online casino fishing game
Hail Flutie: BC celebrates 40th anniversary of Miracle in Miami
Principal U.S. Mega-Cap ETF ( NASDAQ:USMC – Get Free Report ) declared a dividend on Friday, December 27th, NASDAQ Dividends reports. Stockholders of record on Friday, December 27th will be given a dividend of 0.1501 per share on Tuesday, December 31st. The ex-dividend date is Friday, December 27th. Principal U.S. Mega-Cap ETF Trading Down 1.4 % Shares of Principal U.S. Mega-Cap ETF stock opened at $60.86 on Friday. Principal U.S. Mega-Cap ETF has a 1 year low of $46.14 and a 1 year high of $61.98. The company’s fifty day simple moving average is $59.50 and its 200-day simple moving average is $56.63. The company has a market cap of $2.68 billion, a price-to-earnings ratio of 26.66 and a beta of 0.92. Principal U.S. Mega-Cap ETF Company Profile ( Get Free Report ) See Also Receive News & Ratings for Principal U.S. Mega-Cap ETF Daily - Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts' ratings for Principal U.S. Mega-Cap ETF and related companies with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter .Trump expresses ‘gratitude’ for Jimmy Carter after his deathSALT LAKE CITY (AP) — A Department of Homeland Security agent who the FBI says conspired with another agent to sell an illicit drug known as “bath salts” pleaded not guilty to a drug distribution conspiracy charge Friday in federal court. A grand jury in Salt Lake City brought the criminal charge against Special Agent David Cole of the Homeland Security Investigations unit earlier this week. The indictment alleges that Cole abused his position as a federal law enforcement agent to obtain and sell drugs for profit. If convicted, he faces a maximum penalty of 20 years in prison. Cole took drugs that had been seized as evidence, telling colleagues he was using them for legitimate investigations, and instead sold them to a confidential informant who resold the drugs for profit on the streets of Utah, according to the indictment. The informant, who has a lengthy criminal history, had been recruited by federal agents to work for them upon his release from prison. But in addition to conducting controlled buys from suspected drug dealers as directed by investigators, the informant said he was compelled by Cole and another agent to also engage in illegal sales. The investigation began after the informant’s defense attorney contacted the U.S. Attorney in Utah in October to report that agents had required him to engage in potentially illegal acts dating from last spring to early December. Details of drug sales offered by the informant were confirmed through surveillance and other sources, the FBI said. Cole and the second agent — identified in court documents only as “Person A” — profited up to $300,000 from the illegal scheme, according to an FBI affidavit filed in the case. FBI spokesperson Sandra Barker said Friday that “Person A” had not been arrested or charged, but the investigation was ongoing. Cole, 50, of South Jordan, Utah, entered the courtroom Friday handcuffed and hunched over, wearing a white and gray, striped jumpsuit. U.S. Magistrate Judge Dustin Pead accepted Cole's not guilty plea and scheduled a trial for the week of Feb. 24. Federal officials say Cole’s indictment sends a message that officers who break the law and undermine the public’s trust in law enforcement will be prosecuted. “A drug dealer who carries a badge is still a drug dealer — and one who has violated an oath to uphold the law and protect the public,” said Nicole Argentieri, head of the U.S. Justice Department’s Criminal Division. "No one is above the law.” Special Agent Shohini Sinha, who leads the FBI's Salt Lake City field office, said Cole’s alleged actions helped fuel an already devastating drug crisis . Ingestion of synthetic bath salts, also known as Alpha-PVP or cathinone, can lead to bizarre behavior such as paranoia and extreme strength, according to authorities who say it’s similar to methamphetamine, cocaine or ecstasy. They are unrelated to actual bathing products. Cole’s attorney, Alexander Ramos, has declined to directly address the criminal allegations but said his client has a strong reputation within the federal law enforcement community. Ramos did not immediately respond Friday to emails seeking comment on the not guilty plea. The Homeland Security Investigations department where Cole worked conducts federal criminal investigations into the illegal movement of people, goods, money, weapons, drugs and sensitive technology into, out of and across the U.S. Cole and the second agent had their credentials suspended but have not been fired, according to court documents.
