online games y city

The former Labour PM said the death of his newborn daughter in 2002 did “not convince me of the case for assisted dying; it convinced me of the value and imperative of good end-of-life care”. In a rare intervention ahead of the Commons debate on the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill on Friday, November 29, Mr Brown shared a glimpse of the time he and his wife Sarah spent with their baby, Jennifer, who died when she was only 11 days old. Writing in the Guardian newspaper, Mr Brown said: “We could only sit with her, hold her tiny hand and be there for her as life ebbed away. She died in our arms. “But those days we spent with her remain among the most precious days of my and Sarah’s lives.” While he acknowledged that at the heart of the assisted dying debate is a “desire to prevent suffering”, the former Labour MP called for a commission on end-of-life care to be set up, instead of the law change which MPs will consider. This commission, he said, should work to create a “fully-funded, 10-year strategy for improved and comprehensive palliative care”. “When only a small fraction of the population are expected to choose assisted dying, would it not be better to focus all our energies on improving all-round hospice care to reach everyone in need of end of life support?” he said. Mr Brown added: “Medical advances that can transform end-of-life care and the horror of people dying alone, as with Covid, have taught us a great deal. “This generation have it in our power to ensure no-one should have to face death alone, uncared for, or subject to avoidable pain.” Kim Leadbeater, the Labour MP sponsoring the assisted dying Bill through the Commons, said she was “deeply touched” by Mr Brown’s decision to share his story. The Spen Valley MP said she agreed completely with his calls for better end-of-life care. But Ms Leadbeater added: “He and I agree on very many things but we don’t agree on this. “Only legislation by Parliament can put right what Sir Keir Starmer calls the ‘injustice that we have trapped within our current arrangement’. “The need to address the inability of the current law to provide people with safeguards against coercion and the choice of a better death, and to protect their loved ones from possible prosecution, cannot wait. “So for me it isn’t a case of one or the other. My Bill already includes the need for the Government to report back to Parliament on the availability and quality of palliative care, and I strongly support further detailed examination of its provision. We need to do both.” Though Ms Leadbeater made reference to the Prime Minister as she set out her difference from Mr Brown’s position, Sir Keir has opted not to say whether he will support the Bill. MPs will be given a free vote on the legislation, meaning their political parties will not require them to vote for or against it, and it will be a matter for their personal consideration. Home Secretary Yvette Cooper is the latest senior minister to disclose her position on assisted dying, signalling to broadcasters on Friday that she may support the Bill. “I continue to support the principle of needing change but also to ensure that we’ve got the proper safeguards and systems in place,” she told ITV’s Good Morning Britain. Asked if that meant a “yes” when the Bill comes to the Commons, she replied: “I think I last voted on this about 20 years ago and so I have supported the principle in the past and continue to believe that change is needed but we do need to have that debate on the detail and I’ll continue to follow that debate next Friday.”

NoneWe're Not Worried About Rapport Therapeutics' (NASDAQ:RAPP) Cash Burn

Good news and bad news from 30–7 loss to the BuccaneersHM Shah Stresses On Mapping Of Demographic Data Of People Along India-Myanmar Border

JUNIOR Peps from the Western Highlands has claimed the championship for the 2024 Highlands Confederate tournament after defeating Western Panthers from the Eastern Highlands 18-12 at the Baning Rugby League ground in Kudjip, Jiwaka, yesterday. The team from Mt Hagen, who will represent the Highlands region, is now on standby to participate in the national championships which will be held in Lae on November 30. Co-ordinator for Highlands Confederation Joe Tokam acknowledged all club champion teams in all affiliated rugby leagues in the highlands region for taking part in the two-day tournament. Chief executive officer for PNGRFL Stanley Hondina while officiating at the games thanked all participating teams for this year and described the tournament as a way forward because it is creating a pathway for rugby league development and also marketing players for Digicel ExxonMobil Cup franchise scouts to recruit potential players. “ Rugby has now become a multi-million industry and the onus is on us leaders to create pathways for our youths,” he said. Mr Hondina further said the National Government has already thrown its support to push PNG to have a team in Australia’s National Rugby League, thus, it’s about time youths must be serious in playing rugby. The four teams that participated in the tournament are Prum Panthers from Enga, Western Panthers from the Eastern Highlands, Junior Peps from the Western Highlands and Mt Knights from Jiwaka.

