Off-road vehicle seized after 'antisocial driver breaches High Court injunction'
MPs impeach acting S Korea president Han
NoneKings fire coach Mike Brown less than halfway through his 3rd season, AP source saysNew 2025 laws hit hot topics from AI in movies to rapid-fire guns
Amateur concert photographer Larry Schorr says he can’t always keep track of the countless photos — or “pitchers” as he likes to call them — in his collection squirreled away in boxes, closets or books in his Nob Hill apartment. But if he had to choose, he says, his all-time favorite would be a close-up shot of Jello Biafra with the Dead Kennedys at the now-closed Mabuhay Gardens in 1978. Biafra’s eyes are wide, his pupils dark with intensity and the light casting his face in a glow as he screams into a microphone, frozen midsong. This expression, this pause in the heady energy of a rock ’n’ roll performance, frozen in time, is a trademark of Schorr’s style, what he likes to call “stage portraiture.” “My concert photography was a lot different than a lot of other people’s concert photography,” Schorr, 73, told The Examiner. “I go towards stillness more than I do action. I look for parts when everything is still on the stage.” Schorr’s work captured some of the most iconic 20th-century rock ’n’ roll performers, some when they were first starting out and others at their peak. He says he photographed performers such as Blondie, Pink Floyd and individual members of The Beatles (after their 1970 breakup), all at classic venues in The City and throughout the Bay Area. But unlike other concert photographers of the era, Schorr’s work has remained relatively unknown and almost entirely unpublished, save for a solo show at a local bar nearly 15 years ago and a couple of book inclusions in the last 20 years. Schorr has remained hidden from the spotlight, and with it, the photos of the legends he amassed during one of The City’s biggest eras for live music — until now. Retired from his day job as a computer programmer, Schorr said that he has in the last month gained new motivation to put himself out there for the first time as some of his subjects approach milestone anniversaries of their debut albums. He said he has seen an opportunity to reach out to them with his work. On a recent dreary December morning, Schorr told The Examiner that he had just gotten off the phone with the son of a well-known British artist he asked to remain unnamed who was excited “to see all of them” and was “really interested in buying a lot of pictures right now.” Schorr said he could have been a professional photographer if he’d wanted to, learning the trade from an uncle as a teenager and photographing his high-school yearbook. He said he graduated with a photography degree in 1973 from the Rochester Institute of Technology in New York. But ultimately, he said, he didn’t like feeling he had to “hustle” to get his photos out there. “That’s not my personality, really,” he said. “I’m a back-office kind of guy, not an out-front salesperson.” Instead, he said, he took off for San Francisco as soon as he graduated and landed a job working in a record store. From there, Schorr said, he tried to attend as many live shows as possible and feed his true passion. One of the first big shows Schorr said he remembered attending after arriving in The City was in November 1973 at the Cow Palace, where The Who was just starting its tour for the album “Quadrophenia” with Lynyrd Skynyrd as the opening act. Schorr said he recalls that night especially well because that was the iconic moment when Keith Moon, The Who’s drummer, passed out on stage and a member of the audience, Scott Halpin, was recruited from the audience to fill in. “[Moon] took a bunch of stuff backstage, and they kind of hit him while he was playing, and he went down, and they had to drag him out backstage,” Schorr said. “[Halpin] came up and he played drums on about four blues numbers with the band.” Schorr said he liked the photos he got from that night, but Cow Palace was far from his favorite venue. Armed with a single film camera at the time — a 1968 Nikon F — he said he preferred venues where he could get as close as possible to his subjects without the benefits of a press pass or other special treatment a photo pass might get him. “Most of my pictures don’t have more than one person in the picture,” he said. “Most of them, I took it with my 200 mm lens, and I was usually right up near the front.” On the rare occasion he was able to get backstage, he said, he took advantage of the situation, as he did in 1981 at the Oakland Coliseum with Blue Öyster Cult . “We got to hang out with their drummer, Albert Bouchard, our favorite one,” he said. “[Bouchard] invited us onto the tour bus, and we were just chatting about all sorts of stuff and doing lines of coke.” But that was the beginning of the end, he said, as in the 1980s, venues started becoming stricter about requiring photo passes, and he didn’t want to deal with the hassle. He said he hung up his camera, and let it gather dust for the next several decades in his closet. It wasn’t until 2010 that he approached Michael “Spike” Krouse, the owner of Madrone Art Bar at Fell and Divisadero about putting on a show of his work. “I immediately, when looking through the photographs, saw a treasure trove of images,” Krouse told The Examiner about that first meeting. Hearing Schorr’s story is what sold it, he said. “I’m kind of a history buff when it comes to that kind of stuff, ‘So I was like, ‘Oh, man, this is great,’” he said. “I mean, he had Debbie Harry at the last Sex Pistols