SHEIN is launching the ULTIMATE Giftorium experience just in time for the Festive SeasonSen. Chuck Schumer wants expanded surveillance and drone detection systems for the tristate area following numerous reports of the unmanned flying vehicles disturbing residents . Schumer (D-N.Y.) said federal authorities should hand more power to state and local law enforcement to deal with the drones. “Locals should not have to shake an eight ball to get desperate answers on non-stop drone sightings when the feds can do more to help,” Schumer said Sunday. New Jersey residents have been bothered by drones since late November and numerous recent sightings have been reported in Queens, the Bronx and the Hudson Valley . On Friday night, runways at Stewart International Airport in Orange County were shut down for an hour due to drones. Gov. Hochul said Sunday that the federal government had approved a “state-of-the-art” drone detection system for the state. But that was only one system, a small step in the desired effort, according to Schumer’s office. Schumer specifically focused on a company called Robin, which makes drone detection technology. Over the summer, the Netherlands purchased 51 Robin drone radar systems and sent them to Ukraine . “I want [Robin] deployed across New York and New Jersey and the metro area widely to help give us concrete answers on what is going on and from where,” Schumer said Sunday. “The (briefings) I have had tell me there is no evidence that this is a government or foreign activity and so we have to answer the logical question of ‘Who?’” Federal authorities have downplayed the threat of the drones . The FBI and Department of Homeland Security said Thursday there is no evidence of the drones flying in restricted airspace. In fact, according to the feds, many of the reported “drone” sightings were actually “manned aircraft, operating lawfully.” Republican lawmakers and leaders have urged the federal government to take more decisive action by simply shooting the drones down. It is illegal for private citizens to shoot down drones so the military would have to handle any such action. “Can this really be happening without our government’s knowledge,” President-elect Donald Trump wrote Friday on social media . “I don’t think so! Let the public know, and now. Otherwise, shoot them down!!!” It is illegal to fly drones in New York City without a permit , leading New York leaders to call for help from the feds. “Our federal partners are deploying a state-of-the-art drone detection system to New York State,” Hochul said in a statement. “This system will support state and federal law enforcement in their investigations. We are grateful to the Biden Administration for their support, but ultimately we need further assistance from Congress.” Hochul mentioned a bill that would allow state and local authorities to respond to drones without consulting the feds first. The bill has not yet hit the Senate floor.
Huntington Bancshares Incorporated ( NASDAQ:HBANL – Get Free Report ) announced a quarterly dividend on Thursday, October 17th, Wall Street Journal reports. Stockholders of record on Wednesday, January 1st will be paid a dividend of 0.4298 per share on Wednesday, January 15th. This represents a $1.72 dividend on an annualized basis and a dividend yield of 6.62%. The ex-dividend date of this dividend is Tuesday, December 31st. Huntington Bancshares Stock Performance Shares of NASDAQ HBANL opened at $25.95 on Friday. Huntington Bancshares has a 52-week low of $23.62 and a 52-week high of $26.61. The firm has a 50 day moving average price of $26.06 and a 200 day moving average price of $25.57. Huntington Bancshares Company Profile ( Get Free Report ) Further Reading Receive News & Ratings for Huntington Bancshares Daily - Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of the latest news and analysts' ratings for Huntington Bancshares and related companies with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter .
Two leading semiconductor companies square off in court With the end of testimony on day 3 of the Qualcomm/Arm trial, the only items remaining were the closing arguments, instructions for the jury and their deliberations. The jury didn’t reach a verdict after several hours, so deliberations will continue Friday. In addition, testimony for the countersuit about Arm’s use of Nuvia design suggestions was not completed and will continue after the holiday break, which would be on or after court resumes on January 3, 2025. If the jury does not reach a verdict today, while not confirmed, it is assumed that deliberations will continue on Jan. 3. So, I am taking this opportunity to cover the day 4 proceedings, as well as to reflect on some of the insights that have arisen through the trial. Disclosure: My company, Tirias Research, has consulted for Arm, Qualcomm and other companies mentioned in this article. The Jury Is Out Procedurally, Arm, the plaintiff, made its closing arguments, followed by Qualcomm, the defendant. An Arm rebuttal followed the closing arguments, and Qualcomm was allowed to provide a brief rebuttal because the third question being decided by the jury is related to Qualcomm’s counterclaim. The three statements the jury was instructed to rule on were (note that these are summarized): Arm’s closing argument focused on the Nuvia ALA agreement. Arm went line by line through several sections of the Nuvia ALA agreement and matched it with expert testimony, primarily from Qualcomm and Nuvia staff. Arm also made arguments against Qualcomm's claims made throughout the trial. FBI Warns Gmail, Outlook, Apple Mail Users—Check 3 Things To Stop Attacks New Gmail Security Warning For 2.5 Billion—Second Attack Wave Incoming Mystery Drone Sightings: New York Adds Dozens Of Drone Bans After New Jersey (Updated) Qualcomm’s closing argument was a more impassioned argument about what Arm is requesting, the destruction of intellectual property (IP) that took considerable engineering effort to develop, and a timeline of events relative to the legal actions and the Nuvia and Qualcomm CPU designs. Qualcomm argued that the designs and information transferred to Qualcomm at the time of the transaction were Nuvia IP that only included only 1% of Arm IP, which were the opcodes that link the hardware microarchitecture to the Arm software instruction set architecture (ISA). Qualcomm also argued that these opcodes are regenerated regularly, and the original code was not included in the design at the time the termination notice was received or future Qualcomm CPU designs that began after the acquisition. Qualcomm also argued that the Qualcomm CPU designs are covered by the Qualcomm ALA, which is the basis of the counterclaim. Qualcomm also used testimony, primarily from Arm, to support its argument. Both sides also used very select testimony to try to undermine the credibility of some of the expert witnesses and demonstrate the opposing party's intent in their closing arguments. Immediately after closing arguments, the judge read the jury instructions, and the jury was sequestered under guard. As there is little to do while waiting for a verdict, this is a good time to highlight some of the insights that have arisen from the trial. Insights From The Trial The most interesting thing about a civil trial between two companies is the confidential information that is made public, and this case is no different. Some of the information brought into public view included details of Arm contracts, Qualcomm roadmaps and design information, and behind-the-scenes communication of the parties through letters, emails, internal presentations, and chats. The following are some of the insights gleaned from the testimony and documents: With the relationship between the two companies deteriorating, Qualcomm may have to consider using another architecture before its ALA expires in 2033. Even if Arm offers a new license, the terms are likely to be less favorable given the recent history between the two companies and the goals of Arm’s management. Note that Qualcomm does have a license to use the latest Armv9 architecture. Analyst Insights Thus far, I have sought to keep my own analyses and opinions out of my reports on the trial, but there are a few points worth making. Final Thoughts As a technologist, I can appreciate the challenge of this case. It is more than just about the terms of the contract, it is fundamentally tied to the related technology and chip designs. In this case, attorneys are presenting a case using technical experts and attempting to communicate their technical knowledge to a group of people that probably have little to no technical knowledge. As a result, both parties relied on analogies, Arm leveraged a piano analogy, and Qualcomm leveraged a building analogy. Neither was completely accurate or effective, but any analogy is subject to interpretation. As I have maintained, the outcome of this case will depend upon how the jury interprets the contract and the information presented, and it is impossible to predict it. However, regardless of how the scales of justice tip in this case, it is likely to impact technology license agreements going forward and cause concern throughout the broader Arm ecosystem about potential competition with Arm, especially for ALA licensees. It could also accelerate development of alternative ISA ecosystems such as RISC-V which are already starting to gain momentum.
