sunday’s demoralising 2-0 defeat at Premier League leaders Liverpool, a result which left City 11 points off the pace and fifth in the table. Richards said on The Rest is Football podcast it appeared “there’s some sort of rift going on” between De Bruyne and Guardiola while former England striker Gary Lineker added: “It seems like all’s not well.” Former Liverpool defender Jamie Carragher said he felt “something isn’t right” and fellow Sky Sports analyst Gary Neville, the ex-Manchester United right-back, described the situation as “unusual, bizarre, strange”. Guardiola, speaking at a press conference to preview his side’s clash with Nottingham Forest, responded on Tuesday. The Spaniard said: “People say I’ve got a problem with Kevin. Do you think I like to not play with Kevin? No, I don’t want Kevin to play? “The guy who has the most talent in the final third, I don’t want it? I have a personal problem with him after nine years together? “He’s delivered to me the biggest success to this club, but he’s been five months injured (last season) and two months injured (this year). “He’s 33 years old. He needs time to find his best, like last season, step by step. He’ll try to do it and feel better. I’m desperate to have his best.” De Bruyne has not started since being forced off at half-time of City’s Champions League clash with Inter Milan on September 18, having picked up an injury in the previous game. Both the player and manager have spoken since of the pain he was in and the need to ease back into action, but his spell on the bench has been unexpectedly long. The resulting speculation has then been exacerbated because De Bruyne is in the final year of his contract but Guardiola maintains nothing untoward has occurred. He said: “I’d love to have the Kevin in his prime, 26 or 27. He would love it to – but he is not 26 or 27 any more. “He had injuries in the past, important and long ones. He is a guy who needs to be physically fit for his space and energy. You think I’m complaining? It’s normal, it’s nature. “He’s played in 10 or 11 seasons a lot of games and I know he is desperate to help us. He gives glimpses of brilliance that only he can have. “But, always I said, he himself will not solve our problems, like Erling (Haaland) won’t solve it himself. We attack and defend together. “We want the best players back. Hopefully step by step the confidence will come back and we’ll get the best of all of us.” We do not moderate comments, but we expect readers to adhere to certain rules in the interests of open and accountable debate.

DELAWARE, Ohio, Dec. 04, 2024 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Greif, Inc. GEF GEF.B)), a world leader in industrial packaging products and services, today announced fourth quarter and fiscal 2024 results. Fiscal Fourth Quarter 2024 Financial Highlights: (all results compared to the fourth quarter 2023 unless otherwise noted) Net income decreased 6.5% to $63.4 million or $1.08 per diluted Class A share compared to net income of $67.8 million or $1.16 per diluted Class A share. Net income, excluding the impact of adjustments (1) , decreased 46.4% to $49.6 million or $0.85 per diluted Class A share compared to net income, excluding the impact of adjustments, of $92.6 million or $1.59 per diluted Class A share. Adjusted EBITDA (2) decreased 2.0% to $197.6 million compared to Adjusted EBITDA of $201.6 million. Net cash provided by operating activities decreased by $16.3 million to $187.2 million. Adjusted free cash flow (3) increased by $8.5 million to $144.7 million. Fiscal Year Results Include: (all results compared to the fiscal year 2023 unless otherwise noted): Net income decreased 27.0% to $262.1 million or $4.52 per diluted Class A share compared to net income of $359.2 million or $6.15 per diluted Class A share. Net income, excluding the impact of adjustments, decreased 35.3% to $233.6 million or $4.03 per diluted Class A share compared to net income, excluding the impact of adjustments, of $361.2 million or $6.19 per diluted Class A share. Adjusted EBITDA decreased 15.6% to $694.2 million compared to Adjusted EBITDA of $822.2 million. Net cash provided by operating activities decreased by $293.5 million to $356.0 million. Adjusted free cash flow decreased by $291.4 million to $189.8 million. Total debt increased by $525.5 million to $2,740.6 million. Net debt (4) increased by $508.7 million to $2,542.9 million. The Company's leverage ratio (5) increased to 3.53x from 2.2x in the prior year quarter, and decreased from 3.64x sequentially. Strategic Actions and Announcements Hosting Investor Day on December 11, 2024, at Convene: 75 Rockefeller Plaza in New York City. Completed previously announced business model optimization project to fully leverage our core competitive advantages and facilitate accelerated growth. This operating model change will result in the following four new reportable segments beginning in the first quarter of 2025: Customized Polymer Solutions; Durable Metal Solutions; Sustainable Fiber Solutions; and Integrated Solutions. Related to our new segments, on Thursday, December 5, 2024, we will be releasing online the previous eight quarters of segment financial highlights to assist our investor community in modeling our new reportable segments. This information will be made available at our investor relations site https://investor.greif.com/ . Announcing targeted cost optimization effort to eliminate $100 million of structural costs from the business through a combination of SG&A rationalization, network optimization, and operating efficiency gains. More information on this effort will be provided at our upcoming Investor Day. Commentary from CEO Ole Rosgaard "I am pleased to report a solid fourth quarter and full year 2024 result, particularly in light of the continuation of this extended period of industrial contraction. While managing the business for the present, we also made significant strides under our Build to Last strategy towards the future, and our executive team and I look forward to sharing more information at our Investor Day next week. Our investors can expect an interactive and engaging half day session, and we highly encourage your in-person attendance as we look forward to 2025 and beyond." Build to Last Mission Progress Recently completed our fourteenth wave NPS (6) survey, receiving feedback from nearly five thousand customers globally for a net score of 69, recognized as a world-class score within the manufacturing industry. At our upcoming Investor Day, we plan to further discuss the powerful correlation between NPS, an indicator of our Legendary Customer Service, and financial performance. We thank our customers for their continued feedback, which is critical in helping us achieve our vision to be the best performing customer service company in the world, and we are proud to continue to earn positive feedback from our customers throughout a difficult global operating environment. (1) Adjustments that are excluded from net income before adjustments and from earnings per diluted Class A share before adjustments are acquisition and integration related costs, restructuring charges, non-cash asset impairment charges, non-cash pension settlement charges, (gain) loss on disposal of properties, plants and equipment, net, (gain) loss on disposal of businesses, net, and other costs. (2) Adjusted EBITDA is defined as net income, plus interest expense, net, plus income tax (benefit) expense, plus depreciation, depletion and amortization expense, plus acquisition and integration related costs, plus restructuring charges, plus non-cash asset impairment charges, plus non-cash pension settlement charges, plus (gain) loss on disposal of properties, plants and equipment, net, plus (gain) loss on disposal of businesses, net, plus other costs. (3) Adjusted free cash flow is defined as net cash provided by operating activities, less cash paid for purchases of properties, plants and equipment, plus cash paid for acquisition and integration related costs, plus cash paid for integration related Enterprise Resource Planning ("ERP") systems and equipment, plus cash paid for taxes related to Tama, Iowa mill divestment, plus cash paid for fiscal year-end change costs. (4) Net debt is defined as total debt less cash and cash equivalents. (5) Leverage ratio for the periods indicated is defined as adjusted net debt divided by trailing twelve month EBITDA, each as calculated under the terms of the Company's Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of March 1, 2022, filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended January 31, 2022 (the "2022 Credit Agreement"). As calculated under the 2022 Credit Agreement, adjusted net debt was $2,452.3 million, $2,608.5 million, and $1,856.8 million as of October 31, 2024, July 31, 2024 and October 31, 2023, respectively, and trailing twelve month credit agreement EBITDA was $695.0 million, $717.2 million, and $845.9 million as of October 31, 2024, July 31, 2024 and October 31, 