show, he had Elvis Costello — it was all in San Francisco at clubs like the Trocadero and Mabuhay Gardens, just so many old places that no longer exist.” Krouse said the show itself was a smashing success, and he felt that under different circumstances, Schorr could have been a well-known rock-and-roll photographer due to the technical skill behind his work alone. “They should be recognized for the quality that they are ... a lot of people go through different doors in life and end up going down different paths,” Krouse said. “But here’s a guy who had one path and went down another path for different circumstances.” “It’s not often that you find somebody who puts things away and then comes back to them 30 years later,” he said. While Schorr said his heart is in film photography, he dabbles with digital cameras, although he laments that they are not the same. He said doesn’t go to too many concerts anymore, due to his age and other circumstances, but Schorr always makes time to see his favorite artist — New York-based Kristeen Young — whenever she’s in town, and he snaps pictures for her. “He’s very good at getting the right moment, shooting the right moment — he’s very much an action sort of photographer,” Young said. “From what I can tell, he doesn’t do a lot of post-work on it. it’s just very authentic, and I think that’s what people respond to.” Young said she first met Schorr around five years ago after doing a show at DNA Lounge in San Francisco through Jello Biafra, a mutual friend, and the two quickly connected over music and photography. Young is more contemporary than the other subjects Schorr used to photograph, but he said she hearkens back to the artists of the era, that she’s truly “a musician’s musician.” “She’s not like anybody else,” he said. “There’s nobody else to compare her to.” Young said that the appreciation is mutual, and he fits in with her circle. “A lot of my following are other artists and eclectic people,” she said. “It makes me really happy that he finds something in my music that he likes. While Schorr has spent most of his adult life known more by his day job as a computer programmer rather than his artistic pursuits, he said he’s hopeful that could soon change. But no matter what, he said, he wouldn’t do anything differently. “While I was shooting the pictures, there would be no stress on me; there would be no tension on me,” he said, keeping his credo going even now as he finally puts his work out there. “It’s easy-peasy, at my own pace.”Ruling on Monday after an emergency hearing at Belfast High Court, judge Mr Justice McAlinden rejected loyalist activist Jamie Bryson’s application for leave for a full judicial review hearing against Northern Ireland Secretary Hilary Benn. The judge said Mr Bryson, who represented himself as a personal litigant, had “very ably argued” his case with “perseverance and cogency”, and had raised some issues of law that caused him “some concern”. However, he found against him on the three grounds of challenge against Mr Benn. Mr Bryson had initially asked the court to grant interim relief in his challenge to prevent Tuesday’s democratic consent motion being heard in the Assembly, pending the hearing of a full judicial review. However, he abandoned that element of his leave application during proceedings on Monday, after the judge made clear he would be “very reluctant” to do anything that would be “trespassing into the realms” of a democratically elected Assembly. Mr Bryson had challenged Mr Benn’s move to initiate the democratic consent process that is required under the UK and EU’s Windsor Framework deal to extend the trading arrangements that apply to Northern Ireland. The previously stated voting intentions of the main parties suggest that Stormont MLAs will vote to continue the measures for another four years when they convene to debate the motion on Tuesday. After the ruling, Mr Bryson told the court he intended to appeal to the Court of Appeal. Any hearing was not expected to come later on Monday. In applying for leave, the activist’s argument was founded on three key grounds. The first was the assertion that Mr Benn failed to make sufficient efforts to ensure Stormont’s leaders undertook a public consultation exercise in Northern Ireland before the consent vote. The second was that the Secretary of State allegedly failed to demonstrate he had paid special regard to protecting Northern Ireland’s place in the UK customs territory in triggering the vote. The third ground centred on law changes introduced by the previous UK government earlier this year, as part of its Safeguarding the Union deal to restore powersharing at Stormont. He claimed that if the amendments achieved their purpose, namely, to safeguard Northern Ireland’s place within the United Kingdom, then it would be unlawful to renew and extend post-Brexit trading arrangements that have created economic barriers between the region and the rest of the UK. In 2023, the UK Supreme Court unanimously ruled that the trading arrangements for Northern Ireland are lawful. The appellants in the case argued that legislation passed at Westminster to give effect to the Brexit Withdrawal Agreement conflicted with the 1800 Acts of Union that formed the United Kingdom, particularly article six of that statute guaranteeing unfettered trade within the UK. The Supreme Court found that while article six of the Acts of Union has been “modified” by the arrangements, that was done with the express will of a sovereign parliament, and so therefore was lawful. Mr Bryson contended that amendments made to the