Hydro Ottawa finds time savings while testing Google’s AI
NORAD's Santa tracker was a Cold War morale boost. Now it attracts millions of kidsSA secures WTC final spot: Impact on India & Australia
In the world of gaming, the latest release of Spider-Man 2 for PC has become one of the hottest topics, particularly due to the impressive technology driving its groundbreaking graphics and gameplay. With the much-anticipated sequel, developers have pushed the envelope on what gamers can expect in terms of visual fidelity and immersive experiences. Meeting the Minimum To even swing through the bustling streets of New York as Spider-Man, players will need a machine that meets the minimum requirements. These include a decent mid-range processor and graphics card: an Intel Core i5 or Ryzen equivalent paired with an NVIDIA GTX 1060 or AMD RX 580, ensuring the game performs smoothly at 1080p resolution. A minimum of 8GB RAM and Windows 10 support are also essential. Recommended for Realism For those wishing to experience the full beauty of Spider-Man 2’s detailed open world, the recommended specifications are more demanding. An Intel Core i7 or Ryzen 5 processor combined with an NVIDIA RTX 2060 or AMD RX 5700 graphics card will allow for ray-tracing and high frame rates at 1440p, providing an almost cinematic feel. Boosting RAM to 16GB and running on Windows 11 will further enhance performance. Future-Proof Gaming Reflecting the trend towards hyper-realism in gaming, developers have ensured that Spider-Man 2 remains a benchmark for future titles. With the growing capabilities of new hardware, Spider-Man 2 on PC provides gamers an early peek at the future of digital entertainment. The Rise of Spider-Man 2: Setting New Standards in PC Gaming In the fast-evolving world of gaming, “Spider-Man 2” for PC has quickly ascended as a prominent title, renowned for its exceptional graphics and immersive gameplay. As enthusiasts dive into its captivating rendition of New York City, new developments and insights surrounding the game continue to capture attention beyond its initial release. Comprehensive Features and Use Cases “Spider-Man 2” pushes PC gaming boundaries through its use of advanced graphical technologies such as ray-tracing, which brings unprecedented realism to the bustling streets of its open world. The game’s dynamic weather system and day-night cycle further enhance the immersive experience, allowing players to engage in a universe that feels both authentic and vivid. The integration of these features ensures that players are not just spectators but active participants in Spider-Man’s heroic journey. The Ups and Downs: Pros and Cons Pros: – Striking Visuals: The game’s use of cutting-edge technology delivers stunning graphics that elevate gameplay to new heights. – Immersive Experience: Advanced rendering and dynamic environments create a deeply engaging gaming environment. – Optimized for Future Hardware: “Spider-Man 2” is designed to leverage current and upcoming technological advances, ensuring its lasting appeal. Cons: – High Hardware Demands: The game’s high-end requirements may limit accessibility for players without robust systems. – Windows 11 Preference: While it supports Windows 10, the optimal experience is delivered on Windows 11, requiring potential OS upgrades. Market Insights and Predictions The buzz surrounding “Spider-Man 2” signifies a broader trend towards gaming experiences that prioritize realism and immersion. This is indicative of a market increasingly favoring titles that fully exploit the capabilities of next-gen hardware. As gaming technology advances, we can predict a sustained emphasis on enhancing sensory realism, interactivity, and storytelling in future game designs. Pricing and Availability While the game’s phenomenal features may imply a premium price point, developers have sought to balance accessibility with quality. “Spider-Man 2” is competitively priced, aligning with industry standards for AAA titles, which typically range from $50 to $70. Regular updates and potential addition of DLC content further enhance its value proposition for gamers. Security Concerns and Compatibility As with any major gaming release, maintaining robust security measures to protect players’ data is crucial. Developers have ensured that “Spider-Man 2” employs comprehensive security protocols to safeguard users against potential threats. Moreover, while compatibility issues may arise due to the game’s preference for high-spec systems, patches and updates are anticipated to address most performance challenges, broadening the game’s accessibility over time. For more insights and the latest developments in gaming technology, visit the official PlayStation website .Pet passports for dogs, cats and ferrets to travel within UK ‘an outrage’
Shoppers bemused as Easter eggs hit shop shelves before New Year’s Eve
Report: Kentucky QB Brock Vandagriff retires from football