首页 > 646 jili 777

esports news philippines

2025-01-13
A 7-year-old rivalry between tech leaders Elon Musk and Sam Altman over who should run OpenAI and prevent an artificial intelligence “dictatorship” is now heading to a federal judge as Musk seeks to halt the ChatGPT maker’s ongoing shift into a for-profit company. Musk, an early OpenAI investor and board member, sued the artificial intelligence company earlier this year alleging it had betrayed its founding aims as a nonprofit research lab benefiting the public good rather than pursuing profits. Musk has since escalated the dispute, adding new claims and asking for a court order that would stop OpenAI’s plans to convert itself into a for-profit business more fully. The world’s richest man, whose companies include Tesla, SpaceX and social media platform X, last year started his own rival AI company, xAI. Musk says it faces unfair competition from OpenAI and its close business partner Microsoft, which has supplied the huge computing resources needed to build AI systems such as ChatGPT. “OpenAI and Microsoft together exploiting Musk’s donations so they can build a for-profit monopoly, one now specifically targeting xAI, is just too much,” says Musk’s filing that alleges the companies are violating the terms of Musk’s foundational contributions to the charity. OpenAI is filing a response Friday opposing Musk’s requested order, saying it would cripple OpenAI’s business and mission to the advantage of Musk and his own AI company. A hearing is set for January before U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers in Oakland. At the heart of the dispute is a 2017 internal power struggle at the fledgling startup that led to Altman becoming OpenAI’s CEO. Musk also wanted the job, according to emails revealed as part of the court case, but grew frustrated after two other OpenAI co-founders said he would hold too much power as a major shareholder and chief executive if the startup succeeded in its goal to achieve better-than-human AI known as artificial general intelligence, or AGI. Musk has long voiced concerns about how advanced forms of AI could threaten humanity. “The current structure provides you with a path where you end up with unilateral absolute control over the AGI,” said a 2017 email to Musk from co-founders Ilya Sutskever and Greg Brockman. “You stated that you don’t want to control the final AGI, but during this negotiation, you’ve shown to us that absolute control is extremely important to you.” In the same email, titled “Honest Thoughts,” Sutskever and Brockman also voiced concerns about Altman’s desire to be CEO and whether he was motivated by “political goals.” Altman eventually succeeded in becoming CEO, and has remained so except for a period last year when he was fired and then reinstated days later after the board that ousted him was replaced. OpenAI published the messages Friday in a blog post meant to show its side of the story, particularly Musk’s early support for the idea of making OpenAI a for-profit business so it could raise money for the hardware and computer power that AI needs. It was Musk, through his wealth manager Jared Birchall, who first registered “Open Artificial Technologies Technologies, Inc.”, a public benefit corporation, in September 2017. Then came the “Honest Thoughts” email that Musk described as the “final straw.” “Either go do something on your own or continue with OpenAI as a nonprofit,” Musk wrote back. OpenAI said Musk later proposed merging the startup into Tesla before resigning as the co-chair of OpenAI’s board in early 2018. Musk didn’t immediately respond to emailed requests for comment sent to his companies Friday. Asked about his frayed relationship with Musk at a New York Times conference last week, Altman said he felt “tremendously sad” but also characterized Musk’s legal fight as one about business competition. “He’s a competitor and we’re doing well,” Altman said. He also said at the conference that he is “not that worried” about the Tesla CEO’s influence with President-elect Donald Trump. OpenAI said Friday that Altman plans to make a $1 million personal donation to Trump’s inauguration fund, joining a number of tech companies and executives who are working to improve their relationships with the incoming administration. __________ The Associated Press and OpenAI have a licensing and technology agreement allowing OpenAI access to part of the AP’s text archives.esports news philippines

Hyderabad: The cybercrime police arrested one person here on charges of operating a mule account and assisting cybercriminals. The accused Mohammad Awad, an AC technician and food delivery agent from Dabeerpura was arrested based on a complaint filed by a woman from Mancherial who was duped of Rs 3.16 lakh. The money was traced to Awad’s account. According to police, Awad had opened three accounts in his name and provided details to a man named Ilyias for a commission of Rs 300 for every 1 lakh transferred into his account. Cybercriminals dupe innocent people into facilitating transactions for their crimes by renting out their bank accounts or asking them to create new bank accounts in exchange for a commission. Fraudsters use these accounts to launder money and make it difficult to track, police said. In August this year, a SBI branch manager Shamsheer Gunj was arrested for facilitating cybercrime of Rs 175 crore. He lured poor people into opening current accounts in return for a commission. These accounts were then used to withdraw and divert funds related to cybercrime. The issue came to light when cyber security bureau’s data analysis team detected approximately 600 complaints on the National Cybercrime Reporting Portal (NCRP) against six accounts at the SBI branch of Shamsheer Gunj. Investigation revealed that large sums of money had been transacted from these accounts over a short period of two months; from March to April 2024. The police have urged individuals to monitor their account activity closely and promptly report any suspicion of having inadvertently opened a mule account. Reports can be made via the cybercrime helpline at 1930 or through their official website, cybercrime.gov.in .Report: Iowa CB Jermari Harris opts out of rest of season