Withdrawal Agreement earlier this year, as part of the Safeguarding the Union measures proposed by the Government to convince the DUP to return to powersharing, purport to reassert and reinforce Northern Ireland’s constitutional status in light of the Supreme Court judgment. He told the court that it was “quite clear” there was “inconsistency” between the different legal provisions. “That inconsistency has to be resolved – there is an arguable case,” he told the judge. However, Dr Tony McGleenan KC, representing the Government, described Mr Bryson’s argument as “hopeless” and “not even arguable”. He said all three limbs of the case had “no prospect of success and serve no utility”. He added: “This is a political argument masquerading as a point of constitutional law and the court should see that for what it is.” After rising to consider the arguments, Justice McAlinden delivered his ruling shortly after 7pm. The judge dismissed the application on the first ground around the lack consultation, noting that such an exercise was not a “mandatory” obligation on Mr Benn. On the second ground, he said there were “very clear” indications that the Secretary of State had paid special regard to the customs territory issues. On the final ground, Justice McAlinden found there was no inconsistency with the recent legislative amendments and the position stated in the Supreme Court judgment. “I don’t think any such inconsistency exists,” he said. He said the amendments were simply a “restatement” of the position as set out by the Supreme Court judgment, and only served to confirm that replacing the Northern Ireland Protocol with the Windsor Framework had not changed the constitutional fact that Article Six of the Acts of Union had been lawfully “modified” by post-Brexit trading arrangements. “It does no more than that,” he said. The framework, and its predecessor the NI Protocol, require checks and customs paperwork on goods moving from Great Britain into Northern Ireland. Under the arrangements, which were designed to ensure no hardening of the Irish land border post-Brexit, Northern Ireland continues to follow many EU trade and customs rules. This has proved highly controversial, with unionists arguing the system threatens Northern Ireland’s place in the United Kingdom. Advocates of the arrangements say they help insulate the region from negative economic consequences of Brexit. A dispute over the so-called Irish Sea border led to the collapse of the Northern Ireland Assembly in 2022, when the DUP withdrew then-first minister Paul Givan from the coalition executive. The impasse lasted two years and ended in January when the Government published its Safeguarding the Union measures. Under the terms of the framework, a Stormont vote must be held on articles five to 10 of the Windsor Framework, which underpin the EU trade laws in force in Northern Ireland, before they expire. The vote must take place before December 17. Based on the numbers in the Assembly, MLAs are expected to back the continuation of the measures for another four years, even though unionists are likely to oppose the move. DUP leader Gavin Robinson has already made clear his party will be voting against continuing the operation of the Windsor Framework. Unlike other votes on contentious issues at Stormont, the motion does not require cross-community support to pass. If it is voted through with a simple majority, the arrangements are extended for four years. In that event, the Government is obliged to hold an independent review of how the framework is working. If it wins cross-community support, which is a majority of unionists and a majority of nationalists, then it is extended for eight years. The chances of it securing such cross-community backing are highly unlikely.By DAVID A. LIEB Artificial intelligence. Abortion. Guns. Marijuana. Minimum wages. Name a hot topic, and chances are good there’s a new law about it taking effect in 2025 in one state or another. Many of the laws launching in January are a result of legislation passed this year. Others stem from ballot measures approved by voters. Some face legal challenges. Here’s a look at some of the most notable state laws taking effect: California, home to Hollywood and some of the largest technology companies, is seeking to rein in the artificial intelligence industry and put some parameters around social media stars. New laws seek to prevent the use of digital replicas of Hollywood actors and performers without permission and allow the estates of dead performers to sue over unauthorized AI use. Parents who profit from social media posts featuring their children will be required to set aside some earnings for their young influencers. A new law also allows children to sue their parents for failing to do so. New social media restrictions in several states face court challenges. Related Articles National Politics | Trump has pressed for voting changes. GOP majorities in Congress will try to make that happen National Politics | Exhausted by political news? TV ratings and new poll say you’re not alone National Politics | Trump vows to pursue executions after Biden commutes most of federal death row National Politics | Elon Musk’s preschool is the next step in his anti-woke education dreams National Politics | Trump’s picks for top health jobs not just team of rivals but ‘team of opponents’ A Florida law bans children under 14 from having social media accounts and requires parental consent for ages 14 and 15. But enforcement is being delayed because of a lawsuit filed by two associations for online companies, with