2023, respectively. (6) Net Promoter Score ("NPS") is derived from a survey conducted by a third party that measures how likely a customer is to recommend Greif as a business partner. NPS scores are calculated by subtracting the percentage of detractors a business has from the percentage of its promoters. Note: A reconciliation of the differences between all non-GAAP financial measures used in this release with the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures is included in the financial schedules that are a part of this release. These non-GAAP financial measures are intended to supplement, and should be read together with, our financial results. They should not be considered an alternative or substitute for, and should not be considered superior to, our reported financial results. Accordingly, users of this financial information should not place undue reliance on these non-GAAP financial measures. Segment Results (all results compared to the fourth quarter of 2023 unless otherwise noted) Net sales are impacted mainly by the volume of primary products (7) sold, selling prices, product mix and the impact of changes in foreign currencies against the U.S. dollar. The table below shows the percentage impact of each of these items on net sales for our primary products for the fourth quarter of 2024 as compared to the prior year quarter for the business segments with manufacturing operations. Net sales from completed acquisitions of Reliance Products Ltd. ("Reliance") and Ipackchem Group SAS ("Ipackchem") primary products are not included in the table below, but will be included in their respective segments starting in the fiscal first quarter of 2025 for Reliance and fiscal third quarter of 2025 for Ipackchem. Net Sales Impact - Primary Products Global Industrial Packaging Paper Packaging & Services Currency Translation — % — % Volume 3.7 % 0.7 % Selling Prices and Product Mix 0.4 % 5.0 % Total Impact of Primary Products 4.1 % 5.7 % Global Industrial Packaging Net sales increased by $65.9 million to $786.9 million primarily due to contributions from recent acquisitions and higher volumes. Gross profit increased by $12.6 million to $167.0 million due to the same factors that impacted net sales, partially offset by higher raw material, labor and manufacturing costs. Operating profit decreased by $0.1 million to $75.0 million primarily due to higher SG&A expenses from recent acquisitions, offset by the same factors that impacted gross profit. Adjusted EBITDA increased by $4.0 million to $109.4 million primarily due to the same factors that impacted gross profit, partially offset by higher SG&A expenses from recent acquisitions. Paper Packaging & Services Net sales increased by $42.9 million to $624.5 million primarily due to higher average selling prices as a result of higher published containerboard and boxboard prices. Gross profit decreased by $0.1 million to $118.7 million primarily due to higher raw material and labor costs, offset by the same factors that impacted net sales. Operating profit increased by $13.4 million to $48.7 million primarily due to lower non-cash impairment charges and restructuring charges related to optimizing and rationalizing operations in the prior year, partially offset by the same factors that impacted gross profit and higher SG&A expenses related to higher health, medical, incentive and pension expenses. Adjusted EBITDA decreased by $8.4 million to $85.3 million primarily due to the same factors that impacted gross profit and higher SG&A expenses related to higher health, medical, incentive and pension expenses. Tax Summary During the fourth quarter, we recorded an income tax rate of 21.8 percent and a tax rate excluding the impact of adjustments of 39.6 percent. Note that the application of accounting for income taxes often causes fluctuations in our quarterly effective tax rates. For the full year, we recorded an income tax rate of 10.6 percent and a tax rate excluding the impact of adjustments of 12.8 percent. Dividend Summary On December 3, 2024, the Board of Directors declared quarterly cash dividends of $0.54 per share of Class A Common Stock and $0.80 per share of Class B Common Stock. Dividends are payable on January 1, 2025, to stockholders of record at the close of business on December 16, 2024. (7) Primary products are manufactured steel, plastic and fibre drums; new and reconditioned intermediate bulk containers; jerrycans and other small plastics; linerboard, containerboard, corrugated sheets and corrugated containers; and boxboard and tube and core products. Company Outlook Our markets have now experienced a multi-year period of industrial contraction, and we have not identified any compelling demand inflection on the horizon, despite slightly improved year over year volumes. While we believe we are well positioned for an eventual recovery of the industrial economy, at this time we believe it is appropriate to provide only low-end guidance based on the continuation of demand trends reflected in the past year, current price/cost factors in Paper Packaging and Services, and other identifiable discrete items which we will discuss during our fourth quarter earnings release call. Call-in details are provided below. (in millions, except per share amounts) Fiscal 2025 Low-End Guidance Estimate Adjusted EBITDA $675 Adjusted free cash flow $225 Note: Fiscal 2025 net income guidance, the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure to Adjusted EBITDA, is not provided in this release due to the potential for one or more of the following, the timing and magnitude of which we are unable to reliably forecast: gains or losses on the disposal of businesses or properties, plants and equipment, net; non-cash asset impairment charges due to unanticipated changes in the business; restructuring-related activities; acquisition and integration related costs; and ongoing initiatives under our Build to Last strategy. No reconciliation of the 2025 low-end guidance estimate of Adjusted EBITDA, a non-GAAP financial measure which excludes restructuring charges, acquisition and integration related costs, non-cash asset impairment charges, and (gain) loss on the disposal of properties, plants and equipment, (gain) loss on the disposal of businesses, net, and other costs, is included in this release because, due to the high variability and difficulty in making accurate forecasts and projections of some of the excluded information, together with some of the excluded information not being ascertainable or accessible, we are unable to quantify certain amounts that would be required to be included in net income, the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure, without unreasonable efforts. A reconciliation of 2025 low-end guidance estimate of adjusted free cash flow to fiscal 2025 forecasted net cash provided by operating activities, the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure, is included in this release. Conference Call The Company will host a conference call to discuss the fourth quarter and fiscal 2024 results on December 5, 2024, at 8:30 a.m. Eastern Time (ET). Participants may access the call using the following online registration link: https://register.vevent.com/register/BId6a2105d615e45438d7c615c6b1ce4d5 . Registrants will receive a confirmation email containing dial in details and a unique conference call code for entry. Phone lines will open at 8:00 a.m. ET on December 5, 2024. A digital replay of the conference call will be available two hours following the call on the Company's web site at http://inv estor .greif.com . Investor Relations contact information Bill D'Onofrio, Vice President, Corporate Development & Investor Relations, 614-499-7233. Bill.Donofrio@greif.com About Greif Greif is a global leader in industrial packaging products and services and is pursuing its vision: to be the best performing customer service company in the world. The Company produces steel, plastic and fibre drums, intermediate bulk containers, reconditioned containers, jerrycans and other small plastics, containerboard, uncoated recycled paperboard, coated recycled paperboard, tubes and cores and a diverse mix of specialty products. The Company also manufactures packaging accessories and provides other services for a wide range of industries. In addition, the Company manages timber properties in the southeastern United States. The Company is strategically positioned in over 35 countries to serve global as well as regional customers. Additional information is on the Company's website at www.greif.com . Forward-Looking Statements This release contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The words "may," "will," "expect," "intend," "estimate," "anticipate," "aspiration," "objective," "project," "believe," "continue," "on track" or "target" or the negative thereof and similar expressions, among others, identify forward-looking statements. All forward-looking statements are based on assumptions, expectations and other information