In a recent blog post, Mary Trump warned about the alleged influence of Russian President Vladimir Putin on her uncle, President-elect Donald Trump . What Happened : Mary Trump expressed her apprehensions about her uncle’s admiration for Putin, suggesting it could negatively impact U.S. support for Ukraine amidst the ongoing Russian invasion. She called Trump “Putin’s puppet” and cautioned that his actions could leave Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in a vulnerable position. In her post , Mary Trump also criticized her uncle’s admiration for Elon Musk , alleging that Musk has been in regular contact with Putin since 2022. “Of all the unthinkable scenarios we’ve been forced to consider since Donald won the election on November 5th is the possibility that all of this will have been for nought,” Mary Trump wrote. “After all, the fate of Ukraine and Zelensky may rest with Donald Trump, Putin’s puppet, a man who is enamored of and beholden to the very autocrat who wants to destroy our ally.” Also Read: Mary Trump Warns of ‘Tyranny’ and ‘Fascism’ Following Uncle’s Victory Meanwhile, Zelensky warned this week that Ukraine could lose the war if the U.S. cuts military aid. His comments followed the Biden administration’s announcement of a new $275 million military aid package for Ukraine. Zelensky acknowledged the potential influence Donald Trump could have on ending the war, stating, “Yes, he can,” but said it would not be simple. He emphasized the importance of maintaining unity between Ukraine, Europe, and the United States, warning that a loss of this unity could have dangerous consequences. Why It Matters : The allegations by Mary Trump underscore the complex and potentially precarious relationship between the U.S., Russia, and Ukraine. The influence of Putin on Donald Trump, if true, could significantly alter U.S. foreign policy and its stance towards the ongoing conflict in Ukraine. Furthermore, the alleged contact between Elon Musk and Putin raises questions about the role of private sector leaders in international politics. This situation warrants close observation as it unfolds, given its potential to reshape geopolitical dynamics. Read Next Mary Trump On Trump's Lack Of Empathy: ‘Why Is It That The More Awful Things Donald Does, The Less It Seems To Matter?' This content was partially produced with the help of Benzinga Neuro and was reviewed and published by Benzinga editors. © 2024 Benzinga.com. Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved.