a hearing scheduled for late February. A new Tennessee law also requires parental consent for minors to open accounts on social media. NetChoice, an industry group for online businesses, is challenging the law. Another new state law requires porn websites to verify that visitors are at least 18 years old. But the Free Speech Coalition, a trade association for the adult entertainment industry, has filed a challenge. Several new California measures aimed at combating political deepfakes are also being challenged, including one requiring large social media platforms to remove deceptive content related to elections and another allowing any individual to sue for damages over the use of AI to create fabricated images or videos in political ads . In a first nationally, California will start enforcing a law prohibiting school districts from adopting policies that require staff to notify parents if their children change their gender identification . The law was a priority for Democratic lawmakers who wanted to halt such policies passed by several districts. Many states have passed laws limiting or protecting abortion rights since the U.S. Supreme Court overturned a nationwide right to the procedure in 2022. One of the latest is the Democratic-led state of Delaware. A law there will require the state employee health plan and Medicaid plans for lower-income residents to cover abortions with no deductible , copayments or other cost-sharing requirements. A new Minnesota law prohibits guns with “binary triggers” that allow for more rapid fire, causing a weapon to fire one round when the trigger is pulled and another when it is released. In Delaware, a law adds colleges and universities to a list of school zones where guns are prohibited, with exceptions for those working in their official capacity such as law officers and commissioned security guards. Kentucky is becoming the latest state to let people use marijuana for medical purposes . To apply for a state medical cannabis card, people must get written certification from a medical provider of a qualifying condition, such as cancer, multiple sclerosis, chronic pain, epilepsy, chronic nausea or post-traumatic stress disorder. Nearly four-fifths of U.S. states have now legalized medical marijuana. Minimum wage workers in more than 20 states are due to receive raises in January. The highest minimum wages will be in Washington, California and Connecticut, all of which will top $16 an hour after modest increases. The largest increases are scheduled in Delaware, where the minimum wage will rise by $1.75 to $15 an hour, and in Nebraska, where a ballot measure approved by voters in 2022 will add $1.50 to the current minimum of $12 an hour. Twenty other states still follow the federal minimum wage of $7.25 an hour. In Oregon, using drugs on public transit will be considered a misdemeanor crime of interfering with public transportation. While the measure worked its way through the legislature, multiple transportation officials said drug use on buses and trains, and at transit stops and stations, was making passengers and drivers feel less safe. In Missouri, law enforcement officers have spent the past 16 months issuing warnings to motorists that handheld cellphone use is illegal. Starting with the new year, penalties will kick in: a $150 fine for the first violation, progressing to $500 for third and subsequent offenses and up to 15 years imprisonment if a driver using a cellphone cause an injury or death. But police must notice a primary violation, such as speeding or weaving across lanes, to cite motorists for violating the cellphone law. Montana is the only state that hasn’t banned texting while driving , according to the National Conference of State Legislatures. Tenants in Arizona will no longer have to pay tax on their monthly rent , thanks to the repeal of a law that had allowed cities and towns to impose such taxes. While a victory for renters, the new law is a financial loss for governments. An analysis by Arizona’s nonpartisan Joint Legislative Budget Committee estimated that $230 million would be lost in municipal tax revenue during the first full fiscal year of implementation. Meanwhile Alabama will offer tax credits to businesses that help employees with child care costs. Kansas is eliminating its 2% sales tax on groceries. It also is cutting individual income taxes by dropping the top tax rate, increasing a credit for child care expenses and exempting all Social Security income from taxes, among other things. Taxpayers are expected to save about $320 million a year going forward. An Oklahoma law expands voting privileges to people who have been convicted of felonies but had their sentences discharged or commuted, including commutations for crimes that have been reclassified from felonies to misdemeanors. Former state Sen. George Young, an Oklahoma City Democrat, carried the bill in the Senate. “I think it’s very important that people who have gone through trials and tribulations in their life, that we have a system that brings them back and allows them to participate as contributing citizens,” Young said. Associated Press writers Trân Nguyễn in Sacramento, California; Kate Payne in Tallahassee, Florida; Jonathan Mattise in Nashville, Tennessee; Randall Chase in Dover, Delaware; Steve Karnowski in Minneapolis; Bruce Schreiner in Frankfort, Kentucky; Claire Rush in Portland, Oregon; Summer Ballentine in Jefferson City, Missouri; Gabriel Sandoval in Phoenix; Kim Chandler in Montgomery, Alabama; John Hanna in Topeka, Kansas; and Sean Murphy in Oklahoma City contributed.
