slotvip tech
One Nation One Election: ‘It Should Not Be Similar To What Happened With Article 370 In 2019’NoneBoxing Day Test LIVE updates: Series on the line as Aussies chase wickets as day three begins against India
Mikel Arteta insists Arsenal will need time to adapt without Bukayo Saka after their win over Ipswich - as the Gunners boss reveals the forward could be out for 'more than two months'NEW YORK , Dec. 27, 2024 /PRNewswire/ -- Pomerantz LLP is investigating claims on behalf of investors of Neurogene Inc. ("Neurogene" or the "Company") (NASDAQ: NGNE ). Such investors are advised to contact Danielle Peyton at [email protected] or 646-581-9980, ext. 7980. The investigation concerns whether Neurogene and certain of its officers and/or directors have engaged in securities fraud or other unlawful business practices. [Click here for information about joining the class action] On November 11, 2024 , Neurogene issued a press release reporting "interim clinical data in the first four participants in the low-dose cohort of its ongoing Phase 1/2 open-label trial designed to evaluate NGN-401 gene therapy for the treatment of female pediatric patients with Rett syndrome." Although Neurogene characterized the data as "positive", one of two patients given a high dose reported an emerging treatment-related serious adverse event that the Company described as "consistent with known risks of [adeno-associated virus] gene therapy[.]" On this news, Neurogene's stock price fell $31.53 per share, or 44.08%, to close at $40.00 per share on November 12 , 2024. Then, on November 18, 2024 , Neurogene issued a press release providing an updating, stating that the patient in question "is in critical condition" and that "Neurogene no longer anticipates completing enrollment in the 1E15 vg cohort (low-dose cohort) of NGN-401 in the fourth quarter of 2024". On this news, Neurogene's stock price fell sharply during intraday trading on November 18, 2024 . The Pomerantz Firm, with offices in New York , Chicago , Los Angeles , London , and Paris is acknowledged as one of the premier firms in the areas of corporate, securities, and antitrust class litigation. Founded by the late Abraham L. Pomerantz , known as the dean of the class action bar, the Pomerantz Firm pioneered the field of securities class actions. Today, more than 85 years later, the Pomerantz Firm continues in the tradition he established, fighting for the rights of the victims of securities fraud , breaches of fiduciary duty, and corporate misconduct. The Firm has recovered numerous multimillion-dollar damages awards on behalf of class members. See www.pomerantzlaw.com . Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee similar outcomes. CONTACT: Danielle Peyton Pomerantz LLP [email protected] 646-581-9980 ext. 7980 SOURCE Pomerantz LLPAI seen as an asset to teaching in suburban Chicago high school
Overachievers collide when Georgia Tech, Vandy play in BirminghamIt has become somewhat trite to comment on the fact that the threat landscape has become increasingly hostile over recent years but 2024 acted as a reminder that attackers continue to become more refined and brutal, with real world consequences. This year we saw hackers cause carnage at a wide range of organizations, from healthcare, telecoms, technology, industries as well as the public sector. Collected below is a roundup of the biggest cyber scares we saw over the course of this year. Change Healthcare attack causes chaos across US medical facilities (Image credit: Getty Images) The year got off to a somewhat rocky start in February when Change Healthcare, a key provider of payment technologies to the healthcare industry was hit by a cyberattack that crippled its services. On 21 February Change Healthcare, a subsidiary of the US's largest health insurer UnitedHealth Group posted a notice stating that it had suffered a ransomware attack that forced it to take its systems offline. The breach meant medical facilities reliant on the technology provided by Change Healthcare could not process electronic payments, medical claims, or drug prescriptions, causing chaos across the US. The firms confirmed that a "substantial quantity of data" had been exfiltrated from its environment between 17 and 20 February. In June this year, we learned that the stolen information included sensitive information covering patients' health, their insurance, financials, as well as other PII such as their social security numbers, driver's licenses, state ID numbers, and passport numbers. Get the ITPro. daily newsletter Receive our latest news, industry updates, featured resources and more. Sign up today to receive our FREE report on AI cyber crime & security - newly updated for 2024. Contact me with news and offers from other Future brands Receive email from us on behalf of our trusted partners or sponsors It is believed the attack was carried out by the notorious ALPHV/BlackCat... Solomon Klappholz
With $1000 in This Dogecoin (DOGE) and Ripple (XRP) Alternative, You Could Hit $1M By 2026By HALELUYA HADERO, Associated Press President-elect Donald Trump asked the Supreme Court on Friday to pause the potential TikTok ban from going into effect until his administration can pursue a “political resolution” to the issue. The request came as TikTok and the Biden administration filed opposing briefs to the court, in which the company argued the court should strike down a law that could ban the platform by Jan. 19 while the government emphasized its position that the statute is needed to eliminate a national security risk. “President Trump takes no position on the underlying merits of this dispute. Instead, he respectfully requests that the Court consider staying the Act’s deadline for divestment of January 19, 2025, while it considers the merits of this case,” said Trump’s amicus brief, which supported neither party in the case. The filings come ahead of oral arguments scheduled for Jan. 10 on whether the law, which requires TikTok to divest from its China-based parent company or face a ban, unlawfully restricts speech in violation of the First Amendment. Earlier this month, a panel of three federal judges on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit unanimously upheld the statute , leading TikTok to appeal the case to the Supreme Court. The brief from Trump said he opposes banning TikTok at this junction and “seeks the ability to resolve the issues at hand through political means once he takes office.”PIAA football: Southern Lehigh, Northwestern Lehigh playoff games moved to Saturday due to snow
Ceribell to Participate in the 43rd Annual J.P. Morgan Healthcare Conference