Only Tinubu, council of states can sack INEC chairman -ex- gov. IkpeazuWASHINGTON (AP) — President-elect Donald Trump’s allies on Capitol Hill rallied around Pete Hegseth, Trump’s Pentagon pick, on Thursday even as new details surfaced about allegations that he had sexually assaulted a woman in 2017. The GOP embrace of Hegseth came as another controversial Trump nominee, Matt Gaetz, withdrew from consideration for attorney general. Gaetz said it was clear he had become a “distraction" amid pressure on the House to release an ethics report about allegations of his own sexual misconduct. An attorney for two women has said that his clients told House Ethics Committee investigators that Gaetz paid them for sex on multiple occasions beginning in 2017, when Gaetz was a Florida congressman. People are also reading... Fresh questions over the two nominees' pasts, and their treatment of women, arose with Republicans under pressure from Trump and his allies to quickly confirm his Cabinet. At the same time, his transition has so far balked at the vetting and background checks that have traditionally been required. While few Republican senators have publicly criticized any of Trump's nominees, it became clear after Gaetz's withdrawal that many had been harboring private concerns about him. Oklahoma Sen. Markwayne Mullin, who served with Gaetz in the House, said it was a “positive move.” Mississippi Sen. Roger Wicker said it was a “positive development.” Maine Sen. Susan Collins said Gaetz “put country first and I am pleased with his decision.” After meeting with Hegseth, though, Republicans rallied around him. “I think he’s going to be in pretty good shape,” said Wicker, who is expected to chair the Senate Armed Services Committee in the next Congress. Republican senators' careful words, and their early reluctance to publicly question Trump's picks, illustrated not only their fear of retribution from the incoming president but also some of their hopes that the confirmation process can proceed normally, with proper vetting and background checks that could potentially disqualify problematic nominees earlier. Gaetz withdrew after meeting with senators on Wednesday. Sen. Thom Tillis said Gaetz was “in a pressure cooker” when he decided to withdraw, but suggested that it would have little bearing on Trump’s other nominees. “Transactions — one at a time,” he said. As the Hegseth nomination proceeds, Republicans also appear to be betting that they won't face much backlash for publicly setting aside the allegations of sexual misconduct — especially after Trump won election after being found liable for sexual abuse last year. Hegseth held a round of private meetings alongside incoming Vice President JD Vance on Thursday in an attempt to shore up support and told reporters afterward: “The matter was fully investigated and I was completely cleared, and that’s where I’m gonna leave it.” A 22-page police report report made public late Wednesday offered the first detailed account of the allegations against him. A woman told police that she was sexually assaulted in 2017 by Hegseth after he took her phone, blocked the door to a California hotel room and refused to let her leave. The report cited police interviews with the alleged victim, a nurse who treated her, a hotel staffer, another woman at the event and Hegseth. Listen now and subscribe: Apple Podcasts | Spotify | RSS Feed | SoundStack | All Of Our Podcasts Hegseth’s lawyer, Timothy Palatore, said the incident was “fully investigated and police found the allegations to be false.” Hegseth paid the woman in 2023 as part of a confidential settlement to head off the threat of what he described as a baseless lawsuit, Palatore has said. Wicker played down the allegations against Hegseth, a former Fox News host, saying that “since no charges were brought from the authorities, we only have press reports.” Sen. Bill Hagerty, R-Tenn., said after his meeting with Hegseth that he "shared with him the fact that I was saddened by the attacks that are coming his way.” Hagerty dismissed the allegations as “a he-said, she-said thing” and called it a “shame” that they were being raised at all. The senator said attention should instead be focused on the Defense Department that Hegseth would head. It's one of the most complex parts of the federal government with more than 3 million employees, including military service members and civilians. Sexual assault has been a persistent problem in the military, though Pentagon officials have been cautiously optimistic they are seeing a decline in reported sexual assaults among active-duty service members and the military academies. Wyoming Sen. John Barrasso, who will be the No. 2 Republican in the Senate next year, said after his meeting with Hegseth that the nominee is a strong candidate who “pledged that the Pentagon will focus on strength and hard power – not the current administration’s woke political agenda.” Senate Republicans are under pressure to hold hearings once they take office in January and confirm nominees as soon as Trump is inaugurated, despite questions about whether Trump’s choices will be properly screened or if some, like Hegseth, have enough experience for the job. Senate Armed Services Chairman Jack Reed, who will be the top Democrat on the panel next year, said the reports on Hegseth “emphasized the need for a thorough investigation by the FBI on the background of all the nominees.” It takes a simple majority to approve Cabinet nominations, meaning that if Democrats all opposed a nominee, four Republican senators would also have to defect for any Trump choice to be defeated. Trump has made clear he’s willing to put maximum pressure on Senate Republicans to give him the nominees he wants – even suggesting at one point that they allow him to just appoint his nominees with no Senate votes. But senators insist, for now, that they are not giving up their constitutional power to have a say. “The president has the right to make the nominations that he sees fit, but the Senate also has a responsibility for advice and consent,” said Republican Sen. Mike Rounds of South Dakota. In the case of Gaetz, he said, “I think there was advice offered rather than consent.” Get Government & Politics updates in your inbox!

