Justin Trudeau faces heavy criticism for dancing at Taylor Swift event as protesters burnt Montreal
Elon Musk entertains idea of buying MSNBC
Windows 10 End-of-Life Alert: Millions Face a New Security Tax
Musk Teases Buying MSNBC: ‘How Much Does It Cost?’
Justin Trudeau faces heavy criticism for dancing at Taylor Swift event as protesters burnt Montreal
IUS holds Next Big Thing ContestNASCAR has fired back at 23XI Racing and Front Row Motorsports after the teams filed a second preliminary injunction against them. On Wednesday, the sanctioning body took issue with the expedited timeline requested, insisting it was a strategic ploy intended to give the racing organizations an advantage. One day prior, Jeffrey Kessler - the attorney for Michael Jordan 's 23XI and Front Row Motorsports - announced that his clients would be refiling a motion for a preliminary injunction. The current charter agreement has rules in place that don’t allow litigation to be posed against NASCAR on antitrust grounds - prompting the teams to ask for a preliminary injunction that’d grant them the ability to compete under a 2025 charter agreement as the lawsuit transpires. "Consistent with Judge Whitney's earlier ruling, 23XI and Front Row Motorsports are submitting a second preliminary injunction to the court with new evidence," Kessler wrote. "My clients are also seeking this relief to strike down the release language that NASCAR removed from its open agreements but still maintains in its charter agreements as part of its monopolistic control. I'm confident the court will act to protect my clients from NASCAR's anticompetitive conduct." Toni Breidinger makes decision on NASCAR future by agreeing 2025 move NASCAR fans spot curious detail in new F1 team announcement According to Sportsnaut’s Matt Weaver , Through attorney Chris Yates, NASCAR alleged that Kessler and the pair of teams intended to re-file a preliminary injunction last week but opted to wait until just before Thanksgiving to officially put in their claim in hopes of catching the governing body off guard. 23XI and Front Row requested that a response from NASCAR be filed no later than December 6, while the governing body reasoned that the motion to expedite should be denied. “Plaintiffs’ motion to expedite should be denied. Plaintiffs tactically delayed filing their new motion for a preliminary injunction for over a week, intentionally dropping it on NASCAR and the Court on the eve of the Thanksgiving holiday after first posting about it on social media many hours before filing,” the latest filing read. “In that post, Plaintiffs’ counsel described that Plaintiffs were submitting a second preliminary injunction motion, but Plaintiffs’ counsel did not file that motion until hours later and did not provide the unredacted version to Defendants’ counsel until another two hours later—just hours before midnight (after re-posting their social media posting about the second preliminary injunction motion in the interim).” DON'T MISS: Joe Rogan reacts after being accused of 'preying on people's vulnerabilities' Stephen A. Smith's mind explodes after Jerry Jones makes Cowboys suggestion Matt Rhule expecting up to 50 Nebraska players to enter transfer portal Given the upcoming Thanksgiving weekend, NASCAR proposed that their response be due on December 9, arguing that the “expedited proposal fails to provide ... sufficient time to review and investigate, particularly given the Thanksgiving holiday weekend and the fact that Defendants are working to prepare an answer and responsive briefing that are due on December 2.” Judge Whitney ultimately sided with NASCAR, allowing their response to be submitted on December 9. 23XI and Front Row, meanwhile, must reply by noon on December 12. Once these are both handed in, the court will schedule a date to hear oral arguments.