currently available to management. Although the Company believes that the expectations reflected in forward-looking statements have a reasonable basis, the Company can give no assurance that these expectations will prove to be correct. Such forward-looking statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that could cause the Company's actual results to differ materially from those forecasted, projected or anticipated, whether expressed or implied. Such risks and uncertainties that might cause a difference include, but are not limited to, the following: (i) historically, our business has been sensitive to changes in general economic or business conditions, (ii) our global operations subject us to political risks, instability and currency exchange that could adversely affect our results of operations, (iii) the current and future challenging global economy and disruption and volatility of the financial and credit markets may adversely affect our business, (iv) the continuing consolidation of our customer base and suppliers may intensify pricing pressure, (v) we operate in highly competitive industries, (vi) our business is sensitive to changes in industry demands and customer preferences, (vii) raw material shortages, price fluctuations, global supply chain disruptions and increased inflation may adversely impact our results of operations, (viii) energy and transportation price fluctuations and shortages may adversely impact our manufacturing operations and costs, (ix) we may encounter difficulties or liabilities arising from acquisitions or divestitures, (x) we may incur additional rationalization costs and there is no guarantee that our efforts to reduce costs will be successful, (xi) several operations are conducted by joint ventures that we cannot operate solely for our benefit, (xii) certain of the agreements that govern our joint ventures provide our partners with put or call options, (xiii) our ability to attract, develop and retain talented and qualified employees, managers and executives is critical to our success, (xiv) our business may be adversely impacted by work stoppages and other labor relations matters, (xv) we may be subject to losses that might not be covered in whole or in part by existing insurance reserves or insurance coverage and general insurance premium and deductible increases, (xvi) our business depends on the uninterrupted operations of our facilities, systems and business functions, including our information technology and other business systems, (xvii) a cyber-attack, security breach of customer, employee, supplier or Company information and data privacy risks and costs of compliance with new regulations may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows, (xviii) we could be subject to changes in our tax rates, the adoption of new U.S. or foreign tax legislation or exposure to additional tax liabilities, (xix) we have a significant amount of goodwill and long-lived assets which, if impaired in the future, would adversely impact our results of operations, (xx) changing climate, global climate change regulations and greenhouse gas effects may adversely affect our operations and financial performance, (xxi) we may be unable to achieve our greenhouse gas emission reduction target by 2030, (xxii) legislation/regulation related to environmental and health and safety matters could negatively impact our operations and financial performance, (xxiii) product liability claims and other legal proceedings could adversely affect our operations and financial performance, and (xxiv) we may incur fines or penalties, damage to our reputation or other adverse consequences if our employees, agents or business partners violate, or are alleged to have violated, anti-bribery, competition or other laws. The risks described above are not all-inclusive, and given these and other possible risks and uncertainties, investors should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements as a prediction of actual results. For a detailed discussion of the most significant risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those forecasted, projected or anticipated, see "Risk Factors" in Part I, Item 1A of our most recently filed Form 10-K and our other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. All forward-looking statements made in this news release are expressly qualified in their entirety by reference to such risk factors. Except to the limited extent required by applicable law, we undertake no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. GREIF, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME UNAUDITED Three Months Ended October 31, Twelve Months Ended October 31, (in millions, except per share amounts) 2024 2023 2024 2023 Net sales $ 1,417.1 $ 1,308.4 $ 5,448.1 $ 5,218.6 Cost of products sold 1,128.4 1,032.7 4,377.3 4,072.5 Gross profit 288.7 275.7 1,070.8 1,146.1 Selling, general and administrative expenses 157.5 136.8 634.5 549.1 Acquisition and integration related costs 2.4 3.5 18.5 19.0 Restructuring charges 3.8 5.2 5.4 18.7 Non-cash asset impairment charges 0.7 16.9 2.6 20.3 (Gain) loss on disposal of properties, plants and equipment, net (2.4 ) 0.8 (8.8 ) (2.5 ) (Gain) loss on disposal of businesses, net 0.1 0.1 (46.0 ) (64.0 ) Operating profit 126.6 112.4 464.6 605.5 Interest expense, net 39.2 24.8 134.9 96.3 Non-cash pension settlement charges — 3.5 — 3.5 Other (income) expense, net 0.6 1.4 10.1 11.0 Income before income tax expense and equity earnings of unconsolidated affiliates, net 86.8 82.7 319.6 494.7 Income tax (benefit) expense 18.9 9.9 33.9 117.8 Equity earnings of unconsolidated affiliates, net of tax (0.9 ) (0.5 ) (3.0 ) (2.2 ) Net income 68.8 73.3 288.7 379.1 Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests (5.4 ) (5.5 ) (26.6 ) (19.9 ) Net income attributable to Greif, Inc. $ 63.4 $ 67.8 $ 262.1 $ 359.2 Basic earnings per share attributable to Greif, Inc. common shareholders: Class A common stock $ 1.09 $ 1.19 $ 4.54 $ 6.22 Class B common stock $ 1.64 $ 1.78 $ 6.80 $ 9.32 Diluted earnings per share attributable to Greif, Inc. common shareholders: Class A common stock $ 1.08 $ 1.16 $ 4.52 $ 6.15 Class B common stock $ 1.64 $ 1.78 $ 6.80 $ 9.32 Shares used to calculate basic earnings per share attributable to Greif, Inc. common shareholders: Class A common stock 25.8 25.5 25.8 25.6 Class B common stock 21.3 21.3 21.3 21.5 Shares used to calculate diluted earnings per share attributable to Greif, Inc. common shareholders: Class A common stock 26.3 26.0 26.0 26.0 Class B common stock 21.3 21.3 21.3 21.5 GREIF, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS UNAUDITED (in millions) October 31, 2024 October 31, 2023 ASSETS CURRENT ASSETS Cash and cash equivalents $ 197.7 $ 180.9 Trade accounts receivable 757.1 659.4 Inventories 396.8 338.6 Other current assets 197.1 190.2 1,548.7 1,369.1 LONG-TERM ASSETS Goodwill 1,953.7 1,693.0 Intangible assets 937.1 792.2 Operating lease assets 284.5 290.3 Other long-term assets 270.3 253.6 3,445.6 3,029.1 PROPERTIES, PLANTS AND EQUIPMENT, NET 1,652.1 1,562.6 $ 6,646.4 $ 5,960.8 LIABILITIES AND EQUITY CURRENT LIABILITIES Accounts payable $ 530.4 $ 497.8 Short-term borrowings 18.6 5.4 Current portion of long-term debt 95.8 88.3 Current portion of operating lease liabilities 56.5 53.8 Other current liabilities 310.6 294.0 1,011.9 939.3 LONG-TERM LIABILITIES Long-term debt 2,626.2 2,121.4 Operating lease liabilities 230.2 240.2 Other long-term liabilities 537.4 548.3 3,393.8 2,909.9 REDEEMABLE NONCONTROLLING INTERESTS 129.9 125.3 EQUITY Total Greif, Inc. equity 2,075.7 1,947.9 Noncontrolling interests 35.1 38.4 2,110.8 1,986.3 $ 6,646.4 $ 5,960.8 GREIF, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS UNAUDITED Three Months Ended October 31, Twelve Months Ended October 31, (in millions) 2024 2023 2024 2023 CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: Net income $ 68.8 73.3 $ 288.7 $ 379.1 Depreciation, depletion and amortization 67.9 61.2 261.3 230.6 Asset impairments 0.7 16.9 2.6 20.3 Pension settlement charges — 3.5 — 3.5 Deferred income tax expense (benefit) (23.2 ) (27.8 ) (76.8 ) (28.7 ) Gain on disposal of businesses, net 0.1 — (46.0 ) (64.0 ) Other non-cash adjustments to net income 8.9 15.7 50.9 50.4 Operating working capital changes 52.4 57.7 (49.9 ) 151.5 Increase (decrease) in cash from changes in other assets and liabilities 11.6 3.0 (74.8 ) (93.2 ) Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities 187.2 203.5 356.0 649.5 CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: Acquisitions of companies, net of cash acquired (1.2 ) (94.9 ) (568.8 ) (542.4 ) Purchases of properties, plants and equipment (45.1 ) (77.2 ) (186.5 ) (213.6 ) Proceeds from the sale of properties, plants and equipment and businesses, net of impacts from the purchase of acquisitions 93.4 0.6 103.9 113.9 Payments for deferred purchase price of acquisitions — (0.4 ) (1.7 ) (22.1 ) Other (1.6 ) (1.6 ) (5.2 ) (6.0 ) Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities 45.5 (173.5 ) (658.3 ) (670.2 ) CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: Payments on long-term debt, net (171.8 ) 47.6 489.4 290.7 Dividends paid to Greif, Inc. shareholders (31.2 ) (29.8 ) (121.0 ) (116.5 ) Payments for share repurchases — — — (63.9 ) Tax withholding payments for stock-based awards — — (10.6 ) (13.7 ) Other (14.4 ) (10.1 ) (33.5 ) (26.9 ) Net cash (used in) provided by for financing activities (217.4 ) 7.7 324.3 69.7 Effects of exchange rates on cash (11.8 ) (14.5 ) (5.2 ) (15.2 ) Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents 3.5 23.2 16.8 33.8 Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period 194.2 157.7 180.9 147.1 Cash and cash equivalents, end of period $ 197.7 $ 180.9 $ 197.7 $ 180.9 GREIF, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS BY SEGMENT UNAUDITED Three Months Ended October 31, Twelve Months Ended October 31, (in millions) 2024 2023 2024 2023 Net sales: Global Industrial Packaging $ 786.9 $ 721.0 $ 3,124.3 $ 2,936.8 Paper Packaging & Services 624.5 581.6 2,303.5 2,260.5 Land Management 5.7 5.8 20.3 21.3 Total net sales $ 1,417.1 $ 1,308.4 $ 5,448.1 $ 5,218.6 Gross profit: Global Industrial Packaging $ 167.0 $ 154.4 $ 669.4 $ 634.4 Paper Packaging & Services 118.7 118.8 391.6 502.5 Land Management 3.0 2.5 9.8 9.2 Total gross profit $ 288.7 $ 275.7 $ 1,070.8 $ 1,146.1 Operating profit: Global Industrial Packaging $ 75.0 $ 75.1 $ 341.1 $ 334.3 Paper Packaging & Services 48.7 35.3 115.6 264.1 Land Management 2.9 2.0 7.9 7.1 Total operating profit $ 126.6 $ 112.4 $ 464.6 $ 605.5 EBITDA (8) : Global Industrial Packaging $ 108.0 $ 96.2 $ 454.8 $ 415.7 Paper Packaging & Services 83.3 70.4 253.9 398.8 Land Management 3.5 2.6 10.1 9.3 Total EBITDA $ 194.8 $ 169.2 $ 718.8 $ 823.8 Adjusted EBITDA (9) : Global Industrial Packaging $ 109.4 $ 105.4 $ 423.6 $ 425.4 Paper Packaging & Services 85.3 93.7 261.5 387.9 Land Management 2.9 2.5 9.1 8.9 Total Adjusted EBITDA $ 197.6 $ 201.6 $ 694.2 $ 822.2 (8) EBITDA is defined as net income, plus interest expense, net, plus income tax (benefit) expense, plus depreciation, depletion and amortization. However, because the Company does not calculate net income by segment, this table calculates EBITDA by segment with reference to operating profit by segment, which, as demonstrated in the table of Consolidated EBITDA, is another method to achieve the same result. See the reconciliations in the table of Segment EBITDA. (9) Adjusted EBITDA is defined as net income, plus interest expense, net, plus income tax (benefit) expense, plus depreciation, depletion and amortization expense, plus acquisition and integration related costs, plus restructuring charges, plus non-cash asset impairment charges, plus non-cash pension settlement charges, plus gain (loss) on disposal of properties, plants and equipment, (gain) loss on disposal of businesses, net, plus other costs. GREIF, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES GAAP TO NON-GAAP RECONCILIATION CONSOLIDATED ADJUSTED EBITDA UNAUDITED Three Months Ended October 31, Twelve Months Ended October 31, (in millions) 2024 2023 2024 2023 Net income $ 68.8 $ 73.3 $ 288.7 $ 379.1 Plus: Interest expense, net 39.2 24.8 134.9 96.3 Plus: Income tax (benefit) expense 18.9 9.9 33.9 117.8 Plus: Depreciation, depletion and amortization expense 67.9 61.2 261.3 230.6 EBITDA $ 194.8 $ 169.2 $ 718.8 $ 823.8 Net income $ 68.8 $ 73.3 $ 288.7 $ 379.1 Plus: Interest expense, net 39.2 24.8 134.9 96.3 Plus: Non-cash pension settlement charges — 3.5 — 3.5 Plus: Other (income) expense, net 0.6 1.4 10.1 11.0 Plus: Income tax (benefit) expense 18.9 9.9 33.9 117.8 Plus: Equity earnings of unconsolidated affiliates, net of tax (0.9 ) (0.5 ) (3.0 ) (2.2 ) Operating profit 126.6 112.4 464.6 605.5 Less: Non-cash pension settlement charges — 3.5 — 3.5 Less: Other (income) expense, net 0.6 1.4 10.1 11.0 Less: Equity earnings of unconsolidated affiliates, net of tax (0.9 ) (0.5 ) (3.0 ) (2.2 ) Plus: Depreciation, depletion and amortization expense 67.9 61.2 261.3 230.6 EBITDA $ 194.8 $ 169.2 $ 718.8 $ 823.8 Plus: Acquisition and integration related costs 2.4 3.5 18.5 19.0 Plus: Restructuring charges $ 3.8 $ 5.2 $ 5.4 $ 18.7 Plus: Non-cash asset impairment charges 0.7 16.9 2.6 20.3 Plus: (Gain) loss on disposal of properties, plants and equipment, net (2.4 ) 0.8 (8.8 ) (2.5 ) Plus: (Gain) loss on disposal of businesses, net 0.1 0.1 (46.0 ) (64.0 ) Plus: Non-cash pension settlement charges — 3.5 — 3.5 Plus: Other costs* (1.8 ) 2.4 3.7 3.4 Adjusted EBITDA $ 197.6 $ 201.6 $ 694.2 $ 822.2 *includes fiscal year-end change costs and share-based compensation impact of disposals of businesses GREIF, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES GAAP TO NON-GAAP RECONCILIATION SEGMENT ADJUSTED EBITDA (10) UNAUDITED Three Months Ended October 31, Twelve Months Ended October 31, (in millions) 2024 2023 2024 2023 Global Industrial Packaging Operating profit $ 75.0 $ 75.1 $ 341.1 $ 334.3 Less: Non-cash pension settlement charges — 3.5 — 3.5 Less: Other (income) expense, net 0.9 1.7 11.6 12.6 Less: Equity earnings of unconsolidated affiliates, net of tax (0.9 ) (0.5 ) (3.0 ) (2.2 ) Plus: Depreciation and amortization expense 33.0 25.8 122.3 95.3 EBITDA $ 108.0 $ 96.2 $ 454.8 $ 415.7 Plus: Acquisition and integration related costs 1.1 3.4 17.2 12.2 Plus: Restructuring charges 3.0 — (2.8 ) 4.2 Plus: Non-cash asset impairment charges 0.8 0.4 1.3 1.9 Plus: (Gain) loss on disposal of properties, plants and equipment, net (2.6 ) 0.2 (2.9 ) (4.4 ) Plus: (Gain) loss on disposal of businesses, net 0.1 0.5 (46.0 ) (9.4 ) Plus: Non-cash pension settlement charges — 3.5 — 3.5 Plus: Other costs* (1.0 ) 1.2 2.0 1.7 Adjusted EBITDA $ 109.4 $ 105.4 $ 423.6 $ 425.4 Paper Packaging & Services Operating profit $ 48.7 $ 35.3 $ 115.6 $ 264.1 Less: Other (income) expense, net (0.3 ) (0.3 ) (1.5 ) (1.6 ) Plus: Depreciation and amortization expense 34.3 34.8 136.8 133.1 EBITDA $ 83.3 $ 70.4 $ 253.9 $ 398.8 Plus: Acquisition and integration related costs 1.3 0.1 1.3 6.8 Plus: Restructuring charges 0.8 5.2 8.2 14.5 Plus: Non-cash asset impairment charges (0.1 ) 16.5 1.3 18.4 Plus: (Gain) loss on disposal of properties, plants and equipment, net 0.8 0.7 (4.9 ) 2.3 Plus: (Gain) loss on disposal of businesses, net — (0.4 ) — (54.6 ) Plus: Other costs* (0.8 ) 1.2 1.7 1.7 Adjusted EBITDA $ 85.3 $ 93.7 $ 261.5 $ 387.9 Land Management Operating profit $ 2.9 $ 2.0 $ 7.9 $ 7.1 Plus: Depreciation, depletion and amortization expense 0.6 0.6 2.2 2.2 EBITDA $ 3.5 $ 2.6 $ 10.1 $ 9.3 Plus: (Gain) loss on disposal of properties, plants and equipment, net (0.6 ) (0.1 ) (1.0 ) (0.4 ) Adjusted EBITDA $ 2.9 $ 2.5 $ 9.1 $ 8.9 Consolidated EBITDA $ 194.8 $ 169.2 $ 718.8 $ 823.8 Consolidated Adjusted EBITDA $ 197.6 $ 201.6 $ 694.2 $ 822.2 *includes fiscal year-end change costs and share-based compensation impact of disposals of businesses (10) Adjusted EBITDA is defined as net income, plus interest expense, net, plus income tax (benefit) expense, plus depreciation, depletion and amortization expense, plus acquisition and integration related costs, plus restructuring charges, plus non-cash asset impairment charges, plus non-cash pension settlement charges, plus (gain) loss on disposal of properties, plants and equipment, plus (gain) loss on disposal of businesses, net, plus other costs. However, because the Company does not calculate net income by segment, this table calculates adjusted EBITDA by segment with reference to operating profit by segment, which, as demonstrated in the table of consolidated adjusted EBITDA, is another method to achieve the same result. GREIF, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES GAAP TO NON-GAAP RECONCILIATION ADJUSTED FREE CASH FLOW (11) UNAUDITED Three Months Ended October 31, Twelve Months Ended October 31, (in millions) 2024 2023 2024 2023 Net cash provided by operating activities $ 187.2 $ 203.5 $ 356.0 $ 649.5 Cash paid for purchases of properties, plants and equipment (45.1 ) (77.2 ) (186.5 ) (213.6 ) Free Cash Flow $ 142.1 $ 126.3 $ 169.5 $ 435.9 Cash paid for acquisition and integration related costs 2.4 3.5 18.5 19.0 Cash paid for integration related ERP systems and equipment (12) 0.2 1.0 1.3 4.6 Cash paid for taxes related to Tama, Iowa mill divestment — 5.4 — 21.7 Cash paid for fiscal year-end change costs — — 0.5 — Adjusted Free Cash Flow $ 144.7 $ 136.2 $ 189.8 $ 481.2 (11) Adjusted free cash flow is defined as net cash provided by operating activities, less cash paid for purchases of properties, plants and equipment, plus cash paid for acquisition and integration related costs, net, plus cash paid for integration related ERP systems and equipment, plus cash paid for taxes related to Tama, Iowa mill divestment, plus cash paid for fiscal year-end change costs. (12) Cash paid for integration related ERP systems and equipment is defined as cash paid for ERP systems and equipment required to bring the acquired facilities to Greif's standards. GREIF, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES GAAP TO NON-GAAP RECONCILIATION NET INCOME, CLASS A EARNINGS PER SHARE, AND TAX RATE BEFORE ADJUSTMENTS UNAUDITED (in millions, except for per share amounts) Income before Income Tax Expense and Equity Earnings of Unconsolidated Affiliates, net Income Tax (Benefit) Expense Equity Earnings Noncontrolling Interest Net Income Attributable to Greif, Inc. Diluted Class A Earnings Per Share Tax Rate Three Months Ended October 31, 2024 $ 86.8 $ 18.9 $ (0.9 ) $ 5.4 $ 63.4 $ 1.08 21.8 % Acquisition and integration related costs 2.4 0.5 — — 1.9 0.03 Restructuring charges 3.8 0.9 — — 2.9 0.05 Non-cash asset impairment charges 0.7 0.2 — — 0.5 0.01 (Gain) loss on disposal of properties, plants and equipment, net (2.4 ) (0.5 ) — — (1.9 ) (0.03 ) (Gain) loss on disposal of businesses, net 0.1 16.0 — — (15.9 ) (0.27 ) Other costs* (1.8 ) (0.5 ) — — (1.3 ) (0.02 ) Excluding Adjustments $ 89.6 $ 35.5 $ (0.9 ) $ 5.4 $ 49.6 $ 0.85 39.6 % Three Months Ended October 31, 2023 $ 82.7 $ 9.9 $ (0.5 ) $ 5.5 $ 67.8 $ 1.16 12.0 % Acquisition and integration related costs 3.5 0.8 — — 2.7 0.04 Restructuring charges 5.2 1.2 — — 4.0 0.08 Non-cash asset impairment charges 16.9 4.1 — — 12.8 0.22 (Gain) loss on disposal of properties, plants and equipment, net 0.8 0.3 — — 0.5 0.01 (Gain) loss on disposal of businesses, net 0.1 0.3 — — (0.2 ) (0.01 ) Non-cash pension settlement charges 3.5 0.2 — — 3.3 0.06 Other costs* 2.4 0.7 — — 1.7 0.03 Excluding Adjustments $ 115.1 $ 17.5 $ (0.5 ) $ 5.5 $ 92.6 $ 1.59 15.2 % Twelve Months Ended October 31, 2024 $ 319.6 $ 33.9 $ (3.0 ) $ 26.6 $ 262.1 $ 4.52 10.6 % Acquisition and integration related costs 18.5 4.5 — — 14.0 0.24 Restructuring charges 5.4 1.2 — — 4.2 0.07 Non-cash asset impairment charges 2.6 0.7 — — 1.9 0.03 (Gain) loss on disposal of properties, plants and equipment, net (8.8 ) (2.1 ) — — (6.7 ) (0.11 ) (Gain) loss on disposal of businesses, net (46.0 ) (1.3 ) — — (44.7 ) (0.77 ) Other costs* 3.7 0.9 — — 2.8 0.05 Excluding Adjustments $ 295.0 $ 37.8 $ (3.0 ) $ 26.6 $ 233.6 $ 4.03 12.8 % Twelve Months Ended October 31, 2023 $ 494.7 $ 117.8 $ (2.2 ) $ 19.9 $ 359.2 $ 6.15 23.8 % Acquisition and integration related costs 19.0 4.6 — — 14.4 0.24 Restructuring charges 18.7 4.4 — 0.1 14.2 0.25 Non-cash asset impairment charges 20.3 4.9 — — 15.4 0.26 (Gain) loss on disposal of properties, plants and equipment, net (2.5 ) (0.3 ) — — (2.2 ) (0.04 ) (Gain) loss on disposal of businesses, net (64.0 ) (18.4 ) — — (45.6 ) (0.78 ) Non-cash pension settlement charges 3.5 0.2 — — 3.3 0.06 Other costs* 3.4 0.9 — — 2.5 0.05 Excluding Adjustments $ 493.1 $ 114.1 $ (2.2 ) $ 20.0 $ 361.2 $ 6.19 23.1 % *includes fiscal year-end change costs and share-based compensation impact of disposals of businesses The impact of income tax (benefit) expense and noncontrolling interest on each adjustment is calculated based on tax rates and ownership percentages specific to each applicable entity. GREIF INC. AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES GAAP TO NON-GAAP RECONCILIATION NET DEBT UNAUDITED (in millions) October 31, 2024 July 31, 2024 October 31, 2023 Total Debt $ 2,740.6 $ 2,909.5 $ 2,215.1 Cash and cash equivalents (197.7 ) (194.2 ) (180.9 ) Net Debt $ 2,542.9 $ 2,715.3 $ 2,034.2 GREIF, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES GAAP TO NON-GAAP RECONCILIATION LEVERAGE RATIO UNAUDITED Trailing Twelve Month Credit Agreement EBITDA (in millions) Trailing Twelve Months Ended 10/31/2024 Trailing Twelve Months Ended 7/31/2024 Trailing Twelve Months Ended 10/31/2023 Net income $ 288.7 $ 293.2 $ 379.1 Plus: Interest expense, net 134.9 120.5 96.3 Plus: Income tax expense 33.9 24.9 117.8 Plus: Depreciation, depletion and amortization expense 261.3 254.6 230.6 EBITDA $ 718.8 $ 693.2 $ 823.8 Plus: Acquisition and integration related costs 18.5 19.6 19.0 Plus: Restructuring charges 5.4 6.8 18.7 Plus: Non-cash asset impairment charges 2.6 18.8 20.3 Plus: (Gain) loss on disposal of properties, plants and equipment, net (8.8 ) (5.6 ) (2.5 ) Plus: (Gain) loss on disposal of businesses, net (46.0 ) (46.0 ) (64.0 ) Plus: Non-cash pension settlement charges — 3.5 3.5 Plus: Other costs* 3.7 5.5 3.4 Adjusted EBITDA $ 694.2 $ 695.8 $ 822.2 Credit Agreement adjustments to EBITDA (13) 0.8 21.4 23.7 Credit Agreement EBITDA $ 695.0 $ 717.2 $ 845.9 Adjusted Net Debt (in millions) For the Period Ended 10/31/2024 Trailing Twelve Months Ended 7/31/2024 For the Period Ended 10/31/2023 Total debt $ 2,740.6 $ 2,909.5 $ 2,215.1 Cash and cash equivalents (197.7 ) (194.2 ) (180.9 ) Net debt $ 2,542.9 $ 2,715.3 $ 2,034.2 Credit Agreement adjustments to debt (14) (90.6 ) (106.8 ) (177.4 ) Adjusted net debt $ 2,452.3 $ 2,608.5 $ 1,856.8 Leverage Ratio (15) 3.53x 3.64x 2.2x *includes fiscal year-end change costs and share-based compensation impact of disposals of businesses (13) Adjustments to EBITDA are specified by the 2022 Credit Agreement and include certain timberland gains, equity earnings of unconsolidated affiliates, net of tax, certain acquisition savings, deferred financing costs, capitalized interest, income and expense in connection with asset dispositions, and other items. (14) Adjustments to net debt are specified by the 2022 Credit Agreement and include the European accounts receivable program, letters of credit, and balances for swap contracts. (15) Leverage ratio is defined as Credit Agreement adjusted net debt divided by Credit Agreement adjusted EBITDA. The following table presents net sales by reportable segments and geographic operating segments, depreciation, depletion and amortization expenses by reportable segments, and capital expenditures by reportable segments for fiscal years 2024 and 2023. The following information is unaudited: Twelve Months Ended October 31, 2024 Twelve Months Ended October 31, 2023 (in millions) United States Europe, Middle East and Africa Asia Pacific and Other Americas United States Europe, Middle East and Africa Asia Pacific and Other Americas Global Industrial Packaging $ 1,124.0 $ 1,388.0 $ 612.3 $ 1,093.0 $ 1,310.9 $ 532.9 Paper Packaging & Services 2,261.4 — 42.1 2,218.0 — 42.5 Land Management 20.3 — — 21.3 — — Total net sales $ 3,405.7 $ 1,388.0 $ 654.4 $ 3,332.3 $ 1,310.9 $ 575.4 Twelve Months Ended October 31, (in millions) 2024 2023 Depreciation, depletion and amortization expense: Global Industrial Packaging $ 122.3 $ 95.3 Paper Packaging & Services 136.8 133.1 Land Management 2.2 2.2 Total depreciation, depletion and amortization expense $ 261.3 $ 230.6 Capital expenditures: Global Industrial Packaging $ 70.8 $ 83.9 Paper Packaging & Services 88.9 120.6 Land Management 0.2 1.1 Total segment 159.9 205.6 Corporate and other 9.1 12.6 Total capital expenditures $ 169.0 $ 218.2 GREIF, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES PROJECTED 2025 GUIDANCE RECONCILIATION ADJUSTED FREE CASH FLOW UNAUDITED Fiscal 2025 Low-End Guidance Estimate (in millions) Net cash provided by operating activities $ 371.0 Cash paid for purchases of properties, plants and equipment (166.0 ) Free cash flow $ 205.0 Cash paid for acquisition and integration related costs 17.0 Cash paid for integration related ERP systems and equipment 1.0 Cash paid for fiscal year-end change costs 2.0 Adjusted free cash flow $ 225.0 © 2024 Benzinga.com. Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.LAS VEGAS (AP) — Formula 1 on Monday at last said it will expand its grid in 2026 to make room for an American team that is partnered with General Motors. Read this article for free: Already have an account? To continue reading, please subscribe: * LAS VEGAS (AP) — Formula 1 on Monday at last said it will expand its grid in 2026 to make room for an American team that is partnered with General Motors. Read unlimited articles for free today: Already have an account? LAS VEGAS (AP) — Formula 1 on Monday at last said it will expand its grid in 2026 to make room for an American team that is partnered with General Motors. “As the pinnacle of motorsports, F1 demands boundary-pushing innovation and excellence. It’s an honor for General Motors and Cadillac to join the world’s premier racing series, and we’re committed to competing with passion and integrity to elevate the sport for race fans around the world,” GM President Mark Reuss said. “This is a global stage for us to demonstrate GM’s engineering expertise and technology leadership at an entirely new level.” The approval ends years of wrangling that launched a U.S. Justice Department investigation into why Colorado-based Liberty Media, the commercial rights holder of F1, would not approve the team initially started by Michael Andretti. Andretti in September stepped aside from leading his namesake organization, so the 11th team will be called Cadillac F1 and be run by new Andretti Global majority owners Dan Towriss and Mark Walter. The team will use Ferrari engines its first two years until GM has a Cadillac engine built for competition in time for the 2028 season. Towriss is the the CEO and president of Group 1001 and entered motorsports via Andretti’s IndyCar team when he signed on financial savings platform Gainbridge as a sponsor. Towriss is now a major part of the motorsports scene with ownership stakes in both Spire Motorsports’ NASCAR team and Wayne Taylor Racing’s sports car team. Walter is the chief executive of financial services firm Guggenheim Partners and the controlling owner of both the World Series champion Los Angeles Dodgers and Premier League club Chelsea. “We’re excited to partner with General Motors in bringing a dynamic presence to Formula 1,” Towriss said. “Together, we’re assembling a world-class team that will embody American innovation and deliver unforgettable moments to race fans around the world.’’ Mario Andretti, the 1978 F1 world champion, will have an ambassador role with Cadillac F1. But his son, Michael, will have no official position with the organization now that he has scaled back his involvement with Andretti Global. The approval has been in works for weeks but was held until after last weekend’s Las Vegas Grand Prix to not overshadow the showcase event of the Liberty Media portfolio. Max Verstappen won his fourth consecutive championship in Saturday night’s race, the third and final stop in the United States for the top motorsports series in the world. Grid expansion in F1 is both infrequent and often unsuccessful. Four teams were granted entries in 2010 that should have pushed the grid to 13 teams and 26 cars for the first time since 1995. One team never made it to the grid and the other three had vanished by 2017. There is only one American team on the current F1 grid — owned by California businessman Gene Haas — but it is not particularly competitive and does not field American drivers. Andretti’s dream was to field a truly American team with American drivers. The fight to add this team has been going on for three-plus years and F1 initially denied the application despite approval from F1 sanctioning body FIA. The existing 10 teams, who have no voice in the matter, also largely opposed expansion because of the dilution in prize money and the billions of dollars they’ve already invested in the series. Andretti in 2020 tried and failed to buy the existing Sauber team. From there, he applied for grid expansion and partnered with GM, the top-selling manufacturer in the United States. The inclusion of GM was championed by the FIA and president Mohammed Ben Sulayem, who said Michael Andretti’s application was the only one of seven applicants to meet all required criteria to expand F1’s current grid. “General Motors is a huge global brand and powerhouse in the OEM world and is working with impressive partners,” Ben Sulayem said Monday. “I am fully supportive of the efforts made by the FIA, Formula 1, GM and the team to maintain dialogue and work towards this outcome of an agreement in principle to progress this application.” Despite the FIA’s acceptance of Andretti and General Motors from the start, F1 wasn’t interested in Andretti — but did want GM. At one point, F1 asked GM to find another team to partner with besides Andretti. GM refused and F1 said it would revisit the Andretti application if and when Cadillac had an engine ready to compete. Winnipeg Jets Game Days On Winnipeg Jets game days, hockey writers Mike McIntyre and Ken Wiebe send news, notes and quotes from the morning skate, as well as injury updates and lineup decisions. Arrives a few hours prior to puck drop. “Formula 1 has maintained a dialogue with General Motors, and its partners at TWG Global, regarding the viability of an entry following the commercial assessment and decision made by Formula 1 in January 2024,” F1 said in a statement. “Over the course of this year, they have achieved operational milestones and made clear their commitment to brand the 11th team GM/Cadillac, and that GM will enter as an engine supplier at a later time. Formula 1 is therefore pleased to move forward with this application process.” Yet another major shift in the debate over grid expansion occurred earlier this month with the announced resignation of Liberty Media CEO Greg Maffei, who was largely believed to be one of the biggest opponents of the Andretti entry. “With Formula 1’s continued growth plans in the US, we have always believed that welcoming an impressive US brand like GM/Cadillac to the grid and GM as a future power unit supplier could bring additional value and interest to the sport,” Maffei said. “We credit the leadership of General Motors and their partners with significant progress in their readiness to enter Formula 1.” ___ AP auto racing: https://apnews.com/hub/auto-racing Advertisement AdvertisementOur community members are treated to special offers, promotions and adverts from us and our partners. You can check out at any time. More info Auston Trusty admitted it was an angry dressing room after the final whistle on Wednesday night. But no one in the Celtic camp was raging at Cameron Carter-Vickers. The big defender held his hands up for the first half gaff that left the Hoops playing catch up against Club Brugge. Yet he didn’t need to. Carter-Vickers has more than enough credit in the bank to get off the hook for a rare boo boo. And the USA showed immense character – along with his Celtic teammates – for getting back into the game and claiming what could be a priceless point in the grand scheme of things in this new look Champions League . Trusty said: “We have his back. I don't think any defender, any player, wants that to happen to him. But, you know, sometimes it's part of football. I've had own goals as well, so it's one where you need a teammate to get your back. “So I went over to him, made sure his head was up. With all of us, he knows that we have his back.You don't want to make mistakes, but you feel fine to make mistakes, because you know your teammates have your back. “The game happened so fast, so I'm not in that position. I'm looking away, I'm also looking, I'm trying to find my next pass as well, so I have to go back and watch it. But either way, he made the decision, we have his back. “He showed his character and also the team showed its character. We bounced back and the game went on and we had plenty of life left in it.” No one was raging at Carter-Vickers – but the squad were fuming at failing to capture all three points. A draw seemed fair enough given the tough start and a difficult opening period. By the end it was Club Brugge hanging on and the Hoops felt another big win was within grasp. Trusty said: “I've been in locker rooms when you get away from this kind of game and guys are excited, but you go back in the locker room tonight and see guys p***ed off and really, really upset and that shows a lot of the character that’s in the team. “We weren't happy with how we played in the first half, but we thought that we should have won this game and it was a real opportunity for us, not just to get one point but to get three points. Obviously, you take the point, but it's good to see that guys are angry going into the locker room and sitting there just quiet.” The Celtic squad were not quiet on the pitch. In fact it took something not seen in these parts to get the side up and running again, with Kasper Schmeichel calling for an emergency huddle after the shock goal. Trusty said: “We just weren't playing in our character in the first half, so I think we all felt it. Sometimes you need that little huddle to wake everybody up and say, okay, what's happened has happened, now we can move on from it. “So that was a moment for us to make some changes and get some momentum back in the game.” Schmeichel didn’t make too much fuss about the incident but he admitted Celts needed a jolt at that point. He said: “”Probably on reflection. We weren't ourselves in the first half. “We didn't get up to the tempo of the game or play at the intensity that we know we can. “Luckily we had half-time to change that and change our press a little bit and things got better in the second half. It (the own goal) was one of those things. I am showing for Nicolas Kuhn. I think Nicolas could have passed to me. “He does well to get the pass to Cam but he is surprised by it and obviously he is getting pressed. It is so loud in here that he hasn't heard me. It is one of those things. We just move on, it happens.” It certainly happened against decent teams like Brugge and Trusty insisted Celtic are still in solid shape to qualify from the group stage with eight points from five games. He said: “That's the level we play at and that's the level of the team. “When we train, it’s the same level. We have to keep it that way because if you make a mistake, you may do something and you get punished. “Even in training, it’s just as intense as the games, if not more intense. “I think we've shown that we have the quality and we can play with any team and we back ourselves. We're confident and the team's confident. We know our ability and we've shown to you guys but also shown to ourselves that we're here. So we’re in good shape.”