EIM: Enjoying Tax-Free Income And Tender Offers
US stocks surge to records, shrugging off upheaval in South Korea, France
Fortive Corp. stock rises Wednesday, still underperforms market
Planetarium Labs Launches Immortal Rising 2 Path of Ascension Play 2 Airdrop Pre-Registration at YGG Play SummitNew 2025 laws hit hot topics from AI in movies to rapid-fire guns
CII seeks priority sector lending for new and emerging sectorsPresident Yoon's impeachment vote set for Saturday Published: 07 Dec. 2024, 07:00 LIM JEONG-WON [email protected] Protesters hold rallies calling for President Yoon Suk Yeol's impeachment in front of the National Assembly building in Yeouido, western Seoul, on Friday. [YONHAP] The impeachment vote against President Yoon Suk Yeol over the declaration of martial law this week will take place at the National Assembly on Saturday at 5 p.m., with Korea’s major political parties holding emergency meetings on Friday. Six opposition parties including the Democratic Party (DP) submitted to the parliament an impeachment bill against Yoon at 2:40 p.m. Wednesday. According to the National Assembly Act, impeachment bills must be voted on within 24 to 72 hours after the plenary session report. Assuming that lawmakers of all opposition parties attend the plenary session on Saturday and vote in favor of the motion, a total of 192 votes will be cast. Even if all of the opposition parties attend, they will still need to encourage eight members of the president's own party to cross party lines to receive the total 200 votes needed to impeach. Related Article After meeting with Yoon, PPP head Han still convinced president should be suspended NIS deputy director claims Yoon ordered 'arrests and cleanup' under martial law Head of President Yoon’s own party calls for ‘immediate suspension of duty’ 70% support Yoon's impeachment after martial law debacle: Survey Impeachment crisis looms as DP leads charge against Yoon People Power Party (PPP) leader Han Dong-hoon, having previously opposed the idea of impeaching Yoon, declared on Friday during the party’s emergency supreme council meeting that Yoon’s “immediate suspension from duty” is necessary to “protect the country and its people,” foreshadowing that a rift within the PPP could potentially form. Han stuck to this position even after a private meeting with Yoon Friday afternoon, saying he “had not heard any remarks to reverse a judgment of suspending Yoon from presidential duty.” “Although it would be hard to change the party's stance on Yoon's impeachment vote, my opinion is that Yoon should be suspended from duty,” Han reiterated after the meeting. Some opposition lawmakers have communicated with their PPP colleagues across the aisle and have gathered intel that the eight additional votes needed for impeachment could come, according to multiple reports. DP leader Lee Jae-myung said after his party’s emergency meeting on Friday that he had talked to Han about the impeachment bill earlier, saying that the two parties “need to communicate.” Rep. Chun Ha-ram, floor leader of the minor New Reform Party, said Friday that Rep. Lee Jun-seok had “individually confirmed” several PPP lawmakers’ intentions to support the impeachment the day before. PPP Rep. Ahn Cheol-soo posted on his social media that “the ruling and opposition parties must reach an agreement for orderly change and Yoon’s resignation.” Rep. Cho Kyoung-tae, also of the PPP, made the first definitive statement as a ruling party member to declare his support for the impeachment of Yoon on Friday. “It is a matter for politicians to decide whether to stand on the side of the people by suspending the president from his duties or to become an accomplice of the forces that declared martial law," Cho said. "I hope that all PPP members will become politicians who stand on the side of the people.” Nationwide, street protests demanding Yoon’s resignation have continued since Wednesday, while a joint prosecution-police-military probe into the circumstances of the martial law was announced on Friday. BY LIM JEONG-WON [ [email protected] ] var admarutag = admarutag || {} admarutag.cmd = admarutag.cmd || [] admarutag.cmd.push(function () { admarutag.pageview('3bf9fc17-6e70-4776-9d65-ca3bb0c17cb7'); });