This Timberwolves roster is different than the one from a year ago. That much is obvious in games, as Karl-Anthony Towns’ consistent scoring and general size is missed, as is the playmaking and ball security of guys like Kyle Anderson and Jordan McLaughlin. But their absences have been felt in the locker room, as well. Towns was a consistent source of positivity for the team. Anderson was one of the loudest vocal leaders. The latter can be especially difficult to replace, especially because it can be uncomfortable to speak up when things are going poorly and something needs to change. That was the position Anthony Edwards has found himself in early this season. Edwards has been praised for his leadership through his first four years on Minnesota’s roster. Mostly, that all came via positivity and example. Edwards can be coached hard, which gave the greenlight for the coaches to treat everyone else the same way. Edwards was also quick to credit his teammates around him for their contributions to the cause, and was eager and willing to spend time with and talk to anyone on the roster, players No. 1-15. He’ll also stand up for any of his teammates if the occasion ever arises. That’s why he has been so beloved in the locker room and why he was viewed as such a leader, even at his young age. But with Anderson’s departure, Edwards was now tasked with leading even through choppy waters. And the waves have been rather large through the first quarter of the season. Minnesota’s defense has fallen off a cliff in comparison to where it was a year ago. After never even as many as three consecutive games during the 2023-24 regular season, the Wolves endured a four-game losing skid earlier this week. At that point, words were exchanged, both publicly and privately. A halftime hash out during Minnesota’s loss Wednesday to Sacramento got the conversation rolling. Mike Conley got the dialogue started, but all indications are that Edwards was a healthy participant. Edwards noted it’s difficult to know what to say in those times. “Because you look at everybody, and everybody got a different agenda. It’s like, ‘What the (heck) am I supposed to say?’ You know what I mean?” Edwards said. “I’m trying to get better in that aspect, figure out what the hell to say to get everybody on the same agenda, because everybody right now is on different agendas. I think that’s one of the main culprits of why we’re losing, because everybody out there got their own agenda. I guess their imagination of what’s supposed to be going on, and what’s really happening.” Nickeil Alexander-Walker told reporters at Friday’s shootaround that this is the most vocal Edwards has ever been. And while the intention of everyone’s messages are pure, “sometimes it’s not always worded the right way.” “I think we’ve crossed that line of, ‘Man, I feel like you’re not hearing the message.’ It’s tough to be called out, because you start to feel like, ‘OK, are you saying I’m the reason?’ No one wants to be at fault,” Alexander-Walker said. “But at the end of the day, I definitely think that guys are open to hearing it better. And I think it just came from a stand point of, at a point and time in the conversation, there was a comeback. It was going back and forth now, as opposed to receiving it (and saying), ‘OK, I got you.’ That’s how it’s going to be. It’s very rare that someone is just going to be able to be called out and not have anything to say. “It’s human nature to be defensive, at the end of the day. But kind of remembering what we’re here for, and if I’m being called out, chances are I’ve got to look in the mirror and be better.” It’s a delicate dance. There has to be an environment rooted in accountability, but you also have to be sure not to lose teammates, as Jimmy Butler was criticized for doing during his short stint in Minnesota a few years ago. And while it’s never ideal for a team to be living through a stretch of basketball the quality of which falls significantly short of the expectation, these stretches will likely lead to growth for Edwards, if not on the court, then in the locker room. You can’t steer a ship to a title if you don’t know how to navigate turbulent tides. Day by day, loss by loss, Edwards is learning how to spin the wheel.Utah Falls to No. 22 Iowa State in Seventh Straight Loss This Season