Euronet Worldwide EEFT has been analyzed by 6 analysts in the last three months, revealing a diverse range of perspectives from bullish to bearish. The following table provides a quick overview of their recent ratings, highlighting the changing sentiments over the past 30 days and comparing them to the preceding months. Bullish Somewhat Bullish Indifferent Somewhat Bearish Bearish Total Ratings 3 2 1 0 0 Last 30D 0 1 0 0 0 1M Ago 0 0 0 0 0 2M Ago 2 1 1 0 0 3M Ago 1 0 0 0 0 Analysts have set 12-month price targets for Euronet Worldwide, revealing an average target of $124.5, a high estimate of $136.00, and a low estimate of $110.00. A 0.4% drop is evident in the current average compared to the previous average price target of $125.00. Investigating Analyst Ratings: An Elaborate Study The standing of Euronet Worldwide among financial experts becomes clear with a thorough analysis of recent analyst actions. The summary below outlines key analysts, their recent evaluations, and adjustments to ratings and price targets. Analyst Analyst Firm Action Taken Rating Current Price Target Prior Price Target Rayna Kumar Oppenheimer Raises Outperform $135.00 $121.00 Mayank Tandon Needham Lowers Buy $120.00 $125.00 Andrew Schmidt Citigroup Lowers Neutral $110.00 $118.00 Peter Heckmann DA Davidson Maintains Buy $136.00 $136.00 Rayna Kumar Oppenheimer Announces Outperform $121.00 - Mayank Tandon Needham Maintains Buy $125.00 $125.00 Key Insights: Action Taken: In response to dynamic market conditions and company performance, analysts update their recommendations. Whether they 'Maintain', 'Raise', or 'Lower' their stance, it signifies their reaction to recent developments related to Euronet Worldwide. This insight gives a snapshot of analysts' perspectives on the current state of the company. Rating: Analysts assign qualitative assessments to stocks, ranging from 'Outperform' to 'Underperform'. These ratings convey the analysts' expectations for the relative performance of Euronet Worldwide compared to the broader market. Price Targets: Delving into movements, analysts provide estimates for the future value of Euronet Worldwide's stock. This analysis reveals shifts in analysts' expectations over time. To gain a panoramic view of Euronet Worldwide's market performance, explore these analyst evaluations alongside essential financial indicators. Stay informed and make judicious decisions using our Ratings Table. Stay up to date on Euronet Worldwide analyst ratings. Discovering Euronet Worldwide: A Closer Look Euronet Worldwide Inc is a provider of electronic financial transaction solutions. The company operates an independent network of ATMs in Europe, along with a network for prepaid products such as mobile top-ups, and processes point-of-sale transactions. It operates in three segment EFT Processing Segment, epay Segment, and Money Transfer Segment. Its segment revenue comes from by operating income, electronical financial transaction processing, mainly generates revenue from monthly ATM management fees and currency conversion transactions. It generates the majority if its geographic revenue from the United States of America. Breaking Down Euronet Worldwide's Financial Performance Market Capitalization: With restricted market capitalization, the company is positioned below industry averages. This reflects a smaller scale relative to peers. Revenue Growth: Euronet Worldwide's remarkable performance in 3 months is evident. As of 30 September, 2024, the company achieved an impressive revenue growth rate of 9.49% . This signifies a substantial increase in the company's top-line earnings. As compared to its peers, the revenue growth lags behind its industry peers. The company achieved a growth rate lower than the average among peers in Financials sector. Net Margin: Euronet Worldwide's net margin falls below industry averages, indicating challenges in achieving strong profitability. With a net margin of 13.78%, the company may face hurdles in effective cost management. Return on Equity (ROE): Euronet Worldwide's ROE excels beyond industry benchmarks, reaching 11.77% . This signifies robust financial management and efficient use of shareholder equity capital. Return on Assets (ROA): Euronet Worldwide's ROA stands out, surpassing industry averages. With an impressive ROA of 2.45% , the company demonstrates effective utilization of assets and strong financial performance. Debt Management: The company faces challenges in debt management with a debt-to-equity ratio higher than the industry average. With a ratio of 1.78 , caution is advised due to increased financial risk. Understanding the Relevance of Analyst Ratings Within the domain of banking and financial systems, analysts specialize in reporting for specific stocks or defined sectors. Their work involves attending company conference calls and meetings, researching company financial statements, and communicating with insiders to publish "analyst ratings" for stocks. Analysts typically assess and rate each stock once per quarter. Some analysts also offer predictions for helpful metrics such as earnings, revenue, and growth estimates to provide further guidance as to what to do with certain tickers. It is important to keep in mind that while stock and sector analysts are specialists, they are also human and can only forecast their beliefs to traders. Which Stocks Are Analysts Recommending Now? Benzinga Edge gives you instant access to all major analyst upgrades, downgrades, and price targets. Sort by accuracy, upside potential, and more. Click here to stay ahead of the market . This article was generated by Benzinga's automated content engine and reviewed by an editor. © 2024 Benzinga.com. Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.Is Enron back? If it's a joke, some former employees aren't laughingStaff report ANDERSON, S.C. — It was a strange Wednesday night for Catawba’s men’s basketball team at the Abney Center. Leading scorer Kris Robinson made only one field goal, but Catawba got a career game — 21 points — from reserve forward Zion McDuffie and had a chance to win its South Atlantic Conference opener on the road. Catawba (2-2, 0-1) just didn’t shoot well enough to win it, however, and Anderson (4-0, 1-0) overcame an eight-point halftime deficit to take a 76-71 victory. The Trojans hadn’t beaten Catawba in a number of years. Catawba held a whopping 26-13 advantage in the turnover battle, but Catawba shot 38 percent while Anderson shot 58 percent. Anderson also had the edge in the intimidation factor, out-blocking the Indians 9-0. Catawba is on the road agains on Saturday at Carson-Newman. Catawba 37 34 — 71 Anderson 29 47 — 76 CATAWBA scoring — McDuffie 21, Banks 10, Walker 7, Tinsley 7, Achie 6, K. Robinson 5, White 4, Hawkins 4, Chase Daniel 3, Jones 2, Thomas 2.

Smith, in a filing with the judge in Washington presiding over the historic case, said it should be dropped in light of a long-standing Justice Department policy not to prosecute a sitting president. The special counsel asked District Judge Tanya Chutkan to dismiss the case "without prejudice" -- leaving open the possibility it could be revived after Trump leaves office four years from now. Smith paused the election interference case earlier this month after Trump defeated Kamala Harris in the November 5 presidential election. "The Government's position on the merits of the defendant's prosecution has not changed," Smith said in the filing with Chutkan. "But the circumstances have." "It has long been the position of the Department of Justice that the United States Constitution forbids the federal indictment and subsequent criminal prosecution of a sitting President," Smith said. "As a result this prosecution must be dismissed before the defendant is inaugurated." Trump's communications director Steven Cheung welcomed the move to dismiss the case, calling it a "major victory for the rule of law." "The American People and President Trump want an immediate end to the political weaponization of our justice system and we look forward to uniting our country," Cheung said in a statement. Trump is accused of conspiracy to defraud the United States and conspiracy to obstruct an official proceeding -- the session of Congress called to certify Biden's win, which was violently attacked on January 6, 2021, by a mob of the then-president's supporters. Trump is also accused of seeking to disenfranchise US voters with his false claims that he won the 2020 election. Smith charged Trump with mishandling top secret documents after leaving the White House, but that case was tossed out by a federal judge in Florida, a Trump appointee, on the grounds that Smith was unlawfully appointed. Smith had appealed that dismissal but is now expected to drop the appeal. Trump also faces two state cases -- in New York and Georgia. He was convicted in New York in May of 34 counts of falsifying business records to cover up a hush money payment to porn star Stormy Daniels on the eve of the 2016 election to stop her from revealing an alleged 2006 sexual encounter. Judge Juan Merchan has postponed sentencing while he considers a request from Trump's lawyers that the conviction be thrown out in light of the Supreme Court ruling in July that an ex-president has broad immunity from prosecution. In Georgia, Trump faces racketeering charges over his efforts to subvert the 2020 election results in the southern state, but that case will likely be frozen while he is in office under the policy of not prosecuting a sitting president. cl/bgs

Carlos Michael Morales: 'What really hurts at Cuban prisons is the hunger'

With more than half of the 16 teams still mathematically alive to make the conference championship game, the Big 12 will command a lot of attention in the final week of the regular season. No. 14 Arizona State and No. 17 Iowa State would play for the Big 12 title and likely College Football Playoff spot on Dec. 7 if they both win Saturday and there's a four-way tie for first place. There are seven other teams that begin this week with hopes, slim in most cases, of getting into the game at AT&T Stadium in Arlington, Texas. Last week it was No. 19 BYU and No. 23 Colorado that had the inside track to the championship game. Arizona State beat the Cougars and Kansas knocked off the Buffaloes, and here we are. "Everybody counted us out, I think, two weeks ago," Iowa State coach Matt Campbell said after his team beat Utah 31-28. "We didn't flinch. We didn't waver. And we just keep fighting." The Cyclones were national darlings the first half of the season as they won seven straight games to match the best start in program history. Back-to-back losses to Texas Tech and Kansas followed. Now they've won two straight heading into "Farmageddon," their rivalry game against Kansas State at home. "Right now they've got the pen and they continue to write the story," Campbell said of his players, "and I hope they will continue to write it the way they've got the ability to write it. Unwavering. Tough, mentally tough, physically tough. This group has stood for it every step of the way." Arizona State has been an even better story than the Cyclones. The Sun Devils have six more wins than they did last season, when they went 3-9. They were picked to finish last in their first year in the Big 12. They'll go for their fifth straight victory when they play at Arizona on Saturday. "These guys came off no momentum and everybody doubting them, and everybody is still doubting them. That's what makes this special," second-year coach Kenny Dillingham said. "Hopefully the expectations become higher. I don't know if there's a way we can exceed expectations more than we're exceeding them right now." Checking in on five of the Top 25: The Ducks were idle Saturday after clinching a spot in the Big Ten championship game with their win at Wisconsin on Nov. 16. Oregon can go 12-0 in the regular season for the first time since 2010 if it beats Washington at home this week. Oregon's only two losses last season came against the Huskies, both decided by three points. The first was a top-10 matchup in the regular season and the second was a top-five matchup in the Pac-12 championship game. The Ducks are 19 1/2-point favorites this time, according to BetMGM Sportsbook. The Buckeyes' showdown with upstart Indiana combined with Michigan's dropoff after winning the national championship have lowered the volume on this week's meeting with the Wolverines at the Horseshoe. If Michigan beats Ohio State a fourth straight time and it keeps the Buckeyes out of the Big Ten championship game and playoff ... well, there'll be lots of noise in Columbus then. The Lone Star Showdown returns to the gridiron for the first time since 2011, when Texas and Texas A&M were in the Big 12. The Longhorns head to No. 20 Texas A&M on a four-game win streak. The Aggies have lost two of three after Saturday's four-overtime loss at Auburn. The winner advances to the Southeastern Conference championship game against Georgia. The Broncos are tied with Notre Dame for the second-longest active win streak, at nine games, and they seem to have adopted a survive-and-advance mantra. They trailed 23-point underdog Wyoming in the fourth quarter before winning 17-13 and clinching a spot in the Mountain West championship game. They won their previous game, 42-21 against San Jose State, but didn't pull away until the fourth quarter. Two weeks ago they beat a three-win Nevada team 28-21. Just when you think Illinois is about to cash in for the season, they do what they did against Rutgers. The Illini were down 31-30 when they lined up for a 58-yard field goal with 14 seconds left. Ethan Moczulski missed. But wait. Rutgers called timeout before the snap, and Bret Bielema thought better of trying another kick and sent his offense back on the field. Luke Altmyer passed to Pat Bryant for the winning 40-yard touchdown. The Illini won't play for the Big Ten title, but they have a chance for nine wins and a nice bowl. Ohio State played in three of the five regular-season top-five matchups and won three of them. The Buckeyes lost to Oregon and beat Penn State and Indiana. ... Kansas' 37-21 win over Colorado made the Jayhawks the first FBS team with a losing record to beat three straight Top 25 opponents. The Jayhawks, who were 2-6 a month ago, will be bowl eligible if they win at Baylor. ... Nebraska ended the longest power conference bowl drought with its 44-25 win over Wisconsin. The Cornhuskers haven't played in a bowl since 2016. Be the first to know Get local news delivered to your inbox!