‘Democracy Works’ awarded to those who champion change

Justin Schultz announced that he would retire immediately, effective Friday morning, for personal reasons. Schultz is a 34-year-old defenseman who played in 745 career games with 324 points (71 G, 253 A). Most recently, Schultz played for the Seattle Kraken , joining the team in 2022. He played in 143 games for the Kraken, scoring 60 points during his time with the team. Following the 2023-24 season, Schultz was an unrestricted free agent. He stated he sought a “unique opportunity in the later stages of his career” before signing with HC Lugano . He played in eight games with six assists for the team. My choice is strictly a personal one. I discussed this with my family and concluded that I should end my career here and return to Canada. I’m thankful to HC Lugano for their professionalism and respecting my choice, and I wish the club and the team to succeed again. Schultz was drafted in the second round, 43rd overall, by the Anaheim Ducks in the 2008 NHL Draft . Following his draft, Schultz continued playing with the University of Wisconsin. After becoming a free agent following his college career, Schultz signed with the Edmonton Oilers during the 2012-13 season. He went on to play in 248 games over four seasons for the Oilers with 101 points. Schultz was traded to the Pittsburgh Penguins in February of 2016 and was with them for five seasons. During this time, he scored 113 points over 234 games. In 2016, Schultz played in 15 Stanley Cup Playoff games, including all six of the Finals, to help Pittsburgh win the Stanley Cup. During the 2016-17 season, he scored 13 points over 21 playoff games, helping the Penguins win a second championship. Schultz also played for the Washington Capitals for two seasons, with 50 points over 120 games before signing with the Seattle Kraken. Congratulations and best of luck, Schultz! This article first appeared on Inside The Rink and was syndicated with permission.Testimony begins in Bow pink wristband lawsuit

Will satellite broadband services truly be a game-changer?Article content The recent announcement of a temporary GST/HST holiday on select food purchases, running from Dec. 14 to Feb. 15, has drawn significant attention. Recommended Videos While the move has been framed as a helpful measure for Canadians during the holidays and the challenging winter months, it is critical to unpack its implications. Beyond the political spin, the economic reality of this measure deserves closer scrutiny. The government’s narrative suggests substantial relief for Canadians. However, the actual savings may be far more modest. For groceries, the average Canadian household stands to save just $4.51 in taxes over the two months, while dining out could offer $19.51 in tax savings. While every dollar counts, the idea that this measure will lead to significant financial relief is overstated unless one is a frequent purchaser of high-ticket alcohol or luxury dining options. For most, this “GST vacation” is more a token gesture than transformative economic aid. Restaurants are likely to gain the most from this policy. Canadians already spend a record $187 per month dining out, and the tax break might encourage more to opt for dining services rather than home cooking. Meanwhile, the cost of staples like ground beef at the grocery store is unlikely to change. Paradoxically, someone ordering a $29 burger meal through Uber Eats might see greater savings than someone cooking a homemade holiday meal. This prioritization raises questions about the measure’s alignment with its intended purpose. The holidays are traditionally a time for home cooking, celebrating with unique, meaningful meals surrounded by loved ones. This policy, by making dining out more attractive, risks undermining the cultural and economic value of cooking at home. At its core, taxing food at grocery stores remains a controversial practice. Food is a necessity, and imposing taxes on it is widely regarded as regressive and, some argue, even immoral. While the temporary removal of GST on some grocery items is welcome, its short-term nature creates confusion and potentially inflationary pressures. Retail food pricing operates on razor-thin margins, where pricing strategies hinge on pennies. A two-month tax exemption introduces uncertainty, as grocers might adjust prices upward to offset the perceived tax void, exacerbating food inflation. A permanent exemption, by contrast, would have avoided such unintended consequences, providing clarity and stability for both consumers and retailers. On top of this, direct cash transfers, like the government’s decision to give $250 to millions of Canadians, can inadvertently fuel inflation. Injecting more money into the economy without addressing underlying structural issues in food supply chains creates excess demand, which inevitably leads to higher prices. While this might provide short-term relief, it risks making food affordability an even greater challenge for everyone in the long term. RECOMMENDED VIDEO Quebec is currently the only province requiring signage to indicate which grocery items are taxed, offering a level of transparency that is absent elsewhere in Canada. Without such clarity, Canadians may struggle to understand which items are exempt and when. The temporary nature of the policy compounds this confusion, leaving many in the dark about how much they are actually saving – or even what qualifies for the exemption. Trudeau’s GST holiday casts him in the role of Canada’s Santa Claus, delivering a modest gift to Canadians. While this measure is likely to be appreciated by many, its short-term and poorly targeted nature raises serious concerns. Inadvertently, it may encourage dining out over home cooking and introduce inflationary risks to food pricing. The gesture, though well-intentioned, is shortsighted. What Canadians truly need is long-term, structural change to food taxation policies–not fleeting measures that complicate an already strained food economy. A permanent GST exemption on all grocery items would have been a far more effective solution, avoiding the confusion and potential harm caused by this temporary measure. In the end, Canadians deserve more than a holiday-season band-aid. Addressing food affordability and food inflation requires thoughtful, comprehensive policies – not a short-lived tax holiday and direct cash payments that risk becoming a Trojan horse for higher prices. – Dr. Sylvain Charlebois is the Director of the Agri-Food Analytics Lab at Dalhousie University and co-host of The Food Professor Podcast

Previous: esports history
Next: esports or e-sports