he world faces a perfect storm of crises, many of which can seem intractable. The impacts of are becoming more obvious by the day, including injuries and deaths from storms, flooding, and wildfires. The Middle East, central Europe, and Africa, among other regions, are embroiled in deadly and destabilizing wars. We have just been through a pandemic that caused an estimated , and we remain in an era in which there will be a constant risk of more epidemics and pandemics. Yet despite these challenges, we remain profoundly optimistic when it comes to tackling disease and improving human health worldwide. We are no Pollyannas. Our optimism is based on a report recently published in the that we coauthored as members of a team of 50 health experts and economists worldwide, the , chaired by former U.S. Treasury Secretary Lawrence Summers. Our report, called , shows that a remarkable goal is within reach: any country that chooses to do so, regardless of how wealthy it is, could halve the probability of their citizens dying before age 70 by the year 2050. We call this goal “50 by 50”—a 50% reduction in the probability of premature death by 2050, starting from a baseline year of 2019 (the year before the COVID-19 pandemic). : Although we concluded that “50 by 50” is an achievable goal for all countries, recent history suggests that some countries would require major redirections of policy. The U.S., for example, is the only country among the world’s 30 most populous countries to have experienced an actual in the probability of premature death in the decade preceding COVID-19. Achieving “50 by 50” in the U.S. would require far more dramatic improvements in policy than for recently successful populous countries like South Korea, Russia, Bangladesh, and Turkey. Why do we focus on premature death? Because dying prematurely is ruinous—not just for the individual, but for their families and communities. Premature death takes a human toll as well as an economic one on households and societies, striking down wage earners in the prime of their lives. And it can be averted. To quote the legendary British epidemiologist Richard Doll, who pioneered research showing that smoking caused lung cancer, “In old age death is inevitable, but death before old age is not.” (Doll lived to age 92.) For any country, reaching “50 by 50” would be transformative. It would mean more children surviving into adulthood, more women surviving childbirth, and fewer people dying in middle age from illnesses and injuries that are preventable and treatable. Our optimism that “50 by 50” can be achieved is based both on looking back to historical experience of mortality decline and on looking forward to the new scientific innovations coming out of the research and development pipeline. Historical experience shows that our goal is challenging but feasible. Since 1970, 37 countries have halved the probability of their citizens dying before age 70 in 31 years or less, including seven of the world’s most populous countries. This group of seven countries— Bangladesh, China, Iran, Italy, Japan, South Korea, and Vietnam—is remarkably diverse in terms of geography, politics, income level, and their “starting point” (their country’s probability of premature death in the year that the 50% reduction began). If such different nations from such varying starting points could achieve this goal, it’s a feasible one. : Looking forward, based on the rich pipeline of candidates being developed today, suggests that about 450 new medicines, vaccines, and diagnostics for preventing and treating infectious diseases and maternal-health conditions will be launched before 2050. When countries adopt and widely disseminate such new health technologies, the decline in premature death . To give just one example: tuberculosis (TB) is the No. 1 infectious cause of premature death worldwide, but the vaccine we have against it is not widely used because it’s not very effective. However, there are three promising vaccine candidates that are now in late-stage clinical trials, and it seems likely that at least one will be approved. Having a highly effective TB vaccine would be a true game changer. So, if “50 by 50” is feasible and would be transformative, what do countries need to do to reach it? The path to halving premature death requires governments to take four critical steps. The first step is to focus on the biggest killers. Out of the many thousands of health conditions listed in the latest version of the —the “Bible” of health conditions—just 15 of these explain most of the difference in life expectancy between the regions where people live longest and those where they live the shortest lives. Eight are maternal conditions and infectious diseases, such as diarrhea, pneumonia, and TB. Seven are non-communicable diseases and injuries, including diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, road injuries, and suicide. The path to “50 by 50” runs through tackling these 15 priority conditions. The second step is for governments to finance the delivery of highly effective, high value-for-money prevention and treatment services that can reduce illness and death from these 15 conditions. Examples include expanding childhood immunizations and low-cost prevention and treatments for cardiovascular disease. Global immunization coverage last year, and low measles vaccine coverage in some parts of the world has led to measles outbreaks, and so action will be needed to close these immunization gaps. There is no “one size fits all” prescription for each country: the specific interventions that are required will have to be locally contextualized to each country’s health needs and situation. Scaling up delivery of prevention and treatment services will require substantial financial investments, which may be challenging for resource-constrained nations. Governments will need to prioritize health spending amidst competing demands and explore ways to raise revenue, such as improving their tax systems. : The third step is to make medicines more accessible and affordable to everyone. In many parts of the world, paying out-of-pocket costs for commonly prescribed medicines, such as for high blood pressure or diabetes, places a on individuals and households, and can even push people into poverty. The government should subsidize these costs. It should buy large volumes of critical medicines for the 15 priority conditions to ensure wide availability. The fourth step is for governments to increase taxation on tobacco products and unhealthy foods and drinks, while reducing the typically very large subsidies on fossil fuels. These policies would not only reduce illness and death attributable to those products but would also raise needed revenue for cash-strapped governments. While all these fiscal policies are win-win, by far the biggest priority is high taxes on tobacco. Smoking is one of the biggest causes of preventable mortality in many parts of the world, and can do more to reduce premature mortality than any other single policy outside of the health system. While the steps we outlined above are aimed mostly at national governments, there is also an important role for international health organizations and foreign aid donors in supporting countries in reaching “50 by 50.” Aid should be directed towards countries with the fewest resources to help strengthen their health systems to better control the 15 high priority conditions. And the international community should step up its investments in tackling the shared threats that cross national boundaries, like reducing the development and spread of , preparing for and responding to pandemics, and developing and disseminating new health technologies. Regional economic, political, and strategic disputes could limit much needed support and collaboration for achieving “50 by 50,” so continued advocacy and diplomacy will be required to maintain global momentum. It is easy to get despondent about the state of the world. But at least in one domain, there is good reason to double down on past success: “50 by 50” is a prize within reach. As we conclude in our report, “by focusing resources on a narrow set of conditions and scaling up financing to develop new health technologies, we believe that the global health landscape can be utterly transformed within our lifetimes.”

Previous: online games xo
Next: xtreme online casino