None

A new study by the firm Kickresume surveyed 1,250 random U.S. LinkedIn profiles to find out how many U.S. citizens would rather switch companies or wait for promotion. The method of randomised sampling has not been specified. However, the study found out that 58 percent of people are more likely to change jobs than to wait for promotion. This issue of deciding between switching companies or pursuing a promotion is something that many people have considered throughout their careers . How likely is an internal promotion? Kickresume found that only 17 percent of people were promoted by their current employer in the last 5 years. With others, over half (58 percent) switched employers to pursue new roles in the same timeframe. Out of those who got promoted, they spent an average time of two years and 4 months waiting for their next step on the career ladder. Those who switched employers did so an average of 3.7 times in a five year period, which equates to once every 1 year and 5 months. While a possible path to success, this represents a frequent number of job changes and could signal a commitment problem to prospective employers. The survey also found a degree of fluidity in the employment area with 65 percent of workers ending up changing roles, whether through an internal promotion or switching to another company. Stay or leave? Kickresume found that there was a significant difference in the amount of people who were promoted compared to those who changed employers instead. The data shows that changing jobs is the more likely career decision across all U.S. regions. Martin Poduška at Kickresume has told Digital Journal: “There have always been two paths to progress in a career—you either get promoted or start looking for a new job. However, our new survey suggests that for workers in today’s United States, only one of those paths seems to remain open. Promotions are rarer than people think.” This is due to: “Factors such as at-will employment, the structure of the corporate ladder, and recent economic hiccups all contribute to the trend of increased job switching. It has proven to be easier than to wait for a promotion and offers greater opportunities for growth, at least speaking in the context of the USA.” He adds some advice for those caught in the middle: If the promotion’s out of your reach, switching jobs may be the best way to progress in your career. However, it’s always wise to discuss potential advancements with the manager or HR before making the big decision.” The Midwest has the highest number of people who were promoted 27 percent of citizens located in the Midwest earned a promotion in the past 5 years, which is the highest percentage out of all the US regions. The Midwest was followed closely by both the South and West, in both US regions, 26 percent of people earned a promotion in the past 5 years. In last place is the Northeast, with just 24 percent of Americans that received a promotion. Dr. Tim Sandle is Digital Journal's Editor-at-Large for science news.Tim specializes in science, technology, environmental, business, and health journalism. He is additionally a practising microbiologist; and an author. He is also interested in history, politics and current affairs.ITV I'm A Celebrity fans 'feel for' Tulisa Contostavlos as they accuse show of 'set up'

Is Enron back? If it's a joke, some former employees aren't laughing

TORONTO , Dec. 3, 2024 /PRNewswire/ - IsoEnergy Ltd. (" IsoEnergy ") (TSX: ISO) (OTCQX: ISENF ) is pleased to announce shareholders of the company (the " Shareholders ") have overwhelmingly approved two resolutions at the Special Meeting of Shareholders (the " Meeting ") held today. These include the ordinary resolution (the " Share Issuance Resolution ") to approve the share issuance in connection with the previously announced arrangement (the " Arrangement ") involving IsoEnergy and Anfield Energy Corp. (" Anfield ") and the special resolution (the " Share Consolidation Resolution ") approving the discretionary consolidation of IsoEnergy shares. The Share Issuance Resolution was required to be approved by a simple majority of the votes cast by Shareholders virtually in person or represented by proxy at the Meeting and the Share Consolidation Resolution was required to be approved by at least two-thirds (66 2/3%) of the votes cast by Shareholders virtually in person or represented by proxy at the Meeting. A total of 116,633,626 Common Shares, representing approximately 65.23% of votes entitled to be cast at the Meeting, were represented in person or by proxy at the Meeting. Approximately 99.56% of the votes eligible to be cast were voted in favour of the Share Issuance Resolution and 99.19% in favour of the Share Consolidation Resolution. The report of voting results will be made available under IsoEnergy's profile on SEDAR+ at www.sedarplus.ca . In addition to the approval by IsoEnergy Shareholders, Anfield shareholders approved the Arrangement at its special meeting today. Anfield will seek a final order approving the Arrangement from the Supreme Court of British Columbia on December 6, 2024 . Closing of the Arrangement remains subject to satisfaction of certain customary closing conditions, including receipt of final court and stock exchange approvals. Subject to the satisfaction of these closing conditions, the parties currently expect to complete the Arrangement in December 2024 . IsoEnergy is also pleased to announce that the parties have received written notice from the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States that it has concluded its review of the Arrangement and determined that there are no unresolved national security concerns with respect to the Arrangement. Further details regarding the Arrangement, including the principal closing conditions and the anticipated benefits for Shareholders, can be found in the Company's management proxy circular dated October 31, 2024 , in respect of the Meeting, which can be found under the Company's SEDAR+ profile at www.sedarplus.ca . None of the securities to be issued pursuant to the Arrangement have been or will be registered under the United States Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "U.S. Securities Act"), or any state securities laws, and any securities issuable in the Arrangement are anticipated to be issued in reliance upon available exemptions from such registration requirements pursuant to Section 3(a)(10) of the U.S. Securities Act and applicable exemptions under state securities laws. This press release does not constitute an offer to sell, or the solicitation of an offer to buy, any securities. Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information This press release contains "forward-looking information" within the meaning of applicable Canadian securities legislation. Generally, forward-looking information can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as "plans", "expects" or "does not expect", "is expected", "budget", "scheduled", "estimates", "forecasts", "intends", "anticipates" or "does not anticipate", or "believes", or variations of such words and phrases or state that certain actions, events or results "may", "could", "would", "might" or "will be taken", "occur" or "be achieved". These forward-looking statements or information may relate to the Arrangement, including statements with respect to the consummation of the Arrangement and the timing thereof; satisfaction of conditions to closing of the Arrangement, including receipt of final court and stock exchange approvals; and any other activities, events or developments that the companies expect or anticipate will or may occur in the future. Forward-looking statements are necessarily based upon a number of assumptions that, while considered reasonable by management at the time, are inherently subject to business, market and economic risks, uncertainties and contingencies that may cause actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from those expressed or implied by forward-looking statements. Such assumptions include, but are not limited to, assumptions that IsoEnergy and Anfield will complete the Arrangement in accordance with, and on the timeline contemplated by the terms and conditions of the relevant agreements; that the parties will receive the required court and stock exchange approvals and will satisfy, in a timely manner, the other conditions to the closing of the Arrangement; and that general business and economic conditions will not change in a material adverse manner . Although IsoEnergy has attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in forward-looking information, there may be other factors that cause results not to be as anticipated, estimated or intended. There can be no assurance that such information will prove to be accurate, as actual results and future events could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements. Accordingly, readers should not place undue reliance on forward-looking information. Such statements represent the current views of IsoEnergy with respect to future events and are necessarily based upon a number of assumptions and estimates that, while considered reasonable by IsoEnergy, are inherently subject to significant business, economic, competitive, political and social risks, contingencies and uncertainties. Risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to the following: the inability of IsoEnergy and Anfield to complete the Arrangement; a material adverse change in the timing of and the terms and conditions upon which the Arrangemen tis completed; the inability to satisfy or waive all conditions to closing the Arrangement; the failure to obtain shareholder, regulatory, court or stock exchange approvals in connection with the Arrangement; unanticipated changes in market price for IsoEnergy Shares and/or Anfield shares; changes to IsoEnergy's and/or Anfield's current and future business plans and the strategic alternatives available thereto; growth prospects and outlook of Anfield's business; regulatory determinations and delays; stock market conditions generally; demand, supply and pricing for uranium; and general economic and political conditions in Canada , the United States and other jurisdictions where the applicable party conducts business. Other factors which could materially affect such forward-looking information are described in the risk factors in IsoEnergy's most recent annual information form, the Circular and IsoEnergy's other filings with the Canadian securities regulators which are available, respectively, on each company's profile on SEDAR+ at www.sedarplus.ca . IsoEnergy does not undertake to update any forward-looking information, except in accordance with applicable securities laws. SOURCE IsoEnergy Ltd.